Journal of Genetics

, Volume 97, Issue 5, pp 1097–1105 | Cite as

Molecular variation and population structure in endangered Limonium bicolor: genetic diversity of microsatellite markers and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis

  • Ge DingEmail author
  • Daizhen Zhang
  • Feng Xue
  • Jian Gao
  • Kai-Wun Yeh
Research Article


Knowledge and analysis of the genetic structure of an endangered species is important for its conservation and evolutionary process. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) were used in evaluation of the genetic diversity and population differentiation in Limonium bicolor (Plumbaginaceae), an endangered herb with high medicinal and horticulture value. A total of 117 alleles were detected with an average 5.85 alleles per locus using SSR and 222 bands from AFLP were amplified in six populations. It was found that L. bicolor was characterized by high levels of genetic polymorphism (100 and 83.78%), low levels of total genetic diversity (\(H_{\mathrm{t}}=\) 0.2824 and 0.2424), and moderate degrees of genetic differentiation among populations (\(\Phi _{\mathrm{ST}} =\) 0.284 and 0.251). Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that the main variation component existed within populations (71.56%; 74.93%) rather than among populations (28.44%; 25.07%). Four main clusters were displayed in the UPGMA using TFPGA, which was consistent with the result of principal coordinate analysis (PCA) using NTSYS. Mutations or infrequent gene flow among populations can increase the plant slowly, thus in situ conservation policies should be implemented first for effective and sustainable development. At the same time, ex situ measures, such as those individuals with rare alleles, to maintain the relationships between individuals and populations are also proposed.


genetic diversity simple sequence repeats amplified fragment length polymorphism plant conservation Limoniumbicolor 



This work was financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (no. BK20171276), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21606192), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2016M601795) and Natural science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province (no. 16KJB180029).


  1. Al-Qurainy F., Khan S., Nadeem M., Tarroum M. and Alaklabi A. 2013 Assessmentof phylogenetic relationship of rare plant species collected from Saudi Arabiausing internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Genet. Mol. Res. 12, 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker H. G. 1966 The evolution, functioning, and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 20, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai X. Y., Feng Z. Y., Hou B. W., Xing W. R. and Ding X. Y. 2012 Development of microsatellite markers for genetic diversity analysis of Dendrobium loddigesii Rolfe, an endangered orchid in China. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 43, 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai X. Y., Feng Z. Y., Zhang X. X., Xu W., Hou B. W. and Ding X. Y. 2011 Genetic diversity and population structure of an endangered Orchid (Dendrobium loddigesii Rolfe) from China revealed by SRAP markers. Sci. Hortic. 129, 877–881.Google Scholar
  5. Chen X. H., Guan J. J., Ding R., Zhang Q., Ling X. Z., Qu B. et al. 2013 Conservation genetics of the endangered terrestrial orchid Liparis japonica in Northeast China based on AFLP markers. Plant Syst. Evol. 299, 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding G., Zhang D. Z., Yu Y. Q., Zhao L. L. and Zhang B. B. 2013a Analysis of genetic variability and population structure of the endemic medicinal Limonium sinense using molecular markers. Gene 520, 189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding G., Zhang D. Z., Yu Y. Q., Zhao L. L. and Zhang B. B. 2013b Population genetic diversity and divergence of the halobiotic herb Limonium sinense estimated by AFLP and ISSR, and implications for conservation. Plant Syst. Evol. 299, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong B. H. 2005 Research on the conservation of Limonium sinense in the coast of Jiangsu. Chinese Wild Plant Res. 24, 28–30.Google Scholar
  9. Dulberger R. 1975 Intermorph structural differences between stigmatic papillae and pollen grains in relation to incompatibility in Plumbaginaceae. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B 188, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eduardo L. B., Joaa O. S. and George J. S. 2001 Self-incompatibility, inbreeding depression and crossing potential in five Brazilian Pleurothallis (Orchidaceae) Species. Ann. Bot. 88, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Excoffier L., Smouse P. E. and Quattro J. M. 1992 Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankham R., Bradshaw C. J. A and Brook B. W. 2014 Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol. Conserv. 170, 53–63.Google Scholar
  13. Ge S., Hong D. Y., Wang H. Q., Liu Z. Y. and Zhang C. M. 1998 Population genetic structure and conservation of an endangered conifer, Cathaya argyrophylla (Pinaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamrick J. L. and Godt M. J. W. 1996 Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Biol. Sci. 351, 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hou B. W., Tian M., Luo J., Yuan J., Xue Q. Y. and Ding X. Y. 2012 Genetic diversity assessment and ex situ conservation strategy of the endangered Dendrobium officinale (Orchidaceae) using new trinucleotide microsatellite markers. Plant Syst. Evol. 298, 1483–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiménez A., Weigelt B., Santos-Guerra A., Caujapé-Castells J., Fernández-Palacios J. M. and Conti E. 2017 Surviving in isolation: genetic variation, bottlenecks and reproductive strategies in the Canarian endemic Limonium macrophyllum (Plumbaginaceae). Genetica 145, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura M. and Crow J. F. 1964 The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49, 725–738.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lande R. 1988 Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241, 1455–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewontin R. C. 1972 The apportionment of human diversity. In Evolutionary biology (ed. T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht and W. C. Steere). Springer, Boston.Google Scholar
  20. Li H. L. 1978 Plumbaginaceae, flora of Taiwan, vol IV, pp. 90–93. Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, Taipei.Google Scholar
  21. Lopez L. and Barreiro R. 2013 Genetic guidelines for the conservation of the endangered polyploid Centaurea borjae (Asteraceae). J. Plant Res. 126, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDermott J. M. and McDonald B. A. 1993 Gene flow in plant pathosystems.  Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.  31, 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mengesha W. A., Demissew S., Fay M. F., Smith R. J., Nordal I. and Wilkin P. 2013 Genetic diversity and species delimitation in the cultivated and wild Guinea yams (Dioscorea spp.) from Southwest Ethiopia as determined by AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 60, 1365–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller M. P. 1997 Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA), Version 1.3: a windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, FlagstaffGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller M. P. 1998 AMOVA-PREP 1.01. A program for the preparation of AMOVA input files from dominant-marker raw data. Computer software distributed by author from
  26. Nei M. 1972 Genetic distances between populations. Am. Nat. 106, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nei M. 1973 Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3321–3323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nybom H. 2004 Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol. Ecol. 13, 1143–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nybom H. and Bartish I. V. 2000 Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palacios C. and González Candelas F. 1997 Analysis of population genetic structure and variability using RAPD markers in the endemic and endangered Limonium dufourii (Plumbaginaceae). Mol. Ecol. 6, 1107–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palacios C., Rossello J. A. and González-Candelas F. 2000 Study of the evolutionary relationships among Limonium Species (Plumbaginaceae) using nuclear and cytoplasmic molecular markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14, 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palacios C., Kresovich S. and González-Candelas F. 1999 A population genetic study of the endangered palnt species Limonium dufourii (Plumbaginaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Mol. Ecol. 8, 645–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palop-Esteban M., Segarra-Moragues J. G. and González-Candelas F. 2007 Historical and biological determinants of genetic diversity in the highly endemic triploid sea lavender Limonium dufourii (Plumbaginaceae). Mol. Ecol. 16, 3814–3827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palop-Esteban M., Segarra-Moragues J. G. and González-Candelas F. 2011 Polyploid origin, genetic diversity and population structure in the tetraploid sea lavender Limonium narbonense Miller (Plumbaginaceae) from eastern Spain. Genetica 139, 1309–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palop M., Palacios C. and Gonźalez-Candelas F. 2000 Development and across-species transferability of microsatellite markers in the genus Limonium (Plumbaginaceae). Conserv. Genet. 1, 177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qu R. Z., Hou L., Lü H. L. and Li H. Y. 2004 The gene flow of population genetic structure. Hereditas 26, 377–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Richards A. J. 1997 Plant breeding system. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rohlf F. J. 2002 NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.1., New York, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Sezai E., Ebru K., Emine O., Salih K., Yildiz D. and Ahmet E. 2011 Genetic characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes by AFLP markers. Biol. Res. 44, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sneath P. H. A. and Sokal R. R. 1973 Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: WH Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  41. Song Z. Q., Li X. F., Wang H. G. and Wang J. H. 2010 Genetic diversity and population structure of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge in China revealed by ISSR and SRAP. Genetica 138, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suárez-García C., Pérez de Paz J., Febles, R. and Caujapé-Castells J. 2009 Genetic diversity and floral dimorphism in Limonium dendroides (Plumbaginaceae), a woody Canarian species on the way of extinction. Plant Syst. Evol. 280, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tripathi N., Saini N., Nair P. and Tiwari S. 2012 Lack of genetic diversity of a critically endangered important medicinal plant Chlorophytum borivilianum in Central India revealed by AFLP markers. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 18, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vekemans X., Lefebvre C., Belalia L. and Meerts P. 1990 The evolution and breakdown of the heteromorphic incompatibility system of Armeria maritima revisited. Evol. Trends Pl. 4, 15–23.Google Scholar
  45. Villalba M. B. C. and Lumbreras E. L. 1993 Nuevas localidades de Limonium dufourii (Girard) O. Kuntze (Plumbaginaceae). Anales Del Jardín Botánico De Madrid 51, 154–155.Google Scholar
  46. Wang L., Liu Y., Hua L. Y. and Zhang L. L. 2010 Studies on the resources characteristic and chemical components for wild Limonium aureum (L.) Hill. Northern. Hortic. 11, 217–218.Google Scholar
  47. Wright S. 1951 The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugenetics 15, 323–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ye M. R., Hou B. W., Luo J., Yan W. J., Liu W. and Ding X. Y. 2015 Genetic diversity and conservation of the endangered herb Dendrobium moniliforme based on amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Sci. Hortic. 189, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yeh F. C. Yang R. C. and Boyle T. 1999 POPGENE ver. 1.32 Microsoft windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Quick user guide. Centre for International Forestry Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  50. Yu H. H., Yang Z. L., Sun B. and Liu R. N. 2011 Genetic diversity and relationship of endangered plant Magnolia officinalis (Magnoliaceae) assessed with ISSR polymorphisms. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 39, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhou X. Z., Li J. T. and Cui G. J. 1998 The bionomics of Limonium bicolor and its mass propagation. Hebei J. Forestry Orchard. Res. 13, 331–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ge Ding
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daizhen Zhang
    • 2
  • Feng Xue
    • 1
  • Jian Gao
    • 1
  • Kai-Wun Yeh
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringYancheng Institute of TechnologyYanchengPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental ProtectionYancheng Normal UniversityYanchengPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Institute of Plant BiologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations