The analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) aims at mapping and estimating the positions and effects of the genes that may affect the quantitative trait, and evaluating the relationship between the gene variation and the phenotype. In existing studies, most methods mainly focus on the association/linkage between multiple gene loci and one trait, in which some useful joint information of multiple traits may be ignored. In this paper, we proposed a method of simultaneously estimating all QTL parameters in the framework of multiple-trait multiple-interval mapping. Simulation results show that in accuracy aspect, the proposed method outperforms an existing method for mapping multiple traits. A real example is also provided to validate the performance of the new method.
EM algorithm estimation multiple-interval mapping recombination rate
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (A201207), the Science and Technology Innovation Team in Higher Education Institutions of Heilongjiang Province (no. 2014TD005), the Fundamental Research Funds on basic research project of Heilongjiang Provincial Colleges and Universities (no. 2016-KYYWF-0929), and the Innovation Project for University Students of Heilongjiang Province (no. 201610236006).
Calinski T., Kaczmarek Z. and Krajewski P. 2000 A multivariate approach to the problem of QTL localization. Heredity 84, 303–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Da Costa E Silva L., Wang S. C. and Zeng Z. B. 2012 Multiple trait multiple interval mapping of quantitative trait loci from inbred line crosses. BMC Genet. 13, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster A. P., Laird N. M. and Rubin D. B. 1977 Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 39, 1–38.Google Scholar
Evans D. M. 2002 The power of multivariate quantitative-trait loci linkage analysis is influenced by the correlation between variables. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 1599–1602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Korol A. B., Ronin Y. and Nevo E. 1998 Multi-interval mapping of correlated trait complexes. Heredity 80, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander E. S. and Botstein D. 1989 Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121, 185–199.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Liu J., Liu Y., Liu X. and Deng H. W. 2007 Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci for multiple complex traits with the use of variance components. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 304–320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Malosetti M., Ribaut J. M., Vargas M., Crossa J. and van Eeuwijk F. A. 2008 A multi-trait multi-environment QTL mixed model with an application to drought and nitrogen stress trials in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 161, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuschl C., Brockmann G. A. and Knott S. A. 2007 Multiple-trait QTL mapping for body and organ weights in a cross between NMRI8 and DBA/2 mice. Genet. Res. 89, 47–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Thomasen J. R., Guldbrandtsen B. and Sørensen P. 2008 Quantitative trait loci affecting calving traits in Danish Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 2098–2105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Tong L., Ma W., Liu H., Yuan C. and Zhou Y. 2015 Simultaneous estimation of QTL effects and positions when using genotype data with errors. J. Genet. 94, 27–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg H., Lyons M. A., Li R., Churchill G. A., Carey M. C. and Paigen B. 2003 FXR and ABCG5/ABCG8 as determinants of cholesterol gallstone formation from quantitative trait locus mapping in mice. Gastroenterology 125, 868–881.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar