Role of PEG 2000 in the surface modification and physicochemical characteristics of pyrazinamide loaded nanostructured lipid carriers

  • Gourab Karmakar
  • Prasant Nahak
  • Pritam Guha
  • Biplab Roy
  • Ranendu Kumar Nath
  • Amiya Kumar Panda
Regular Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine, tristearin and oleic acid were employed in preparing nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC). Surface modified NLCs (\(\hbox {NLC}_\mathrm{PEG})\) were formulated by adding polyethylene glycol 2000 (PEG 2000) in the dispersion medium along with Tween 60. Hot homogenization followed by ultrasonication technique was used as the preparative procedure. 0.01% (w/v, g/mL) PEG 2000 was found to be the saturation limit for the studied formulations. Pyrazinamide (PYZ) was incorporated in NLC; the base and drug-loaded formulations were characterized by combined dynamic light scattering (DLS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). \(\hbox {NLC}_\mathrm{PEG}\) was more stable than the conventional NLC formulations. Added PEG 2000 provided extra steric stability to \(\hbox {NLC}_\mathrm{PEG}\) systems by introducing an additional layer over their surface. The presence of the additional layer of PEG 2000 also offered a preventative barrier towards the expulsion of surface accumulated PYZ. Considerable improvement in entrapment efficiency (EE%), drug loading (DL%) and desirable sustained release profile could be achieved in NLC.

Graphical Abstract

Nanostructure lipid carrier (NLC) formulations were modified with PEG 2000. Pyrazinamide (PYZ) was incorporated into the NLC. Stability, entrapment efficiency and drug loading of the \(\hbox {NLC}_\mathrm{PEG}\) formulations were better than NLC. Sustained release of incorporated PYZ was recorded for \(\hbox {NLC}_\mathrm{PEG}\).

Keywords

NLC \(\hbox {NLC}_\mathrm{PEG}\) PEG 2000 pyrazinamide Tween 60 surface modification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors sincerely acknowledge Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi for the financial support as research grant (SR/S1/PC-32/2011) for this work.

Supplementary material

12039_2018_1448_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (513 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 512 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Müller R H 2007 Lipid nanoparticles: recent advances Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Müller R H, Radtke M and Wissing S A 2002 Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54 S131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Müller R H, Radtke M and Wissing S A 2002 Nanostructured lipid matrices for improved microencapsulation of drugs Int. J. Pharm. 242 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Müller R H, Rűhl D and Runge S A 1996 Biodegradation of solid lipid nanoparticles as a function of lipase incubation time Int. J. Pharm. 144 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ranpise N S, Korabu S S and Ghodake V N 2014 Second generation lipid nanoparticles (NLC) as an oral drug carrier for delivery of lercanidipine hydrochloride Colloid Surface B 116 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karmakar G, Nahak P, Guha P, Roy B, Chettri P, Sapkota M, Koirala S, Misono T, Torigoe K, Ghosh S and Panda A K 2016 Effects of Fatty Acids on the Interfacial and Solution Behavior of Mixed Lipidic Aggregates Called Solid Lipid Nanoparticles J. Oleo. Sci. 65 419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nahak P, Karmakar G, Chettri P, Roy B, Guha P, Besra S E, Soren A, Bykov A G, Akentiev A V, Noskov B A and Panda A K 2016 Influence of Lipid Core Material on Physicochemical Characteristics of an Ursolic Acid-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carrier: An Attempt To Enhance Anticancer Activity Langmuir 32 9816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nahak P, Karmakar G, Roy B, Guha P, Sapkota M, Koirala S, Chang C-H and Panda A K 2015 Physicochemical studies on local anaesthetic loaded second generation nanolipid carriers RSC Adv. 5 26061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sapkota M, Karmakar G, Nahak P, Guha P, Roy B, Koirala S, Chettri P, Das K, Misono T, Torigoe K and Panda A K 2015 Effect of polymer charge on the formation and stability of anti-inflammatory drug loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: physicochemical approach RSC Adv. 5 65697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li W, Das S, Ng K-y and Heng P W S 2011 Formulation, Biological and Pharmacokinetic Studies of Sucrose Ester-Stabilized Nanosuspensions of Oleanolic Acid Pharm. Res. 28 2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah R M, Malherbe F, Eldridge D, Palombo E A and Harding I H 2014 Physicochemical characterization of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) prepared by a novel microemulsion technique J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 428 286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tamjidi F, Shahedi M, Varshosaz J and Nasirpour A 2013 Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC): A potential delivery system for bioactive food molecules Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 19 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yadav N, Khatak S and Singh Sara U V 2013 Solid lipid nanoparticles: a review Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 5 8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Man D K W, Casettari L, Cespi M, Bonacucina G, Palmieri G F, Sze S C W Leung G P H, Lam J K W and Kwok P C L 2015 Oleanolic Acid Loaded PEGylated PLA and PLGA Nanoparticles with Enhanced Cytotoxic Activity against Cancer Cells Mol. Pharm. 12 2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang S, Gao D, Zhao T, Zhou J and Zhao X 2013 An evaluation of the anti-tumor efficac of oleanolic acid-loaded PEGylated liposomes Nanotechnology 24 1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Medina-O’Donnell M, Rivas F, Reyes-Zurita F J, Martinez A, Martin-Fonseca S, Garcia-Granados A, Ferrer-Martín R M, Lupianez J A and Parra A 2016 Semi-synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of PEGylated pentacyclic triterpenes Eur. J. Med. Chem. 118 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Das S and Chaudhury A 2011 Recent Advances in Lipid Nanoparticle Formulations with Solid Matrix for Oral Drug Delivery AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 12 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mukherjee S, Ray S and Thakur R S 2009 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: A Modern Formulation Approach in Drug Delivery System Ind. J. Pharm. Sci. 71 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pandey R and Khuller G K 2005 Solid lipid particle-based inhalable sustained drug delivery system against experimental tuberculosis Tuberculosis 85 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pandey R, Sharma S and Khuller G K 2005 Oral solid lipid nanoparticle-based antitubercular chemotherapy Tuberculosis 85 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wong H, Li Y, Bendayan R, Rauth M and Wu X 2007 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Anti-tumor Drug Delivery (Hoboken: Taylor and Francis)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muhlen A Z, Muhlen E Z, Niehus H and Mehnert W 1996 Atomic Force Microscopy Studies of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Pharm. Res. 13 1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shahgaldian P, Quattrocchi L, Gualbert J R M, Coleman A W and Goreloff P 2003 AFM imaging of calixarene based solid lipid nanoparticles in gel matrices Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 55 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Larsson K 1997 Cubosomes and hexosomes for drug delivery Proc. Int. Symp. Controlled Release Bioact. Mater. 24 198Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spicer P 2005 Cubosome processing industrial nanoparticle technology development Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 83 1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spicer P T 2003 Cubosome formation via dilution: Kinetic effects and consumer product implications ACS Symp. Ser. 861 346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spicer P T 2005 Progress in liquid crystalline dispersions: cubosomes Curr. Opin. Colloid In. 10274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dash S, Murthy P N, Nath L and Chowdhury P 2010 Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems Acta Pol. Pharm. 67 217Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, Zou A, Li W, Yao C and Xie S 2010 DDSolver: an add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles AAPS J. 12263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gourab Karmakar
    • 1
  • Prasant Nahak
    • 1
  • Pritam Guha
    • 1
  • Biplab Roy
    • 1
  • Ranendu Kumar Nath
    • 2
  • Amiya Kumar Panda
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of North BengalDarjeelingIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryTripura UniversitySuryamaninagarIndia
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry and Chemical TechnologyVidyasagar UniversityMidnaporeIndia

Personalised recommendations