Abstract
The epigenetic memory is an essential aspect of multicellular organisms to maintain several cell types and their gene expression pattern. This complex process uses a number of protein factors and specific DNA elements within the developmental cues to achieve this. The protein factors involved in the process are the Polycomb group (PcG) members, and, accordingly, the DNA sequences that interact with these proteins are called Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). Since the PcG proteins are highly conserved among higher eukaryotes, including insects, and function at thousands of sites in the genomes, it is expected that PREs may also be present across the genome. However, the studies on PREs in insect species, other than Drosophila, is currently lacking. We took a bioinformatics approach to develop an inclusive PRE prediction tool, ‘PRE Mapper’, to address this need. By applying this tool on the Drosophila melanogaster genome, we predicted >20,000 PREs. When compared with the available PRE prediction methods, this tool shows far better performance by correctly identifying the in vivo binding sites of PcG proteins, identified by genome-scale ChIP experiments. Further analysis of the predicted PREs shows their cohabitation with chromatin domain boundary elements at several places in the Drosophila genome, possibly defining a composite epigenetic module. We analysed 10 insect genomes in this context and find several conserved features in PREs across the insect species with some variations in their occurrence frequency. These analyses leading to the identification of PRE in insect genomes contribute to our understanding of epigenetic mechanisms in these organisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barges S, Mihaly J, Galloni M, Hagstrom K, Muller M, Shanower G, Schedl P, Gyurkovics H and Karch F 2000 The Fab-8 boundary defines the distal limit of the bithorax complex iab-7 domain and insulates iab-7 from initiation elements and a pre in the adjacent iab-8 domain. Development 127 779–790
Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert D, Cuff J, Fry B, Meissner A, Wernig M, Plath K, Jaenisch R, Wagschal A, Feil R, Schreiber SL and Lander ES 2006 A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125 315–326
Blastyak A, Mishra RK, Karch F and Gyurkovics H 2006 Efficient and specific targeting of polycomb group proteins requires cooperative interaction between grainyhead and pleiohomeotic. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 1434–1444
Brown JL, Fritsch C, Mueller J and Kassis JA 2003 The Drosophila pho-like gene encodes a YY1-related DNA binding protein that is redundant with pleiohomeotic in homeotic gene silencing. Development 130 285–294
Brown JL, Grau DJ, DeVido SK and Kassis JA 2005 An Sp1/Klf binding site is important for the activity of a polycomb group response element from the Drosophila engrailed gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 5181–5189
Brown JL, Mucci D, Whiteley M, Dirksen ML and Kassis JA 1998 The Drosophila polycomb group gene pleiohomeotic encodes a DNA binding protein with homology to the transcription factor YY1. Mol. Cell. 1 1057–1064
Brown JP, Singh PB and Cowell IG 2003 Composite cis-acting epigenetic switches in eukaryotes: Lessons from Drosophila Fab-7 for the Igf2-H19 imprinted domain. Genetica 117 199–207
Chan CS, Rastelli L and Pirrotta V 1994 A polycomb response element in the ubx gene that determines an epigenetically inherited state of repression. EMBO J. 13 2553–2564
Chintapalli VR, Wang J and Dow JA 2007 Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat. Genet. 39 715–720
Cunningham MD, Brown JL and Kassis JA 2010 Characterization of the polycomb group response elements of the Drosophila melanogaster invected locus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30 820–828
Cuvier O, Hart CM, Kas E and Laemmli UK 2002 Identification of a multicopy chromatin boundary element at the borders of silenced chromosomal domains. Chromosoma 110 519–531
Dejardin J, Rappailles A, Cuvier O, Grimaud C, Decoville M, Locker D and Cavalli G 2005 Recruitment of Drosophila polycomb group proteins to chromatin by DSP1. Nature 434 533–538
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium 2007 Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 450 203–218
Duan J, Li R, Cheng D, Fan W, Zha X, Cheng T, Wu Y, Wang J, Mita K, Xiang Z and Xia Q 2010 Silkdb v2.0: A platform for silkworm (Bombyx mori) genome biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 38 D453–456
Eagen KP, Aiden EL and Kornberg RD 2017 Polycomb-mediated chromatin loops revealed by a subkilobase-resolution chromatin interaction map. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 8764–8769
Elsik CG, Tayal A, Unni DR, Burns GW and Hagen DE 2018 Hymenoptera genome database: Using hymenopteramine to enhance genomic studies of hymenopteran insects. Methods Mol. Biol. 1757 513–556
Erceg J, Pakozdi T, Marco-Ferreres R, Ghavi-Helm Y, Girardot C, Bracken AP and Furlong EE 2017 Dual functionality of cis-regulatory elements as developmental enhancers and polycomb response elements. Genes Dev. 31 590–602
Farkas G and Udvardy A 1992 Sequence of scs and scs’ Drosophila DNA fragments with boundary function in the control of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 20 2604
Fiedler T and Rehmsmeier M 2006 Jpredictor: A versatile tool for the prediction of cis-regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 W546–W550
Francis NJ and Kingston RE 2001 Mechanisms of transcriptional memory. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2 409–421
Fujioka M, Yusibova GL, Zhou J and Jaynes JB 2008 The DNA-binding polycomb-group protein pleiohomeotic maintains both active and repressed transcriptional states through a single site. Development 135 4131–4139
Giraldo-Calderón GI, Emrich SJ, MacCallum RM, Maslen G, Dialynas E, Topalis P, Ho N, Gesing S, VectorBase Consortium, Madey G, Collins FH and Lawson D 2015 Vectorbase: An updated bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vectors and other organisms related with human diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 D707–713
Glastad KM, Hunt BG and Goodisman MAD 2019 Epigenetics in insects: Genome regulation and the generation of phenotypic diversity. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 64 185–203
Hauenschild A, Ringrose L, Altmutter C, Paro R and Rehmsmeier M 2008 Evolutionary plasticity of polycomb/trithorax response elements in Drosophila species. PLoS Biol. 6 e261
i5K Consortium 2013 The i5k initiative: Advancing arthropod genomics for knowledge human health agriculture and the environment. J. Hered. 104 595–600
International Aphid Genomics Consortium 2010 Genome sequence of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. PLoS Biol. 8 e1000313
Jjingo D, Wang J, Conley AB, Lunyak VV and Jordan IK 2013 Compound cis-regulatory elements with both boundary and enhancer sequences in the human genome. Bioinformatics 29 3109–3112
Kar G, Kim JK, Kolodziejczyk AA, Natarajan KN, Triglia ET, Mifsud B, Elderkin S, Marioni JC, Pombo A and Teichmann SA 2017 Flipping between polycomb repressed and active transcriptional states introduces noise in gene expression. Nat. Commun. 8 36
Karch F, Galloni M, Sipos L, Gausz J, Gyurkovics H and Sched P 1994 Mcp and Fab-7: Molecular analysis of putative boundaries of cis-regulatory domains in the bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 3138–3146
Kassis JA 2002 Pairing-sensitive silencing polycomb group response elements and transposon homing in Drosophila. Adv. Genet. 46 421–438
Kassis JA and Brown JL 2013 Polycomb group response elements in Drosophila and vertebrates. Adv. Genet. 81 83–118
Kohler C and Villar CB 2008 Programming of gene expression by polycomb group proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 18 236–243
Kuhn EJ, Viering MM, Rhodes KM and Geyer PK 2003 A test of insulator interactions in Drosophila. EMBO J 22 2463–2471
Li B, Carey M and Workman JL 2007 The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128 707–719
Mihaly J, Mishra RK and Karch F 1998 A conserved sequence motif in polycomb-response elements. Mol. Cell 1 1065–1066
Mishra RK, Mihaly J, Barges S, Spierer A, Karch F, Hagstrom K, Schweinsberg SE and Schedl P 2001 The iab-7 polycomb response element maps to a nucleosome-free region of chromatin and requires both GAGA and pleiohomeotic for silencing activity. Mol. Cell Biol. 21 1311–1318
Muller M, Hagstrom K, Gyurkovics H, Pirrotta V and Schedl P 1999 The Mcp element from the Drosophila melanogaster bithorax complex mediates long-distance regulatory interactions. Genetics 153 1333–1356
Negre N, Hennetin J, Sun LV, Lavrov S, Bellis M, White KP and Cavalli G 2006 Chromosomal distribution of PcG proteins during Drosophila development. PLoS Biol. 4 e170
Oktaba K, Gutierrez L, Gagneur J, Girardot C, Sengupta AK, Furlong EE and Muller J 2008 Dynamic regulation by polycomb group protein complexes controls pattern formation and the cell cycle in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 15 877–889
Okulski H, Druck B, Bhalerao S and Ringrose L 2011 Quantitative analysis of polycomb response elements (pres) at identical genomic locations distinguishes contributions of pre sequence and genomic environment. Epigenetics Chromatin 4 4
Orsi GA, Kasinathan S, Hughes KT, Saminadin-Peter S, Henikoff S and Ahmad K 2014 High-resolution mapping defines the cooperative architecture of polycomb response elements. Genome Res. 24 809–820
Papanicolaou A, Schetelig MF, Arensburger P, Atkinson PW, Benoit JB, Bourtzis K, Castanera P, Cavanaugh JP, et al. 2016 The whole genome sequence of the mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (wiedemann), reveals insights into the biology and adaptive evolution of a highly invasive pest species. Genome Biol. 17 192
Papp B and Muller J 2006 Histone trimethylation and the maintenance of transcriptional on and off states by trxG and PcG proteins. Genes Dev. 20 2041–2054
Prezioso C and Orlando V 2008 Polycomb proteins in mammalian cell differentiation and plasticity. FEBS Lett. 585 2067–2077
Ramírez F, Bhardwaj V, Arrigoni L, Lam KC, Grüning BA, Villaveces J, Habermann B, Akhtar A and Manke T 2018 High-resolution tads reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies. Nat. Commun. 9 189
Ramos E, Ghosh D, Baxter E and Corces VG 2006 Genomic organization of gypsy chromatin insulators in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172 2337–2349
Ray P, De S, Mitra A, Bezstarosti K, Demmers JA, Pfeifer K and Kassis JA 2016 Combgap contributes to recruitment of polycomb group proteins in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 3826–3831
Ringrose L and Paro R 2004 Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the polycomb and trithorax group proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38 413–443
Ringrose L and Paro R 2007 Polycomb/trithorax response elements and epigenetic memory of cell identity. Development 134 223–232
Ringrose L, Rehmsmeier M, Dura JM and Paro R 2003 Genome-wide prediction of polycomb/trithorax response elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Cell 5 759–771
Rivera J, Keranen SVE, Gallo SM and Halfon MS 2019 Redfly: The transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 D828–D834
Schuettengruber B and Cavalli G 2009 Recruitment of polycomb group complexes and their role in the dynamic regulation of cell fate choice. Development 136 3531–3542
Schuettengruber B, Chourrout D, Vervoort M, Leblanc B and Cavalli G 2007 Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins. Cell 128 735–745
Schuettengruber B, Ganapathi M, Leblanc B, Portoso M, Jaschek R, Tolhuis B, van Lohuizen M, Tanay A and Cavalli G 2009 Functional anatomy of polycomb and trithorax chromatin landscapes in Drosophila embryos. PLoS Biol. 7 e13.
Schuettengruber B, Elkayam NO, Sexton T, Entrevan M, Stern S, Thomas A, Yaffe E, Parrinello H, Tanay A and Cavalli G 2014 Cooperativity specificity and evolutionary stability of polycomb targeting in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 9 219–233
Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Nix DA, Li XY, Bourgon R, Biggin M and Pirrotta V 2006 Genome-wide analysis of polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 38 700–705
Singh NP and Mishra RK 2015 Specific combinations of boundary element and polycomb response element are required for the regulation of the Hox genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech. Dev. 138 141–150
Speir ML, Zweig AS, Rosenbloom KR, Raney BJ, Paten B, Nejad P, Lee BT, Learned K, Karolchik D, Hinrichs AS and Heitner S 2016 The UCSC genome browser database: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 D717–725
Srinivasan A and Mishra RK 2012 Chromatin domain boundary element search tool for Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 40 4385–4395
Strutt H, Cavalli G and Paro R 1997 Co-localization of polycomb protein and gaga factor on regulatory elements responsible for the maintenance of homeotic gene expression. EMBO J. 16 3621–3632
Tolhuis B, Muijrers I, de Wit E, Teunissen H, Talhout W, van Steensel B, van Lohuizen M 2006 Genome-wide profiling of PRC1 and PRC2 polycomb chromatin binding in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 38 694–699
Vazquez J, Muller M, Pirrotta V and Sedat JW 2006 The Mcp element mediates stable long-range chromosome-chromosome interactions in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Cell 17 2158–2165
Werren JH, Richards S, Desjardins CA, Niehuis O, Gadau J, Colbourne JK and Nasonia Genome Working Group 2010 Functional and evolutionary insights from the genomes of three parasitoid Nasonia species. Science 327 343–348
Zeng J, Kirk BD, Gou Y, Wang Q and Ma J 2012 Genome-wide polycomb target gene prediction in Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 40 5848–5863
Zhao C, Escalante LN, Chen H, Benatti TR, Qu J, Chellapilla S, Waterhouse RM, Wheeler D, Andersson MN, Bao R and Batterton M 2015 A massive expansion of effector genes underlies gall-formation in the wheat pest Mayetiola destructor. Curr. Biol. 25 613–620
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support of Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and the bioinformatics facility of CSIR-CCMB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection: Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srinivasan, A., Mishra, R.K. Genomic organization of Polycomb Response Elements and its functional implication in Drosophila and other insects. J Biosci 45, 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-019-9975-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-019-9975-2