Searching for dual active galactic nuclei
- 7 Downloads
Binary or dual active galactic nuclei (DAGN) are expected from galaxy formation theories. However, confirmed DAGN are rare and finding these systems has proved to be challenging. Recent systematic searches for DAGN using double-peaked emission lines have yielded several new detections, as have the studies of samples of merging galaxies. In this paper, we present an updated list of DAGN compiled from published data. We also present preliminary results from our ongoing Expanded Very Large Array (EVLA) radio study of eight double-peaked emission-line AGN (DPAGN). One of the sample galaxy shows an S-shaped radio jet. Using new and archival data, we have successfully fitted a precessing jet model to this radio source. We find that the jet precession could be due to a binary AGN with a super-massive black-hole (SMBH) separation of \(\sim \) 0.02 pc or a single AGN with a tilted accretion disk. We have found that another sample galaxy, which is undergoing a merger, has two radio cores with a projected separation of 5.6 kpc. We discuss the preliminary results from our radio study.
KeywordsGalaxy merger dual AGN radio observations
The authors would like to thank the referee for insightful comments that improved the paper considerably. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under co-operative agreement by Associated Universities Inc. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, and the participating institutions. SDSS-IV acknowledges support and resources from the Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah. The SDSS website is www.sdss.org. The authors would like to thank the organizers of the RETCO-2017 meeting.
- Albareti F. D., Allende Prieto C. et al. 2016, SDSS Collaboration, arXiv:1608.02013
- Burke-Spolaor S., Brazier A., Chatterjee S., Comerford J., Cordes J., Lazio T. J. W., Liu X., Shen Y. 2014, preprint arXiv:1402.0548
- Das M., Rubinur K., Kharb P., Varghese A., Navyasree K., James A. 2017, ArXiv e-prints: arXiv:1708.01185
- Davis M., Gerke B. F., Newman J. A. 2004, arXiv:astro-ph/0408344
- Hovatta T., Aller M. F., Aller H. D. et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 143Google Scholar
- McGurk R. C., Max C. E., Rosario D. J., Shields G. A., Smith K. L., Wright S. A. 2011, ApJ, 738L, 2Google Scholar
- McMullin J. P., Waters B., Schiebel D., Young W., Golap K. 2007, in Shaw R. A., Hill F., Bell D. J., eds, ASP Conference Series, Volume 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI. Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, p. 127Google Scholar
- Satyapal S., Secrest N. J., Ricci C., Ellison S. L., Rothberg B., Blecha L., Constantin A., Gliozzi M., McNulty P., Ferguson J. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1707.03921