Advertisement

Suzaku observation of the eclipsing high mass X-ray binary pulsar XTE J1855-026

  • Jincy Devasia
  • Biswajit Paul
Article

Abstract

We report results from analysis performed on an eclipsing supergiant high mass X-ray binary pulsar XTE J1855-026 observed with the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) on-board Suzaku Observatory in April 2015. Suzaku observed this source for a total effective exposure of \(\sim \)87 ks just before an eclipse. Pulsations are clearly observed and the pulse profiles of XTE J1855-026 did not show significant energy dependence during this observation consistent with previous reports. The time averaged energy spectrum of XTE J1855-026 in the 1.0–10.5 keV energy range can be well fitted with a partial covering power law model modified with interstellar absorption along with a black-body component for soft excess and a gaussian for iron fluorescence line emision. The hardness ratio evolution during this observation indicated significant absorption of soft X-rays in some segments of the observation. For better understanding of the reason behind this, we performed time-resolved spectroscopy in the 2.5–10.5 keV energy band which revealed significant variations in the spectral parameters, especially the hydrogen column density and iron line equivalent width with flux. The correlated variations in the spectral parameters indicate towards the presence of clumps in the stellar wind of the companion star accounting for the absorption of low energy X-rays in some time segments.

Keywords

X-ray: neutron stars X-ray binaries: individual (XTE J1855-026) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has made use of data obtained from the Suzaku satellite, a collaborative mission between the space agencies of Japan (JAXA) and the USA (NASA).

References

  1. Corbet R. H. D., Mukai K. 2002, ApJ, 577, 923ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corbet R. H. D., Marshall F. E., Peele A. G., Takeshima T. 1999, ApJ, 517, 956ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Falanga M., Bozzo E., Lutornor A., Bonnet-Bidaud J. M., Fetisora Y., Puli J. 2015, A&A, 577, 130Google Scholar
  4. Fürst F., Kreykenbohm I., Pottschmidt K., Wilms J., et al. 2010., A&A, 519, A37ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gonazalez-Galan A. 2015, arXiv:1503.1087
  6. Islam N., Paul B. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2539ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koyama K. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krimm H. A. et al. 2012, ATel, 3964, 1ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitsuda K. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Naik S., Paul B., Ali Z. 2011, ApJ, 737, 79ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Negueruela I., Casares J., Verrecchia F., Blay P., Israel G. L., Covino S. 2008, ATel, 1876, 1ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Paul B., Nagase F., Endo T., Dotani T., Yokogawa J., Nishiuchi M. 2002, ApJ, 579, 411ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pradhan P., Maitra C., Paul B., Islam N., Paul B. C. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2691ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pradhan P., Paul B., Paul B. C., Bozzo E., Belloni T. M. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4467ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Takahashi T. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 35ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Watanabe K., Bozzo E., Mereghetti S., Gotz C. B. D. 2010, ATel, 2482, 1ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Raman Research InstituteBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Henry Baker CollegeMelukavu, KottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations