Skip to main content
Log in

Easy In Vitro Synthesis of Optimised Functioning Reporter mRNA from Common eGFP Plasmid

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Molecular Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extensive growth in number and importance of experiments and clinical-aimed techniques based solely or majorly on the activity of RNA strands, e.g. CRSPR/Cas9 and siRNA, has put emphasis on the necessity of standardisation of experiments with RNA. Considering RNA degradation during its handling seems to be a major hindrance in all RNA-based tools, the assessment of its integrity is of utmost importance. Furthermore, evaluating whether the RNA to be transfected is intact requires time-consuming electrophoresis protocol. In view of the RNA lability and the necessity for controlling experiments performed with this molecule, the transfection of a reporter mRNA may be of aid in optimising experiments. Nevertheless, commercial reporter mRNAs are far less available than plasmids for such purpose. Thus, in this work, we aimed at the optimisation of an easily performed protocol to produce a suitable eGFP mRNA. By utilising molecular biology kits customarily employed in molecular biology laboratories working with RNA-based techniques and starting from any eGFP coding vector, we produced four mRNA molecules: (1) eGFP mRNA (non-polyadenylated); (2) Kozak-eGFP mRNA (non-polyadenylated, produced from the Kozak-containing amplicon); (3) eGFP-PolyA mRNA (polyadenylated); (4) Kozak-eGFP-PolyA mRNA (containing both signals, Kozak sequence and poly(A) tail). These mRNA molecules were transfected into HEK 293 FT cells, readily transfectable, and into the MDBK bovine lineage, which has been observed as difficult-to-transfect DNA constructs. eGFP expression could be detected both by flow cytometry and by fluorescence microscopy after transfection with the polyadenylated mRNAs. Upon cytometric analysis, we noted a marked difference among the mRNA groups (p < 0.01), both in fluorescent population percentage and in florescence intensity. We showed here the necessity of the polyadenylation step in order to achieve cell expression of the eGFP observable under fluorescence microscopy. The presence of the Kozak sequence, as a 5′ element, seems to augment significantly the level of protein produced upon mRNA transfection. We presented here an easy protocol to allow production of functioning mRNAs from any DNA construct. The molecules produced may aid in the standardisation and controlling most of the RNA-related experiments as well as it gives proper guidance for researchers performing expression of other proteins through mRNA transfection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thermo. Technical Bulletin #159: Working with RNA. Retrieved Jan 1, 2017, from http://www.thermofisher.com/br/en/home/references/ambion-tech-support/nuclease-enzymes/general-articles/working-with-rna.html.

  2. Nielsen, H. (2011). Working with RNA (pp. 15–28). New York: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-248-9_2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Tripathy, D. R., Dinda, A. K., & Dasgupta, S. (2013). A simple assay for the ribonuclease activity of ribonucleases in the presence of ethidium bromide. Analytical Biochemistry, 437(2), 126–129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Probst, J., Brechtel, S., Scheel, B., Hoerr, I., Jung, G., Rammensee, H.-G., et al. (2006). Characterization of the ribonuclease activity on the skin surface. Genetic Vaccines and Therapy, 4(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-4-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang, X., Potter, J., Kumar, S., Zou, Y., Quintanilla, R., Sridharan, M., et al. (2015). Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. Journal of Biotechnology, 208, 44–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boettcher, M., & McManus, M. T. (2015). Choosing the right tool for the job: RNAi, TALEN, or CRISPR. Molecular Cell, 58(4), 575–585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrov, A., Tsa, A., & Puglisi, J. D. (2013). Analysis of RNA by analytical polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Methods in Enzymology, 530, 301–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murugaiah, V., Zedalis, W., Lavine, G., Charisse, K., & Manoharan, M. (2010). Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous analysis of two liposome-formulated short interfering RNA duplexes. Analytical Biochemistry, 401(1), 61–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, X., Kriz, A. J., & Sharp, P. A. (2014). Target specificity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Quantitative Biology, 2(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-014-0030-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Tendeloo, V. F., Ponsaerts, P., Lardon, F., Nijs, G., Lenjou, M., Van Broeckhoven, C., et al. (2001) Highly efficient gene delivery by mRNA electroporation in human hematopoietic cells: superiority to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells. Blood, 98(1), 49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nii, T., Kohara, H., Marumoto, T., Sakuma, T., Yamamoto, T., & Tani, K. (2016). Single-cell-state culture of human pluripotent stem cells increases transfection efficiency. BioResearch Open Access, 5(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2016.0009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kouranova, E., Forbes, K., Zhao, G., Warren, J., Bartels, A., Wu, Y., et al. CRISPRs for optimal targeting: Delivery of CRISPR components as DNA, RNA, and protein into cultured cells and single-cell embryos. Human Gene Therapy, 27(6), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2016.009.

  13. Zou, S., Scarfo, K., Nantz, M. H., & Hecker, J. G. (2010). Lipid-mediated delivery of RNA is more efficient than delivery of DNA in non-dividing cells. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 389(1–2), 232–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Dorkin, J. R., Zhu, L. J., Li, Y., Wu, Q., et al. (2016). Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo. Nature Biotechnology, 34(3), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hashimoto, M., & Takemoto, T. (2015). Electroporation enables the efficient mRNA delivery into the mouse zygotes and facilitates CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 11315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuo, E., Cai, Y.-J., Li, K., Wei, Y., Wang, B.-A., Sun, Y., et al. (2017) One-step generation of complete gene knockout mice and monkeys by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing with multiple sgRNAs. Cell Research, 27(7), 933–945. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2017.81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelley, M. L., Strezoska, Ž, He, K., Vermeulen, A., & van Smith, A. B. (2016). Versatility of chemically synthesized guide RNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Journal of Biotechnology. 233, 74–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soboleski, M. R. (2004). Green fluorescent protein is a quantitative reporter of gene expression in individual eukaryotic cells. The FASEB Journal, 19, 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-3180fje.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Utratna, M., & O’Byrne, C. P. (2014). Using enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) promoter fusions to study gene regulation at single cell and population levels (pp. 233–247). New York: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0703-8_20.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kung, S. H., Wang, Y. C., Lin, C. H., Kuo, R. L., & Liu, W. T. (2000). Rapid diagnosis and quantification of herpes simplex virus with a green fluorescent protein reporter system. Journal of Virological Methods, 90(2):205–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie, Z., Shao, S., Lv, J., Wang, C., Yuan, C., Zhang, W., et al. (2011). Co-transfection and tandem transfection of HEK293A cells for overexpression and RNAi experiments. Cell Biology International, 35(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1042/CBI20100470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ducrest, A.-L. (2002). Detection of promoter activity by flow cytometric analysis of GFP reporter expression. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(14), e65–e65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Merten, O.-W., Hebben, M., & Bovolenta, C. (2016). Production of lentiviral vectors. Molecular Therapy: Methods & Clinical Development, 3, 16017.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, T. K., & Eberwine, J. H. (2010). Mammalian cell transfection: The present and the future. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 397(8), 3173–3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3821-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge FAPEMIG (Research Support Foundation of Minas Gerais) and CNPq (National Council for Research and Development) for furthering our research. We would also like to express our gratitude towards EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation) and towards Carolina Capobiango for such great aid in the laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Torres de Souza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Souza, G.T., Hell, R.C.R., da Silva Souza, J.F. et al. Easy In Vitro Synthesis of Optimised Functioning Reporter mRNA from Common eGFP Plasmid. Mol Biotechnol 60, 762–771 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-018-0112-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-018-0112-5

Keywords

Navigation