Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spreading Diffusion-Restriction Events in the Gyrencephalic Brain After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Revealed by Continuous Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Spreading cortical depolarization
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

How widely spreading depolarizations (SDs) propagate through the gyrencephalic brain, including sulci and deeper cortical areas, remains an important clinical question. Here, we investigated SDs that occur spontaneously after subarachnoid placement of autologous blood clots in sulci of the juvenile swine brain.

Methods

To investigate the three-dimensional spread of waves, animals underwent continuous diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for up to 6 h following clot placement. SD is the mechanism of the cytotoxic edema of developing infarction that is diagnosed by DW-MRI, and DW-MRI also captures transient diffusion restriction caused by SD in less injured or healthy brains. Here, images (b = 0, 375, and 750) were acquired across five coronal slices with 1.25 × 1.25-mm in-plane resolution and 5-mm slice thickness, and the protocol was repeated every 6.83–9.15 s. Spatial drift correction, temporal smoothing, and signal intensity normalization were applied to generate videos of diffusion signal intensity changes for each coronal slice.

Results

Review of video data from five animals revealed ten discrete events consisting of focal diffusion restriction that propagated through cerebral cortex. All events originated in the cortex surrounding the sulcal clot, either in the gyrus (n = 4) or in the sulcal depth (n = 6). In six cases, two to three independent waves spread simultaneously in medial, lateral, and antero–posterior directions. Waves traveled within sulcal walls, traversed the depths of sulci to re-emerge on the adjacent gyrus, and, in three cases, spread fully around the dorsolateral convexity. One event spread deep to olfactory regions along midline cortex, and no events were observed contralateral to the subarachnoid clot.

Conclusions

Together, these results suggest that SDs in the injured gyrencephalic brain originate near the injury focus and can spread extensively through the cortex to wide and deep uninjured regions. These findings have implications for transient neurologic deficits in the neurocritically ill patient and relevance to patient monitoring and therapeutics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaufmann D, Theriot JJ, Zyuzin J, et al. Heterogeneous incidence and propagation of spreading depolarizations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16659496.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Santos E, Scholl M, Sanchez-Porras R, et al. Radial, spiral and reverberating waves of spreading depolarization occur in the gyrencephalic brain. Neuroimage. 2014;99C:244–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Santos E, Sanchez-Porras R, Sakowitz OW, et al. Heterogeneous propagation of spreading depolarizations in the lissencephalic and gyrencephalic brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:2639–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dreier JP, Lemale CL, Kola V, et al. Spreading depolarization is not an epiphenomenon but the principal mechanism of the cytotoxic edema in various gray matter structures of the brain during stroke. Neuropharmacology. 2018;134:189–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartings JA, Shuttleworth CW, Kirov SA, et al. The continuum of spreading depolarizations in acute cortical lesion development: examining Leao’s legacy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:1571–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Harreveld A, Khattab FI. Changes in cortical extracellular space during spreading depression investigated with the electron microscope. J Neurophysiol. 1967;30:911–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirov SA, Fomitcheva IV, Sword J. Rapid neuronal ultrastructure disruption and recovery during spreading depolarization-induced cytotoxic edema. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:5517–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy TH, Li P, Betts K, et al. Two-photon imaging of stroke onset in vivo reveals that NMDA-receptor independent ischemic depolarization is the major cause of rapid reversible damage to dendrites and spines. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1756–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Risher WC, Ard D, Yuan J, et al. Recurrent spontaneous spreading depolarizations facilitate acute dendritic injury in the ischemic penumbra. J Neurosci. 2010;30:9859–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Latour LL, Hasegawa Y, Formato JE, et al. Spreading waves of decreased diffusion coefficient after cortical stimulation in the rat brain. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Crespigny A, Rother J, van Bruggen N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral hemodynamics during spreading depression in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18:1008–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Umesh Rudrapatna S, Hamming AM, Wermer MJ, et al. Measurement of distinctive features of cortical spreading depolarizations with different MRI contrasts. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:591–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. James MF, Smith MI, Bockhorst KH, et al. Cortical spreading depression in the gyrencephalic feline brain studied by magnetic resonance imaging. J Physiol. 1999;519(Pt 2):415–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Busch E, Gyngell ML, Eis M, et al. Potassium-induced cortical spreading depressions during focal cerebral ischemia in rats: contribution to lesion growth assessed by diffusion-weighted NMR and biochemical imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:1090–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kastrup A, Neumann-Haefelin T, Moseley ME, et al. High speed diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of ischemia and spontaneous periinfarct spreading depression after thromboembolic stroke in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:1636–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Busch E, Beaulieu C, de Crespigny A, et al. Diffusion MR imaging during acute subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. Stroke. 1998;29:2155–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yenari MA, Onley D, Hedehus M, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of focal cerebral ischemia and cortical spreading depression under conditions of mild hypothermia. Brain Res. 2000;885:208–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartings JA, York J, Carroll CP, et al. Subarachnoid blood acutely induces spreading depolarizations and early cortical infarction. Brain. 2017;140:2673–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001;5:143–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, et al. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002;17:825–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowyer SM, Tepley N, Papuashvili N, et al. Analysis of MEG signals of spreading cortical depression with propagation constrained to a rectangular cortical strip. II. Gyrencephalic swine model. Brain Res. 1999;843:79–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sloan N, Jasper H. The identity of spreading depression and “suppression.” EEG Clin Neurophyiol. 1950;2:59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woitzik J, Hecht N, Pinczolits A, et al. Propagation of cortical spreading depolarization in the human cortex after malignant stroke. Neurology. 2013;80:1095–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hadjikhani N, Sanchez Del Rio M, Wu O, et al. Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4687–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. von Bornstadt D, Houben T, Seidel JL, et al. Supply-demand mismatch transients in susceptible peri-infarct hot zones explain the origins of spreading injury depolarizations. Neuron. 2015;85:1117–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumagai T, Walberer M, Nakamura H, et al. Distinct spatiotemporal patterns of spreading depolarizations during early infarct evolution: evidence from real-time imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:580–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hartings JA. Spreading depolarization monitoring in neurocritical care of acute brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23:94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dreier JP, Fabricius M, Ayata C, et al. Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: review and recommendations of the COSBID research group. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:1595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson D, Hartings J, Foreman B. First report of spreading depolarization correlates on scalp EEG confirmed with a depth electrode. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(Suppl 2):100–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AANS/CNS) Joint Section on Cerebrovascular Surgery Robert J. Dempsey, MD, Cerebrovascular Research Award (to CPC) and the Mayfield Education and Research Foundation (to JAH, CPC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JAH conceived the study, contributed to experimental design and execution, drafted the manuscript, and approval the final manuscript version. CPC contributed to experimental design, performed surgeries, collected data, edited the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript version. GL designed and executed the magnetic resonance imaging protocols, processed the data, analyzed results, contributed to manuscript preparation, and approved the final manuscript version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jed A. Hartings.

Ethics declarations

Copyright Statement

Christopher P. Carroll, LCDR, MC, USN, is a military service member. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that "Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government." Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a United States Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article reflect the results of research conducted by the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or United States Government.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no other conflicts to disclose.

Ethical Approval/Animal Rights

This study complies with all ethical guidelines and was conducted with approval and supervision of the institutional animal care and use committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the collection “Spreading Cortical Depolarization.”

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 330 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartings, J.A., Carroll, C.P. & Lee, G. Spreading Diffusion-Restriction Events in the Gyrencephalic Brain After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Revealed by Continuous Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Neurocrit Care 37 (Suppl 1), 60–66 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01376-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01376-0

Keywords

Navigation