Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spreading Depolarization After Chronic Subdural Hematoma Evacuation: Associated Clinical Risk Factors and Influence on Clinical Outcome

  • Spreading cortical depolarization
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 18 November 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition responsible for excess morbidity, particularly in the geriatric population. Recovery after evacuation is complicated by fluctuating neurological deficits in a high proportion of patients. We previously demonstrated that spreading depolarizations (SDs) may be responsible for some of these events. In this study, we aim to determine candidate risk factors for probable SD and assess the influence of probable SD on outcome.

Methods

We used two cohorts who underwent surgery for cSDH. The first cohort (n = 40) had electrocorticographic monitoring to detect SD. In the second cohort (n = 345), we retrospectively identified subjects with suspected SD based on the presence of transient neurological symptoms not explained by structural etiology or ictal activity on electroencephalography. We extracted standard demographic and outcome variables for comparisons and modeling.

Results

Of 345 subjects, 80 (23%) were identified in the retrospective cohort as having probable SD. Potential risk factors included history of hypertension, worse clinical presentation on the Glasgow Coma Scale, and lower Hounsfield unit density and volume of the preoperative subdural hematoma. Probable SD was associated with multiple worse-outcome measures, including length of stay and clinical outcomes, but not increased mortality. On a multivariable analysis, probable SD was independently associated with worse outcome, determined by the Glasgow Outcome Scale score at the first clinic follow-up (odds ratio 1.793, 95% confidence interval 1.022–3.146) and longer hospital length of stay (odds ratio 7.952, 95% confidence interval 4.062–15.563).

Conclusions

Unexplained neurological deficits after surgery for cSDH occur in nearly a quarter of patients and may be explained by SD. We identified several potential candidate risk factors. Patients with probable SD have worse outcomes, independent of other baseline risk factors. Further data with gold standard monitoring are needed to evaluate for possible predictors of SD to target therapies to a high-risk population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Balser D, Farooq S, Mehmood T, Reyes M, Samadani U. Actual and projected incidence rates for chronic subdural hematomas in United States Veterans Administration and civilian populations. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(5):1209–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta V, Harward SC, Sankey EW, Nayar G, Codd PJ. Evidence based diagnosis and management of chronic subdural hematoma: a review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;50:7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Link TW, Boddu S, Paine SM, Kamel H, Knopman J. Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a series of 60 cases. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(6):801–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rabinstein AA, Chung SY, Rudzinski LA, Lanzino G. Seizures after evacuation of subdural hematomas: incidence, risk factors, and functional impact. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(2):455–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartings JA, Shuttleworth CW, Kirov SA, Ayata C, Hinzman JM, Foreman B, et al. The continuum of spreading depolarizations in acute cortical lesion development: examining Leao’s legacy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37(5):1571–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moster ML, Johnston DE, Reinmuth OM. Chronic subdural hematoma with transient neurological deficits: a review of 15 cases. Ann Neurol. 1983;14(5):539–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Levesque M, Iorio-Morin C, Bocti C, Vezina C, Deacon C. Nonepileptic, stereotypical, and intermittent symptoms (NESIS) in patients with subdural hematoma: proposal for a new clinical entity with therapeutic and prognostic implications. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(1):96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammad LM, Abbas M, Shuttleworth CW, Ahmadian R, Bhat A, Hill DA, et al. Spreading depolarization may represent a novel mechanism for delayed fluctuating neurological deficit after chronic subdural hematoma evacuation. J Neurosurg. 2020;134(3):1294–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson AP, Abbas M, Alunday RL, Qeadan F, Shuttleworth CW. Spreading depolarization in acute brain injury inhibited by ketamine: a prospective, randomized, multiple crossover trial. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(5):1513–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson AP, Alchbli A, Hanggi D, Macdonald RL, Shuttleworth CW. Effect of locally delivered nimodipine microparticles on spreading depolarization in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(1):345–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartings JA, Li C, Hinzman JM, Shuttleworth CW, Ernst GL, Dreier JP, et al. Direct current electrocorticography for clinical neuromonitoring of spreading depolarizations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37(5):1857–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dreier JP, Fabricius M, Ayata C, Sakowitz OW, William Shuttleworth C, Dohmen C, et al. Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: review and recommendations of the COSBID research group. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37(5):1595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartings JA, Bullock MR, Okonkwo DO, Murray LS, Murray GD, Fabricius M, et al. Spreading depolarisations and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(12):1058–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dreier JP, Woitzik J, Fabricius M, Bhatia R, Major S, Drenckhahn C, et al. Delayed ischaemic neurological deficits after subarachnoid haemorrhage are associated with clusters of spreading depolarizations. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 12):3224–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hadjikhani N, Sanchez Del Rio M, Wu O, Schwartz D, Bakker D, Fischl B, et al. Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(8):4687–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Olesen J, Larsen B, Lauritzen M. Focal hyperemia followed by spreading oligemia and impaired activation of rCBF in classic migraine. Ann Neurol. 1981;9(4):344–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson A, Shuttleworth CW. Decreased cortical spreading depolarizations in neurosurgical patients being given ketamine. Future Neurol. 2013;8(1):17–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlson AP, William Shuttleworth C, Mead B, Burlbaw B, Krasberg M, Yonas H. Cortical spreading depression occurs during elective neurosurgical procedures. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(1):266–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sakowitz OW, Kiening KL, Krajewski KL, Sarrafzadeh AS, Fabricius M, Strong AJ, et al. Preliminary evidence that ketamine inhibits spreading depolarizations in acute human brain injury. Stroke. 2009;40(8):e519–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hertle DN, Dreier JP, Woitzik J, Hartings JA, Bullock R, Okonkwo DO, et al. Effect of analgesics and sedatives on the occurrence of spreading depolarizations accompanying acute brain injury. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 8):2390–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dietz RM, Weiss JH, Shuttleworth CW. Zn2+ influx is critical for some forms of spreading depression in brain slices. J Neurosci. 2008;28(32):8014–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Szabo I, Tóth OM, Torok Z, Varga DP, Menyhart A, Frank R, et al. The impact of dihydropyridine derivatives on the cerebral blood flow response to somatosensory stimulation and spreading depolarization. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176(9):1222–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlson AP, Hanggi D, Macdonald RL, Shuttleworth CW. Nimodipine reappraised: an old drug with a future. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(1):65–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ayata C, Jin H, Kudo C, Dalkara T, Moskowitz MA. Suppression of cortical spreading depression in migraine prophylaxis. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(4):652–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Peeters M, Gunthorpe MJ, Strijbos PJ, Goldsmith P, Upton N, James MF. Effects of pan- and subtype-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on cortical spreading depression in the rat: therapeutic potential for migraine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;321(2):564–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mokhtari M, Nayeb-Aghaei H, Kouchek M, Miri MM, Goharani R, Amoozandeh A, et al. Effect of memantine on serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and on the Glasgow coma scale in patients with moderate traumatic brain injury. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58(1):42–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dreier JP, Major S, Pannek HW, Woitzik J, Scheel M, Wiesenthal D, COSBID Study Group, et al. Spreading convulsions, spreading depolarization and epileptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Brain. 2012;135(Pt1):259–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Pedro Ramirez, William McKay, Benjamin Vidalis, Zoya Voronovich, Ross Green, and Jacqueline O’Neill for data collection and abstraction.

Funding

National Institutes of Health award P20 GM109089.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CM performed article drafting, data collection and analysis. HD performed data analysis and critical review. LM performed data collection and analysis. CWS performed study conception and critical review. MT performed critical review. YZ performed data analysis and study design. AAA performed data analysis. APC performed study concept and design, data analysis, drafting manuscript and editing. Authorship requirements have been met and the final manuscript has been approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew P. Carlson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval/informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (UNM HRPO# 16-352 and UNM HRPO# 15-564) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Collection on Spreading Cortical Depolarization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meadows, C., Davis, H., Mohammad, L. et al. Spreading Depolarization After Chronic Subdural Hematoma Evacuation: Associated Clinical Risk Factors and Influence on Clinical Outcome. Neurocrit Care 35 (Suppl 2), 105–111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01339-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01339-5

Keywords

Navigation