Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter is not Related to Intracranial Pressure in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients

A Letters to the editor to this article was published on 21 September 2020

A Response to Letter To The Editor to this article was published on 21 September 2020

A Response to Letter To The Editor to this article was published on 17 July 2020

A Letters to the editor to this article was published on 17 July 2020

A Letters to the editor to this article was published on 01 July 2020

A Letters to the editor to this article was published on 28 May 2020

A Response to Letter To The Editor to this article was published on 27 May 2020

Abstract

Background

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is essential after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) to prevent secondary brain insults and to tailor individualized treatments. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), measured using ultrasound (US), could serve as a noninvasive bedside tool to estimate ICP, avoiding the risks of hemorrhage or infection related to intracranial catheters. The aims of this study were twofold: first, to explore the reliability of US for measuring ONSD; second, to establish whether the US-ONSD can be considered a proxy for ICP in SAH patients early after bleeding. For the first aim, we compared the ONSD measurements given by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-ONSD) with the US-ONSD findings. For the second aim, we analyzed the relationship between US-ONSD measurements and ICP values.

Methods

Adult patients with diagnosis of aneurysmal SAH and external ventricular drainage system (EVD) were included. Ten patients were examined by MRI to assess ONSD, and the results were compared to the diameter given by US. In 20 patients, the US-ONSD values were related to ICP measured simultaneously through EVD. In ten of these patients, we explored the changes in the US-ONSD at the time of controlled and fairly rapid changes in ICP after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage.

Results

US-ONSD measurements at the bedside were accurate, very similar to the diameters measured by MRI (the mean difference in the Bland–Altman plot was 0.08 mm, 95% limits of agreement: − 1.13; + 1.23 mm). No clear relationship was detectable between the ICP and US-ONSD, and a linear regression model showed an angular coefficient very close to 0 (p > 0.05). US-ONSD and ICP values were in agreement after CSF drainage and shifts in ICP in a limited number of patients.

Conclusions

US-ONSD measurement does not accurately estimate ICP in SAH patients in the intensive care unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Chen S, Feng H, Sherchan P, Klebe D, Zhao G, Sun X, et al. Controversies and evolving new mechanisms in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;115:64–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Voldby B, Enevoldsen EM. Intracranial pressure changes following aneurysm rupture. Part 3: recurrent hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(6):784–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Prunell GF, Mathiesen T, Diemer NH, Svendgaard NA. Experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage: subarachnoid blood volume, mortality rate, neuronal death, cerebral blood flow, and perfusion pressure in three different rat models. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(1):165–75 (discussion 175-6).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Magni F, Pozzi M, Rota M, Vargiolu A, Citerio G. High-resolution intracranial pressure burden and outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2015;46(9):2464–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Heuer GG, Smith MJ, Elliott JP, Winn HR, LeRoux PD. Relationship between intracranial pressure and other clinical variables in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(3):408–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zoerle T, Lombardo A, Colombo A, Longhi L, Zanier ER, Rampini P, et al. Intracranial pressure after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(1):168–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000670.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, Vespa P, Bader MK, Brophy GM, et al. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(Suppl 2):S1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-014-0041-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Heldt T, Zoerle T, Teichmann D, Stocchetti N. Intracranial pressure and intracranial elastance monitoring in neurocritical care. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2019;4(21):523–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-060418-052257.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ortolano F, Carbonara M, Stanco A, Civelli V, Carrabba G, Zoerle T, et al. External ventricular drain causes brain tissue damage: an imaging study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(10):1981–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3291-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jamjoom AAB, Joannides AJ, Poon MT, Chari A, Zaben M, Abdulla MAH, Roach J, et al. Prospective, multicentre study of external ventricular drainage-related infections in the UK and Ireland. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(2):120–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-316415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, Corradi F, Bragazzi N, Padayachy L, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(8):1284–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5305-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Taljaard M, Kyeremanteng K, et al. Diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure in critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;24(366):l4225. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Robba C, Bacigaluppi S, Cardim D, Donnelly J, Bertuccio A, Czosnyka M. Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;134(1):4–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12527.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee S, Kim YO, Baek JS, Ryu JA. The prognostic value of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2360-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE, Robba C, McGlashan N, Needham E, Walland K, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter on computed tomography is correlated with simultaneously measured intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(9):1267–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3392-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Morgan WH, Balaratnasingam C, Lind CR, Colley S, Kang MH, House PH, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure and the eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1711–37. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Geeraerts T, Merceron S, Benhamou D, Vigué B, Duranteau J. Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure using ocular sonography in neurocritical care patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(11):2062–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1149-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Geeraerts T, Launey Y, Martin L, Pottecher J, Vigué B, Duranteau J, et al. Ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath may be useful for detecting raised intracranial pressure after severe brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(10):1704–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Neri L, Storti E, Lichtenstein D. Toward an ultrasound curriculum for critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 Suppl):S290–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hansen HC, Lagrèze W, Krueger O, Helmke K. Dependence of the optic nerve sheath diameter on acutely applied subarachnoidal pressure - an experimental ultrasound study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(6):e528–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02159.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bäuerle J, Niesen WD, Egger K, Buttler KJ, Reinhard M. Enlarged optic nerve sheath in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage despite normal intracranial pressure. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26(2):194–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tayal VS, Neulander M, Norton HJ, Foster T, Saunders T, Blaivas M. Emergency department sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter to detect findings of increased intracranial pressure in adult head injury patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(4):508–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Moretti R, Pizzi B. Optic nerve ultrasound for detection of intracranial hypertension in intracranial hemorrhage patients confirmation of previous findings in a different patient population. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009;21(1):16–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e318185996a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ, Jacobs TL. Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):506–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9606-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    del Saz-Saucedo P, Redondo-González O, Mateu-Mateu Á, Huertas-Arroyo R, García-Ruiz R, Botia-Paniagua E. J Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurol Sci. 2016;15(361):122–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.12.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rajajee V, Williamson CA, Fontana RJ, Courey AJ, Patil PG. Noninvasive intracranial pressure assessment in acute liver failure. Neurocrit Care. 2018;29(2):280–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0540-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the support of Dr. Luca Neri and Dr. Carmela Graci who offered their help for ultrasound training. The authors are grateful for the cooperation of Dr. Alessandra Merrino who helped in the acquisition of data and for the support of Dr. EJA Wiegers who helped in data analysis.

Funding

Support was provided by funds from Ricerca Corrente of Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NS, AC, TZ, and MC conceived and designed the study. AC, TZ, NS, ED, GC, SA, FT, and TB contributed to data analysis and interpretation. TZ, NS, AC, MC, FO, and ERZ critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Zoerle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript.

Ethical approval/informed consent

The institutional review board of the hospital (Ethics Committee Milan, Zone 1) approved the study, and written consent was obtained according to the regulations applied in our Institution. Number: ATTI 774/2016 - 24.05.2016

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was performed at the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 208 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zoerle, T., Caccioppola, A., D’Angelo, E. et al. Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter is not Related to Intracranial Pressure in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients. Neurocrit Care 33, 491–498 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00970-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Optic nerve sheath
  • Intracranial pressure
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Ultrasonography
  • Magnetic resonance imaging