The Physiology of the Apnea Test for Brain Death Determination in ECMO: Arguments for Blending Carbon Dioxide

Introduction

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of extracorporeal life support which can be utilized as a rescue modality in patients with treatment refractory cardiac or respiratory failure. ECMO removes deoxygenated blood from the venous circulation via large bore cannula where it is pumped through a membrane oxygenator which adds oxygen (O2) and removes carbon dioxide (CO2). The blood is then returned back to the circulation. Depending on the type of organ failure, the oxygenated blood can be returned to the venous circulation or the arterial circulation (VA ECMO). The patient’s underlying physiologic derangement ultimately determines the type of ECMO [1].

ECMO is becoming an increasingly common supportive modality. From 1998 to 2015, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization collected data on 65,171 patients undergoing support with ECMO with 53% neonates, 25% pediatric, and 23% adults. The indications for ECMO were respiratory failure (63%), cardiac failure (29%), and as a last resort in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (8%). The rate of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is also increasing. Although it may be associated with a survival rate of 27%, one in four patients may progress to brain death [2].

ECMO complicates not only traditional apnea testing as guided by the American Academy of Neurology guidelines, but also ancillary cerebral blood flow tests such as a cerebral angiogram. As part of the examination, an apnea test is performed using a CO2 rise to stimulate the respiratory centers. This is accomplished with O2 diffusion and has remained a safe method [3]. If clinical examination is inconclusive, ancillary testing may be considered. Transportation of ECMO patients can be difficult. Additionally, the perturbations in cerebral blood flow caused by ECMO have not been adequately investigated and will vary depending on the ECMO cannulation strategy [4].

In patients on ECMO, the aforementioned protocol for apnea test is not feasible as CO2 levels and oxygenation are related to both ECMO circuit and patient characteristics. The majority of ECMO centers in the USA use polymethylpentene (PMP) hollow fiber oxygenators. Blood flow passes on one side of the membrane, while sweep gas flows in the opposite direction. Via this crosscurrent exchange mechanism, O2 is added to the blood, while CO2 is removed. CO2 is twenty times more soluble than O2 and is transferred more easily through any type of membrane than O2 [5]. CO2 transfer is related to “sweep” gas flow (expressed in liters/minute), temperature, and pH [6, 7]. O2 transfer is governed by blood flow, hemoglobin concentration, blood temperature, “sweep” gas fraction of O2, and pre-membrane O2 saturation. The high degree of CO2 solubility combined with the high efficiency of CO2 removal of modern PMP hollow fiber oxygenators means that attempts at decreasing sweep gas flow often lead to a greater effect on oxygenation than CO2 [1, 8, 9].

We describe a case where apnea testing was performed on a patient on VA ECMO by adding CO2 in a controlled manner to the ECMO circuit. The ultimate outcome was a successful apnea test with a predictable rise in paCO2.

Case Report

A 45-year-old man suffered a cardiac arrest at home followed by recurrent ventricular fibrillation requiring cumulatively more than 60 min of CPR. Initial computed tomography (CT) scan of the head was normal. He was transferred to our tertiary care hospital and subsequently had recurrent arrest ultimately requiring VA ECMO which was initiated via femoral vein and femoral artery cannulation using a Maquet Cardiohelp device (Maquet Rotaflow Centrifugal Pump with Quadrox-I Oxygenator, Maquet Getinge, Gothenburg, Sweden). Transesophageal echocardiogram revealed biventricular akinesis. Because of the lack of left ventricular (LV) ejection, he was then taken to the operating room for central ECMO cannulation via right atrium and aorta. Due to LV distension, an additional cannula was placed into the LV to facilitate decompression. His chest was left open, and he returned to the intensive care unit (ICU).

In the ICU, temperature was targeted at 36 °C. Initially, he was sedated with propofol and fentanyl. Rhythm was controlled with lidocaine and procainamide. Low-dose norepinephrine and vasopressin were used to support his blood pressure. An endocardial biopsy was performed given uncertainty regarding etiology of cardiac arrest. When sedation was stopped, he remained comatose. His neurologic examination revealed absent motor response to pain stimuli but preservation of pupillary, corneal, and cough reflexes. Electroencephalography showed a burst suppression pattern without generalized periodic epileptic activity. Approximately 18 h later, he was noted to acutely have fixed and dilated pupils, loss of roving eye movements and no cough. Emergent CT scan of the head revealed new multifocal infarcts and diffuse cerebral edema with sulcal effacement and loss of the basal cisterns. This prompted a more formal examination.

A brain death assessment was performed after excluding possible confounders. There were no brainstem reflexes, no motor responses, and no evidence of spontaneous breathing effort. At that time, he was receiving ECMO support via VA ECMO with 60% FiO2, sweep gas flow of 2 L/min, pump speed of 3700 RPM, pump flow of 5.32 L/min, and ECMO cardiac index of 2.11 L/m2/min. Mechanical ventilator was set to controlled mode, tidal volume of 400 mL, respiratory rate of 12 breaths per minute, PEEP 5 cmH2O, 50% FiO2. Infusions included norepinephrine 0.1 mcg/kg/min, vasopressin 0.04 units/min, lidocaine 2 mg/min, procainamide 6 mg/min, heparin 5 units/kg/min, and insulin 0.5 units/h. He had pulsatility (cardiac ejection) above the ECMO circuit, and arterial blood pressure was 114/78 (89) mmHg, atrially paced rhythm at 80 beats per minute, and temperature of 37.2 °C.

Apnea testing was performed. Baseline arterial blood gas: pH 7.3, paCO2 46 mmHg, paO2 113 mmHg, and HCO3 26. A D-size CO2 tank used a CGA 940 Insufflation Yoke attached to a Western Medica Regulator connected to a Cole Palmer Flowmeter with a 0–200 mL/min range which was attached to the Sechrist Air–O2 mixer (Model 3500). The ECMO sweep flow and FiO2 were maintained at previous settings. The patient was removed from the mechanical ventilator, and no supplemental O2 was supplied. 100% CO2 was added to the ECMO circuit at an 8% sweep volume ratio (160 mL/min). The basis for this value is described in the discussion. He was closely observed for respiratory effort. Five minutes into the test, an arterial blood gas revealed a pH of 7.24, PaCO2 63 mmHg, PaO2 70 mmHg, and bicarbonate 27. The patient was observed for an additional 4 min, and no respiratory effort was noted. Throughout the test, the patient had no significant change in heart rate or arterial blood pressure. The patient was declared brain dead.

The family was subsequently consented for organ donation, and the patient was able to donate both kidneys and liver.

Discussion

Due to the complexities added to the brain death assessment of patients on ECMO, there continues to be uncertainty regarding the optimal approach to apnea testing and some patients who undergo brain death assessment may not undergo this essential test [10]. Our case report illustrates that by adding an 8% CO2 volume to the ECMO circuit, an arterial CO2 > 60 mmHg will reliably be obtained (Fig. 1). This finding should be independent of patient size, ECMO circuit volume or oxygenator surface area. This technique works without changing any of the ventilator settings although removal of the patient from the mechanical ventilator should still occur to simplify observation for respiratory efforts, and the addition of supplemental O2 via the endotracheal tube will lead to less chance of desaturation in patients with residual pulmonary blood flow. This technique leads to rapid change in CO2 and eliminates the “guessing” of how much the sweep gas flow needs to be lowered, which usually results in multiple blood gasses being drawn. Knowing reliably that a target CO2 levels will be reached allows efficient use of clinicians’ time and limits unnecessary serial blood draws. Once brain death is determined, these patients are well supported, while potential for organ donation is discussed with pertinent decision makers (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

An alternative approach to apnea testing on ECMO involves the addition of CO2 into the ECMO circuit as illustrated in this figure. This method should provide a reliable increase in CO2, and because ECMO sweep gas flow is not altered, oxygenation should be maintained

Fig. 2
figure2

Algorithm for apnea testing on a patient on ECMO using the addition of CO2 to the ECMO circuit in this figure

The blending of CO2 and O2 into the gaseous phase of an extracorporeal oxygenator has a long proven history of being a safe practice [11]. In cardiac surgery, the addition of CO2 enables a normal CO2 level in the blood of extracorporeal circuits with oxygenators and continues to be commonly performed today, especially when implementing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with the pH stat method. During hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, an arterial pH of approximately 7.40 and PaCO2 of 40 mmHg is maintained and corrected to the patient’s actual temperature. Because of the alkaline shift in pH during cooling due to increased CO2 solubility, CO2 is added to the sweep gas in order to maintain the constant “normal” range of values CO2. The total content of CO2 in the blood increases, producing a relative hypercarbia and respiratory acidosis. The percentage of CO2 in the ventilating gas that is necessary to maintain the PaCO2 at 40 mmHg in a normothermic patient is found by dividing 40 mmHg by the atmospheric pressure. At sea level, this is 40/760 or approximately 5–6%. If a PaCO2 of 65 is desired, as in apnea testing, then 65/760 denotes 8–9% CO2 endogenous mix.

Previous descriptions of apnea testing in ECMO have advocated for decreasing sweep gas flow which subsequently relies upon a passive increase in CO2 due to decreased CO2 removal by the ECMO oxygenator (Fig. 3). Using this methodology, a eucapnic state is first obtained by adjusting sweep flow. Subsequently, the patient is removed from the mechanical ventilator and connected to an inflating bag with continuous positive airway pressure. The ECMO sweep is then decreased to 0.5–1 L/min. Serial ABGs are performed to document hypercapnia, while the patient is observed for respiratory effort [12, 13]. Variations to this protocol include alternative forms of O2 delivery during the apnea test such as use of T-piece [14, 15], passing an O2 tube down the endotracheal tube [16], and foregoing the addition of supplemental O2 [17]. Yang et al. describe turning sweep flow to zero, but this method will likely lead to severe hypoxemia in most patients on VA ECMO [18]. In the largest reported series, 25 patients underwent brain death assessment while on ECMO by decreasing the sweep gas flow. Although hemodynamics and heart rhythm were relatively stable during the brain death assessments, severe hypoxia (paO2 < 40 mmHg) occurred in a considerable number (8%) of patients [19]. A report by Jarrah et al. outlines specific challenges in the pediatric population. One-third of the pediatric patients who underwent brain death assessment and apnea testing by decreasing sweep gas flow experienced severe hemodynamic instability and hypoxia [13]. The alternative approach involving the addition of exogenous CO2 to the ECMO circuit has also been discussed as a possibility by multiple authors [10, 17, 20]. Pirat et al. describe a case in which exogenous CO2 was slowly titrated into the ECMO membrane oxygenator. In this report, the patient was left on the mechanical ventilator and end-tidal CO2 was monitored, while exogenous CO2 was slowly titrated into the circuit [21]. Champigneulle et al. reported a similar protocol where CO2 is introduced via an 18 G needle inserted into the hose between the gas blender and oxygenator, while transcutaneous partial pressure of CO2 is monitored to assist in CO2 titration prior to obtain an arterial blood gas. In the eight patients, described minimal effects on oxygenation or hemodynamics occurred during the test. [22].

Fig. 3
figure3

In order to increase CO2 levels to adequate levels to perform a brain death assessment apnea test while the patient is on ECMO, sweep gas flow can be decreased with goal of decreased removal via membrane oxygenator. With decreased sweep gas flow, the delivery of O2 may be compromised

Conclusion

The utilization of ECMO to support patients with circulatory or respiratory compromise is becoming increasingly common. The apnea test is a key component of the evaluation for brain death. The majority of previous protocols for apnea testing while on ECMO involve turning ECMO sweep gas flow down to low levels which can lead to patient hypoxemia and difficulty in predicting when goal PaCO2 will be reached. The addition of 8% CO2 by volume to the ECMO circuit is a method to reliably increase PaCO2 by 20 mmHg without having to decrease sweep gas flows and compromise oxygenation.

References

  1. 1.

    Allen S, et al. A review of the fundamental principles and evidence base in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in critically ill adult patients. J Intensive Care Med. 2011;26(1):13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thiagarajan RR, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(3):778–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Daneshmand A, Rabinstein AA, Wijdicks EFM. The apnea test in brain death determination using oxygen diffusion method remains safe. Neurology. 2019;92(8):386–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Acharya J, et al. CT angiography of the head in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(4):773–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Drummond M, et al. Desenvolvimento tecnológico dos oxigenadores de membrana. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;20:432–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Park M, et al. Determinants of oxygen and carbon dioxide transfer during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in an experimental model of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54954.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    de Villiers Hugo J, et al. Quantification of carbon dioxide removal at low sweep gas and blood flows. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2017;49(4):257–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schmidt M, et al. Blood oxygenation and decarboxylation determinants during venovenous ECMO for respiratory failure in adults. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(5):838–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lim MW. The history of extracorporeal oxygenators. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(10):984–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Muralidharan R, et al. The challenges with brain death determination in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14(3):423–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sinard JM, Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): prolonged bedside cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 1990;5(4):239–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bein T, Muller T, Citerio G. Determination of brain death under extracorporeal life support. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(3):364–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jarrah RJ, et al. Developing a standard method for apnea testing in the determination of brain death for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a pediatric case series. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(2):e38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Smilevitch P, et al. Apnea test for brain death determination in a patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(2):215–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Goswami S, et al. Determination of brain death by apnea test adapted to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(2):312–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shah V, Lazaridis C. Apnea testing on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: case report and literature review. J Crit Care. 2015;30(4):784–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hoskote SS, Fugate JE, Wijdicks EF. Performance of an apnea test for brain death determination in a patient receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28(4):1027–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yang HY, et al. Experience of heart transplantation from hemodynamically unstable brain-dead donors with extracorporeal support. Clin Transplant. 2012;26(5):792–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Giani M, et al. Apnea test during brain death assessment in mechanically ventilated and ECMO patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(1):72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Saucha W, et al. Apnea test in the determination of brain death in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):368–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pirat A, et al. Apnea testing for diagnosing brain death during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28(1):e8–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Champigneulle B, et al. Efficiency and safety of apnea test process under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the most effective method remains questionable. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(6):1098–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding source for this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WBB helped in the care of the patient in the case report and preparation of manuscript; PS helped in the care of the patient in the case report and preparation of manuscript; EW helped in the care of the patient in the case report and preparation of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William B. Beam.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval/Informed consent

Upon admission the patient’s family consented to review of medical chart and extraction of information for research purposes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beam, W.B., Scott, P.D. & Wijdicks, E.F.M. The Physiology of the Apnea Test for Brain Death Determination in ECMO: Arguments for Blending Carbon Dioxide. Neurocrit Care 31, 567–572 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00784-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  • Extracorporeal life support
  • ECMO
  • Brain death
  • Apnea test