Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 106–117 | Cite as

Neuroimaging Findings in Sepsis-Induced Brain Dysfunction: Association with Clinical and Laboratory Findings

  • Günseli OrhunEmail author
  • Figen Esen
  • Perihan Ergin Özcan
  • Serra Sencer
  • Başar Bilgiç
  • Canan Ulusoy
  • Handan Noyan
  • Melike Küçükerden
  • Achmet Ali
  • Mehmet Barburoğlu
  • Erdem Tüzün
Original Article
  • 693 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Incidence and patterns of brain lesions of sepsis-induced brain dysfunction (SIBD) have been well defined. Our objective was to investigate the associations between neuroimaging features of SIBD patients and well-known neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration factors.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, 93 SIBD patients (45 men, 48 women; 50.6 ± 12.7 years old) were enrolled. Patients underwent a neurological examination and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Severity-of-disease scoring systems (APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II) and neurological outcome scoring system (GOSE) were used. Also, serum levels of a panel of mediators [IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, complement factor Bb, C4d, C5a, iC3b, amyloid-β peptides, total tau, phosphorylated tau (p-tau), S100b, neuron-specific enolase] were measured by ELISA. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was employed to available patients for assessment of neuronal loss pattern in SIBD.

Results

MRI of SIBD patients were normal (n = 27, 29%) or showed brain lesions (n = 51, 54.9%) or brain atrophy (n = 15, 16.1%). VBM analysis showed neuronal loss in the insula, cingulate cortex, frontal lobe, precuneus, and thalamus. Patients with abnormal MRI findings had worse APACHE II, SOFA, GOSE scores, increased prevalence of delirium and mortality. Presence of MRI lesions was associated with reduced C5a and iC3b levels and brain atrophy was associated with increased p-tau levels. Regression analysis identified an association between C5a levels and presence of lesion on MRI and p-tau levels and the presence of atrophy on MRI.

Conclusions

Neuronal loss predominantly occurs in limbic and visceral pain perception regions of SIBD patients. Complement breakdown products and p-tau stand out as adverse neuroimaging outcome markers for SIBD.

Keywords

Sepsis Brain dysfunction C5a Tau IL-12 Neuroimaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the personnel of the Multidisciplinary Critical Care Unit at the University of Istanbul for support and indebted to Bio. Fatma Vildan Adali for assistance.

Authors’ Contributions

GO, FE, SS, BB, and ET contributed to conception and design of the study. GO, PEÖ, and FE contributed to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data from sepsis patients. SS and MB contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of brain magnetic resonance imaging. BB and HN contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of voxel-based morphometry. ET, MK, and CU contributed to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data from ELISA studies. BB, AA, and ET performed the statistical analysis. GO, FE, SS, BB, and ET were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Source of support

This work was supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project Nos. 35165 and 46960.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the institutional review board (Approval No. 2013/98), and signed consent was obtained from patients or their relatives.

References

  1. 1.
    Iacobone E, Bailly-Salin J, Polito A, Friedman D, Stevens RD, Sharshar T. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy and its differential diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:S331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eidelman LA, Putterman D, Putterman C, Sprung CL. The spectrum of septic encephalopathy. Definitions, etiologies, and mortalities. JAMA. 1996;275:470–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004;291:1753–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hopkins RO, Jackson JC. Short- and long-term cognitive outcomes in intensive care unit survivors. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30:143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Girard TD, Jackson JC, Pandharipande PP, et al. Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1513–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010;304:1787–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gofton TE, Young GB. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:557–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sonneville R, Verdonk F, Rauturier C, et al. Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adam N, Kandelman S, Mantz J, Chrétien F, Sharshar T. Sepsis-induced brain dysfunction. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013;11:211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mazeraud A, Pascal Q, Verdonk F, Heming N, Chrétien F, Sharshar T. Neuroanatomy and physiology of brain dysfunction in sepsis. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37:333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oddo M, Taccone FS. How to monitor the brain in septic patients? Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:776–88.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001;286:2703–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond agitation–sedation scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Posner JB, Saper CB, Schiff ND, Plum F. Examination of the comatose patient. In: Posner JB, Saper CB, Schiff ND, Plum F, editors. Plum and Posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 38–87.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fisher RS, van Emde Boas W, Blume W, et al. Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: definitions proposed by the international league against epilepsy (ILAE) and the international bureau for epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsia. 2005;46:470–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1:480–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Kleinert G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging signal hyper intensities in the deep and subcortical white matter. A comparative study between stroke patients and normal volunteers. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:825–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharshar T, Carlier R, Bernard F, et al. Brain lesions in septic shock: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:798–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Piazza O, Cotena S, De Robertis E, Caranci F, Tufano R. Sepsis associated encephalopathy studied by MRI and cerebral spinal fluid S100B measurement. Neurochem Res. 2009;34:1289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morandi A, Gunther ML, Vasilevskis EE, et al. Neuroimaging in delirious intensive care unit patients: a preliminary case series report. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2010;7:28–33.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suchyta MR, Jephson A, Hopkins RO. Neurologic changes during critical illness: brain imaging findings and neurobehavioral outcomes. Brain Imaging Behav. 2010;4:22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polito A, Eischwald F, Maho AL, et al. Pattern of brain injury in the acute setting of human septic shock. Crit Care. 2013;17:R204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartynski WS, Boardman JF, Zeigler ZR, Shadduck RK, Lister J. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in infection, sepsis, and shock. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:2179–90.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fugate JE, Claassen DO, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF, Kozak OS, Rabinstein AA. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: associated clinical and radiologic findings. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:427–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gunther ML, Morandi A, Krauskopf E, et al. The association between brain volumes, delirium duration, and cognitive outcomes in intensive care unit survivors: the VISIONS cohort magnetic resonance imaging study*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2022–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Semmler A, Widmann CN, Okulla T, et al. Persistent cognitive impairment, hippocampal atrophy and EEG changes in sepsis survivors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:62–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sutter R, Chalela JA, Leigh R, et al. Significance of parenchymal brain damage in patients with critical illness. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23:243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ehler J, Barrett LK, Taylor V, et al. Translational evidence for two distinct patterns of neuroaxonal injury in sepsis: a longitudinal, prospective translational study. Crit Care. 2017;21:262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dantzer R. Cytokine-induced sickness behaviour: a neuroimmune response to activation of innate immunity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;500:399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Labrenz F, Wrede K, Forsting M, et al. Alterations in functional connectivity of resting state networks during experimental endotoxemia—an exploratory study in healthy men. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;54:17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benson S, Rebernik L, Wegner A, et al. Neural circuitry mediating inflammation-induced central pain amplification in human experimental endotoxemia. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;48:222–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sharshar T, Gray F, Lorin de la Grandmaison G, et al. Apoptosis of neurons in cardiovascular autonomic centres triggered by inducible nitric oxide synthase after death from septic shock. Lancet. 2003;362:1799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sharshar T, Annane D, de la Grandmaison GL, Brouland JP, Hopkinson NS, Françoise G. The neuropathology of septic shock. Brain Pathol. 2004;14:21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sonneville R, Derese I, Marques MB, et al. Neuropathological correlates of hyperglycemia during prolonged polymicrobial sepsis in mice. Shock. 2015;44:245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ward PA. The harmful role of C5a on innate immunity in sepsis. J Innate Immun. 2010;2:439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dofferhoff AS, de Jong HJ, Bom VJ, et al. Complement activation and the production of inflammatory mediators during the treatment of severe sepsis in humans. Scand J Infect Dis. 1992;24:197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Warford J, Lamport AC, Kennedy B, Easton AS. Human brain chemokine and cytokine expression in sepsis: a report of three cases. Can J Neurol Sci. 2017;44:96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weighardt H, Heidecke CD, Westerholt A, et al. Impaired monocyte IL-12 production before surgery as a predictive factor for the lethal outcome of postoperative sepsis. Ann Surg. 2002;235:560–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu HP, Shih CC, Lin CY, Hua CC, Chuang DY. Serial increase of IL-12 response and human leukocyte antigen-DR expression in severe sepsis survivors. Crit Care. 2011;15:R224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moreno SE, Alves-Filho JC, Alfaya TM, da Silva JS, Ferreira SH, Liew FY. IL-12, but not IL-18, is critical to neutrophil activation and resistance to polymicrobial sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. J Immunol. 2006;177:3218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Spolarics Z, Siddiqi M, Siegel JH, et al. Depressed interleukin-12-producing activity by monocytes correlates with adverse clinical course and a shift toward Th2-type lymphocyte pattern in severely injured male trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1722–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gasparotto J, Girardi CS, Somensi N, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products mediates sepsis-triggered amyloid-β accumulation, Tau phosphorylation, and cognitive impairment. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:226–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Puvenna V, Engeler M, Banjara M, et al. Is phosphorylated tau unique to chronic traumatic encephalopathy? phosphorylated tau in epileptic brain and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain Res. 2016;1630:225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kovacs GG, Rahimi J, Ströbel T, et al. Tau pathology in Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease revisited. Brain Pathol. 2017;27:332–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günseli Orhun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Figen Esen
    • 1
  • Perihan Ergin Özcan
    • 1
  • Serra Sencer
    • 2
  • Başar Bilgiç
    • 3
  • Canan Ulusoy
    • 4
  • Handan Noyan
    • 4
  • Melike Küçükerden
    • 4
  • Achmet Ali
    • 1
  • Mehmet Barburoğlu
    • 2
  • Erdem Tüzün
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Neuroradiology, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Behavioral Neurology and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Neuroscience, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations