Advertisement

Endocrine

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 4–14 | Cite as

Appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the management of hypothyroidism in pregnancy using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument

  • Yuan Fang
  • Liang Yao
  • Jing Sun
  • Jian Zhang
  • Yanxia Li
  • Ruifei Yang
  • Kehu Yang
  • Limin Tian
Review

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the quality of guidelines for the management of hypothyroidism in pregnancy.

Method

Systematic searches were conducted to identify hypothyroidism in pregnancy guidelines published in electronic databases and developers’ websites. Four reviewers independently evaluated eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Agreement among reviewers was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The number of recommendations, strength of recommendations, and levels of evidence were determined. The software used for analysis was SPSS version 12.0.

Results

Nine guidelines met the inclusion criteria and were appraised. The scope and purpose (65%) and clarity of presentation (70%) domains achieved relatively high scores, whereas the stakeholder involvement (41%), rigor of development (33%), applicability (36%), and editorial independence (31%) domains yielded low scores. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline ranked the highest, whereas the 2012 Chinese Society of Endocrinology (CSE) guideline ranked the lowest among all the guidelines. The British Thyroid Association (BTA) and ATA guidelines were strongly recommended as dependable and helpful references to aid clinical decisions for medical providers, whereas the CSE guideline was not recommended. Most recommendations of the guidelines were relatively consistent. However, the nine guidelines varied with respect to their recommendations on thyroid scanning, dose of levothyroxine (L-T4) treatment, and target thyroid-stimulating hormone(TSH) level of L-T4 therapy.

Conclusions

The quality of the guidelines on the management of hypothyroidism in pregnancy is highly variable. Additionally, these guidelines need significant improvement, especially in the rigor of development and applicability domains. Some improvements should be made to promote the development and implementation of guidelines, for example, conducting a comprehensive search strategy to include more potential evidence and establishing a standard grading system to evaluate the quality of evidence.

Keywords

Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument Clinical practice guidelines Hypothyroidism in pregnancy Quality assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Limin Tian and Kehu Yang for their help and support to the methodology and process.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Limin Tian. Performed the experiments: Yuan Fang. Analyzed the data: Jing Sun, Jian Zhang, Liang Yao, Ruifei Yang. Wrote the paper: Yuan Fang. Offered suggestions: Limin Tian, Kehu Yang, Liang Yao.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

12020_2018_1535_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (90 kb)
Supplementary Material
12020_2018_1535_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (57 kb)
Supplementary Material

References

  1. 1.
    Vandana et al., Thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and in postpartum period: treatment and latest recommendations. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 289(5), 1137–1144 (2014)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Negro, J.H. Mestman, Thyroid disease in pregnancy. Best Pract. Res Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 25(6), 927–943 (2011)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.F. Yazbeck, S.D. Sullivan, Thyroid disorders during pregnancy. Med Clin. North Am. 96(2), 235–256 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.E. Krassas, K. Poppe, D. Glinoer, Thyroid function and human reproductive health. Endocr. Rev. 31(5), 702–755 (2010)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.K. Alexander, Thyroid function: the complexity of maternal hypothyroidism during pregnancy. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5(9), 480–481 (2009)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Henrichs et al., Maternal thyroid function during early pregnancy and cognitive functioning in early childhood: the generation R study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95(9), 4227–4234 (2010)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Rashidian, Adapting valid clinical guidelines for use in primary care in low and middle income countries. Prim. Care Respir. J. 17(3), 136–137 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.A. Cluzeau et al., Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J. Qual. Health Care 11(1), 21–28 (1999)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Grilli et al., Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 355(9198), 103–106 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I.D. Graham, M.B. Harrison, Evaluation and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines. Evid. Based Nurs. 8(3), 68–72 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.D. Oxman, P. Glasziou, J.W. Williams Jr., What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations? Bmj 337, a2530 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.C. Brouwers et al., AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care. Prev. Med 51(5), 421–424 (2010)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.S. Burgers, Guideline quality and guideline content: are they related? Clin. Chem. 52(1), 3–4 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Jiang et al., A critical review of the Quality of Cough Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 150(4), 777–788 (2016)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Tian et al., Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on glioma. Neurosurg. Rev. 38(1), 39–47 (2015). discussion 47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Z. Xie et al., Appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on community-acquired pneumonia in children with AGREE II instrument. BMC Pediatr. 16, 119 (2016)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Vlayen et al., A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J. Qual. Health Care 17(3), 235–242 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.C. Brouwers et al., AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 182(18), E839–E842 (2010)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Lytras et al., Occupational Asthma Guidelines: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument. Occup. Environ. Med 71(2), 81–86 (2014)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Association, UK guidelines for the use of thyroid function tests. 《Journal Asian Earth Sciences》 20(5), 459–479 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.F. Muller et al., Thyroid function disorders--Guidelines of the Netherlands Association of Internal Medicine. Neth. J. Med 66(3), 134–142 (2008)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.R. Garber et al., Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr. Pract. 18(6), 988–1028 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    中华医学会内分泌学分会, 妊娠和产后甲状腺疾病诊治指南. 《中华内分泌代谢杂志》 28(5), 354–371 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. De Groot et al., Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97(8), 2543–2565 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Brenta et al., Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypothyroidism. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 57(4), 265–291 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Practice Bulletin No. 148: Thyroid disease in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 125(4), 996–1005 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    B. Biondi et al., Recommendations for treatment of hypothyroidism with levothyroxine and levotriiodothyronine: a 2016 position statement of the Italian Society of Endocrinology and the Italian Thyroid Association. J. Endocrinol. Invest 39(12), 1465–1474 (2016)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    E.K. Alexander et al., 2017 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease During Pregnancy and the Postpartum. Thyroid 27(3), 315–389 (2017)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Pattuwage et al., Management of spasticity in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Head. Trauma Rehabil. 32(2), E1–e12 (2017)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D.B. Sonawane et al., Appraisal of maternity management and family planning guidelines using the agree II instrument in India. Indian J. Public Health 59(4), 264–271 (2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S.A. Birken et al., Guidelines for the use of survivorship care plans: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument. Implement Sci. 10, 63 (2015)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. Gavriilidis, et al., Evaluation of the Current Guidelines for Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument. J. Hepatol. 67(5), 991–998 (2017).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M.W. van Tulder et al., Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain. Spine (Phila. Pa 1976) 29(17), E357–E362 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    T.L. Appleyard, C.H. Mann, K.S. Khan, Guidelines for the management of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a systematic appraisal of their quality. Bjog 113(7), 749–757 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Rusnak et al., Evaluation of traumatic brain injury guidelines using AGREE instrument. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 109(8), 374–380 (2008)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Neuman et al., Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study. Bmj 343, d5621 (2011)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    S.L. Norris et al., Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review. PLoS One 6(10), e25153 (2011)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    P.G. Shekelle et al., Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? Jama 286(12), 1461–1467 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. Acuna-Izcaray et al., Quality assessment of asthma clinical practice guidelines: a systematic appraisal. Chest 144(2), 390–397 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    P. Alonso-Coello et al., The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual. Saf. Health Care 19(6), e58 (2010)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    C.R. Gallardo et al., Quality of tuberculosis guidelines: urgent need for improvement. Int J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 14(8), 1045–1051 (2010)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J.A. Castillo-Bustos, J.L. Aguayo-Albasini, B. Flores-Pastor, [Clinic recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system]. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. 61(2), 61–63 (2014)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    S.P. Chauhan, S.C. Blackwell, SMFM adopts GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) for clinical guidelines. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 209(3), 163–165 (2013). http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.
  44. 44.
    G.H. Guyatt et al., What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? Bmj 336(7651), 995–998 (2008)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    M. Abalovich et al., Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92(8 Suppl), S1–S47 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    N. Singh Ospina et al., Is the endocrine research pipeline broken? A systematic evaluation of the Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines and trial registration. BMC Med 13, 187 (2015)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    L.A. Al-Ansary et al., A systematic review of recent clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis, assessment and management of hypertension. PLoS One 8(1), e53744 (2013)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    F. Campbell et al., Methods underpinning national clinical guidelines for hypertension: describing the evidence shortfall. BMC Health Serv. Res 6, 47 (2006)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    U. Siering et al., Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. PLoS One 8(12), e82915 (2013)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndocrinologyGansu Provincial HospitalLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Clinical Evidence based medicine centerGansu Provincial HospitalLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Clinical MedicineNingxia Medical UniversityYinchuanPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of UltrasonographyHebei Province Veterans HospitalBaodingPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Evidence-Based Medicine CenterSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou UniversityLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations