Eosinophilic Esophagitis: the Potential Role of Biologics in its Treatment
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disease of the esophagus, characterized by the presence of significant esophageal mucosal eosinophilic infiltrates. The clinical presentation of EoE in childhood may include failure to thrive and feeding intolerance. The complication of food impaction is often related to the presence of strictures or narrow caliber esophagus. Over the last decade, there has been tremendous progress in the field of eosinophilic disorders, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis. Conventional treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis involves topical swallowed steroids, systemic steroids, elimination diets, and/or esophageal dilation. However, treatment outcomes with the above modalities are not satisfactory for all patients with EoE and alternative treatments are clearly needed. There has been ongoing research targeting the treatment-refractory population of patients with EoE and the population with long-term consequences of the disease and its treatment. With the significant eosinophilic infiltration that characterizes EoE, anti-IL-5 therapies designed to target eosinophilic inflammation have been some of the most studied anti-inflammatory biologic therapies in EoE. In the studies published to date, while various IL-5 inhibitors have decreased the numbers of esophageal eosinophils, they have not depleted them to the levels consistent with histologic remission of EoE. As additional biologics that modulate Th2-mediated immunity are trialed for the treatment of EoE, we stand to learn more about the inflammatory factors mediating this challenging condition. In this review, we discuss the alternative modes of therapy in EoE that have emerged, with a focus on anti-IL-5 therapies and other biologics, their variation of success, and ultimately, the future of treatment in this field.
KeywordsEosinophilic esophagitis Eosinophils Anti-IL-5 Anti-IgE Anti IL-13 Anti-CRTH Anti-TNF-alpha
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, Gupta SK, Justinich C, Putnam PE, Bonis P, Hassall E, Straumann A, Rothenberg ME, First International Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Research Symposium (FIGERS) Subcommittees (2007) Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology 133(4):1342–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Blanchard C, Stucke EM, Rodriguez-Jimenez B, Burwinkel K, Collins MH, Ahrens A, Alexander ES, Butz BK, Jameson SC, Kaul A, Franciosi JP, Kushner JP, Putnam PE, Abonia JP, Rothenberg ME (2011) A striking local esophageal cytokine expression profile in eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127(1):208–217 217 e1-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Spergel JM, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Furuta GT, Markowitz JE, Fuchs G III, O’Gorman MA, Abonia JP, Young J, Henkel T, Wilkins HJ, Liacouras CA (2012) Reslizumab in children and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129(2):456–463 463 e1-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Identifier NCT00635089. Open-label extension study of reslizumab in pediatric subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis. National Library of Medicine: ClinicalTrials.gov.
- 16.Rothenberg ME, Klion AD, Roufosse FE, Kahn JE, Weller PF, Simon HU, Schwartz LB, Rosenwasser LJ, Ring J, Griffin EF, Haig AE, Frewer PI, Parkin JM, Gleich GJ, Mepolizumab HES Study Group (2008) Treatment of patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome with mepolizumab. N Engl J Med 358(12):1215–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Straumann A, Conus S, Grzonka P, Kita H, Kephart G, Bussmann C, Beglinger C, Smith DA, Patel J, Byrne M, Simon HU (2010) Anti-interleukin-5 antibody treatment (mepolizumab) in active eosinophilic oesophagitis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Gut 59(1):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Assa'ad AH, Gupta SK, Collins MH, Thomson M, Heath AT, Smith DA, Perschy TL, Jurgensen CH, Ortega HG, Aceves SS (2011) An antibody against IL-5 reduces numbers of esophageal intraepithelial eosinophils in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology 141(5):1593–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Rothenberg ME, Wen T, Greenberg A, Alpan O, Enav B, Hirano I, Nadeau K, Kaiser S, Peters T, Perez A, Jones I, Arm JP, Strieter RM, Sabo R, Gunawardena KA (2015) Intravenous anti-IL-13 mAb QAX576 for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 135(2):500–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Hirano I et al (2018) RPC4046, a monoclonal antibody against IL13, reduces histologic and endoscopic activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. GastroenterologyGoogle Scholar
- 30.Hirano I et al (2017) Dupilumab efficacy and safety in adult patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled phase 2 trial. World Congress of Gastroenterology at ACG, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
- 31.Identifier NCT03633617. Study to determine the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult and adolescent patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). National Library of Medicine: ClinicalTrials.gov.
- 33.Identifier NCT03656380. Mepo for EoE study. National Library of Medicine: ClinicalTrials.gov.