Identifying Candidate Reprogramming Genes in Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Factor-based induced reprogramming approaches have tremendous potential for human regenerative medicine, but the efficiencies of these approaches are still low. In this study, we analyzed the global transcriptional profiles of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs) and mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) from seven different labs and present here the first successful clustering according to cell type, not by lab of origin. We identified 2131 different expression genes (DEs) as candidate pluripotency-associated genes by comparing mESCs/miPSCs with somatic cells and 720 DEs between miPSCs and mESCs. Interestingly, there was a significant overlap between the two DE sets. Therefore, we defined the overlap DEs as “consensus DEs” including 313 miPSC-specific genes expressed at a higher level in miPSCs versus mESCs and 184 mESC-specific genes in total and reasoned that these may contribute to the differences in pluripotency between mESCs and miPSCs. A classification of “consensus DEs” according to their different expression levels between somatic cells and mESCs/miPSCs shows that 86% of the miPSC-specific genes are more highly expressed in somatic cells, while 73% of mESC-specific genes are highly expressed in mESCs/miPSCs, indicating that the miPSCs have not efficiently silenced the expression pattern of the somatic cells from which they are derived and failed to completely induce the genes with high expression levels in mESCs. We further revealed a strong correlation between oocyte-enriched factors and insufficiently induced mESC-specific genes and identified 11 hub genes via network analysis. In light of these findings, we postulated that these key hub genes might not only drive somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) reprogramming but also augment the efficiency and quality of miPSC reprogramming.
KeywordsMouse embryonic stem cells Mouse induced pluripotent stem cells Oocyte-enrich factors Transcriptome Reprogramming
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(J1210069).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- 5.Hu, B. Y., Weick, J. P., Yu, J., et al. (2010). Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(9), 4335–4340.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Brambrink, T., Hochedlinger, K., Bell, G., & Jaenisch, R. (2006). ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(4), 933–938.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Liu, Y., Cheng, D., Li, Z., Gao, X., & Wang, H. (2012). The gene expression profiles of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated by a non-integrating method are more similar to embryonic stem cells than those of iPSCs generated by an integrating method. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 35(3), 693–700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar