Advertisement

Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 184, Issue 4, pp 1094–1105 | Cite as

Molecular Characterization of Mosquitocidal Toxin (Surface Layer Protein, SLP) from Bacillus cereus VCRC B540

  • Chinnasamy Mani
  • Jeyaperumal Selvakumari
  • YeonSoo Han
  • YongHun Jo
  • Krishnaraj Thirugnanasambantham
  • Somaiah Sundarapandian
  • Subbiah Poopathi
Article

Abstract

A marine Bacillus cereus (VCRC B540) with mosquitocidal effect was recently reported from red snapper fish (Lutjanus sanguineous) gut and surface layer protein (S-layer protein, SLP) was reported to be mosquito larvicidal factor. In this present study, the gene encoding the surface layer protein was amplified from the genomic DNA and functionally characterized. Amplification of SLP-encoding gene revealed 1,518 bp PCR product, and analysis of the sequence revealed the presence of 1482 bp open reading frame with coding capacity for a polypeptide of 493 amino acids. Phylogenetic analysis revealed with homology among closely related Bacillus cereus groups of organisms as well as Bacillus strains. Removal of nucleotides encoding signaling peptide revealed the functional cloning fragment of length 1398 bp. Theoretical molecular weight (51.7 kDa) and isoelectric point (5.99) of the deduced functional SLP protein were predicted using ProtParam. The amplified PCR product was cloned into a plasmid vector (pGEM-T), and the open reading frame free off signaling peptide was subsequently cloned inpET-28a(+) and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). The isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-induced recombinant SLP was confirmed using western blotting, and functional SLP revealed mosquito larvicidal property. Therefore, the major findings revealed that SLP is a factor responsible for mosquitocidal activity, and the molecular characterization of this toxin was extensively studied.

Keywords

Surface layer protein B. cereus Cloning Mosquito L. sanguineus Phylogenetic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the Pondicherry Central University for providing the student fellowship for registering his PhD program. The authors acknowledge Dr. P. Jambulingam, the Director of VCRC, Pondicherry-605006, for the permission to undertake DST-overseas fellowship. The authors thank to Department of Science and Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology of Government of India and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and Ministry of Science, and ICT and Future Planning of the Republic of Korea under sanction order INT/ROK/IKRI-09/2014 dated on January 01, 2015.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12010_2017_2602_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 1106 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Mani, C., Thirugnanasambantham, K., Sundarapandian, S. M., & Poopathi, S. (2015). Identification and characterization of a novel marine Bacillus cereus VCRC-B540 for mosquito control. BioControl, 60, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of head bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Federici, B. A., Park, H. W., & Sakano, Y. (2006). Insecticidal protein crystals of Bacillus thurigiensis. In J. M. Shively (Ed.), Inclusions in prokaryotes (pp. 195–236). Berlin: Springer-verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poopathi, S., & Archana, B. (2012). Optimization of medium composition for the production of mosquitocidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. I J Exp Biol, 50(1), 65–71.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poopathi, S., & Abidha, S. (2009). Cost effective medium for the production of bio-pesticide in mosquito control. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102, 1423–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hofte, H., & Whitley, H. R. (1989). Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiological Reviews, 53, 242–255.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poopathi, S., Nielsen-LeRoux, C., & Charles, J.-F. (2002). Alternative methods for preservation of mosquito larvae to study binding mechanism of Bacillus sphaericus toxin. J Invert Pathol, 79, 132–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oei, C., Hindley, J., & Berry, C. (1992). Binding of purified Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin and its deletion derivatives to Culex quinquefasciatus gut: elucidation of functional binding domains. Journal of General Microbiology, 138, 1515–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allieve, M. C., Palomino, M. M., Prado Acosta, M., Lanti, L., Ruzal, S. M., & Sanchez Rivas, C. (2014). Contribution of S-layer proteins to the mosquitocidal activity of Lysinibacillussphaericus. PloS One, 9(10), e111114.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.phone.0111114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sleytr, U. B. (1978). Regular arrays of macromolecules on bacterial cell walls: structure, chemistry assembly and function. International Review of Cytology, 53, 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sleytr, U. B., Sara, M., Pum, D., Schuster, B., Messner, P., & Schaffer, C. (2002). Self-assembly protein systems: microbial S-layers. In A. Steinbuchel & S. R. Fahnestock (Eds.), Biopolymers polyamides and complex proteinaceous materials I Vol. 1st edn (pp. 285–338). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Houwink, A. L., & Le Poole, J. B. (1952). Einestruktur in der ZellmembraneinerBakterie. PhysikalischeVerhandlungen, 3, 98.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerhardt, P. (1967). Cytology of Bacillus anthracis., 26, 1507–1517.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koinig, H., et al. (2010). Prokaryotic cell wall compounds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05062-6_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malkinski, L., Camely, R. E., Celinski, Z., Winningham, T. A., Whipple, S. G., & Douglas, K. (2003). Hexagonal lattice of 10 nm magnetic dots. Journal of Applied Physics, 93, 7325–7327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malcolm, A. J., Messner, P., Sleytr, U. B., Smith, R. H., & Unger, F. M. (1992). In U. B. Sleytr, P. Messner, D. Pum, & M. Sara (Eds.), Application potentials in biotechnology and biosensors. London: Springer-Verlag in press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fahmy, K., Merroun, M., Pollmann, K., Raff, J., & Savchuk, O. (2006). Secondary structure and Pd(II) coordination in S-layer proteins from Bacillus sphaericus studied by infrated and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Biophys, 91, 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sleytr, U. B. & Sara, M. (1988). US Patent Number, 4, 752,395.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chinnasamy Mani
    • 1
  • Jeyaperumal Selvakumari
    • 1
  • YeonSoo Han
    • 2
  • YongHun Jo
    • 2
  • Krishnaraj Thirugnanasambantham
    • 1
  • Somaiah Sundarapandian
    • 3
  • Subbiah Poopathi
    • 1
  1. 1.Vector Control Research Centre (Indian Council of Medical Research), Department of Health ResearchMinistry of Health and Family WelfarePuducherryIndia
  2. 2.Division of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Environmentally-Friendly Agriculture (IEFA), College of Agriculture and Life ScienceChonnam National UniversityGwangjuRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, School of Life-SciencesPondicherry UniversityPuducherryIndia

Personalised recommendations