Abstract
Xylose, mannose, and galactose (xmg) recovery from empty fruit bunches using acetic acid-assisted hydrothermal (AAH) fractionation method was investigated. Acetic acid has been demonstrated to be effective in xmg recovery in comparison with the liquid hot-water (LHW) fractionation. The maximum xmg recovery yield (50.7 %) from the empty fruit bunch (EFB) was obtained using AAH fractionation at optimum conditions (6.9 wt.% acetic acid at 170 °C and for 18 min); whereas, only 16.2 % of xmg recovery was obtained from the LHW fractionation at the same reaction conditions (170 °C and 18 min). Releasing out the glucose from EFB was kept at low level (<1.0 %) through all tested conditions and consequently negligible 5-HMF and formic acid were analyzed in the hydrolyzate. The production of furfural was also resulted with extremely low level (1.0 g/L).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lin, T., Rodríguez, L. F., Shastri, Y. N., Hansen, A. C., & Ting, K. C. (2014). Integrated strategic and tactical biomass–biofuel supply chain optimization. Bioresource Technology, 156, 256–266.
Kajaste, R. (2014). Chemicals from biomass-managing greenhouse gas emissions in biorefinery production chains—a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75, 1–10.
Yang, B., & Wyman, C. E. (2008). Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2, 26–40.
Garrote, G., Dominguez, H., & Parajo, J. C. (1999). Hydrothermal processing of lignocellulosic materials. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 57, 191–202.
Aita, G. M., & Kim, M. (2010). Pretreatment technologies for the conversion of lignocellulosic materials to bioethanol. ACS Symposium Series, 1058, 117–145.
Felix, E., & Tilley, D. R. (2009). Integrated energy, environmental and financial analysis of ethanol production from cellulosic switch grass. Energy, 34, 410–436.
Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Holtzapple, M., Lee, Y. Y., & Ladisch, M. (2005). Features of promising technologies for pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 96, 673–686.
Tan, S. S., Li, D. Y., Jiang, Z. Q., Zhu, Y. P., Shi, B., & Li, L. T. (2008). Production of xylobiose from the autohydrolysis explosion liquor of corncob using Thermotoga maritime xylanase B (XynB) immobilized on nickel-chelated Eupergit C. Bioresource Technology, 99, 200–204.
Vazquez, M. J., Garrote, G., Alonso, J. L., Dominguez, H., & Parajo, J. C. (2005). Refining of autohydrolysis liquors for manufacturing xylooligosaccharides: evaluation of operational strategies. Bioresource Technology, 96, 889–896.
Kabel, M. A., Bos, G., Zeevalking, J., Voragen, A. G. J., & Schol, H. A. (2007). Effect of pretreatment severity on xylan solubility and enzymatic breakdown of the remaining cellulose from wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 98, 2034–2042.
Lee, J. M., Shi, J., Venditti, R. A., & Jameel, H. (2009). Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 100, 6434–6441.
Kootstra, A. M. J., Beeftink, H. H., Scott, E. L., & Sanders, J. P. M. (2009). Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 46, 126–131.
Zhao, X., & Liu, D. (2013). Kinetic modeling and mechanisms of acid-catalyzed delignification of sugarcane bagasse by aqueous acetic acid. Bioenergy Research, 6, 436–447.
Qin, L., Liu, Z. H., Li, B. Z., Dale, B. E., & Yuan, Y. J. (2012). Mass balance and transformation of corn stover by pretreatment with different dilute organic acids. Bioresource Technology, 112, 319–326.
Xu, J., Thomsen, M. H., & Thomsen, A. B. (2010). Investigation of acetic acid-catalyzed hydrothermal pretreatment on corn stover. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 86, 509–516.
Jin, F. M., Zhou, Z. Y., Moriya, T., Kishida, H., Higashijima, H., & Enomoto, H. (2005). Controlling hydrothermal reaction pathways to improve acetic acid production from carbohydrate biomass. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 1893–1902.
Jin, F. M., Zhou, Z. Y., Kishita, A., Enomoto, H., Kishida, H., & Moriya, T. (2007). A new hydrothermal process for producing acetic acid from biomass waste. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 85(2), 201–206.
Zabihi, S., Alinia, R., Esmaeilzadeh, F., & Kalajahi, J. F. (2010). Pretreatment of wheat straw using steam, steam/acetic acid and steam/ethanol and its enzymatic hydrolysis for sugar production. Biosystems Engineering, 105, 288–297.
Abad, S., Alonso, J. L., Santos, V., & Parajó, J. C. (1997). Furfural from wood in catalyzed acetic acid media: a mathematical assessment. Bioresource Technology, 62, 115–122.
Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., & Crocker, D. (2011). Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass, NREL. TP-510-42618.
Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., & Scarlata, C. (2008). Determination of sugar, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples, NREL. TP-510-42623.
Shamsudin, S., Shah, U. K. M., Zainudin, H., Aziz, S. A., Kamal, S. M. M., Shirai, Y., & Hassan, M. A. (2012). Effect of steam pretreatment on oil palm empty fruit bunch for the production of sugars. Biomass Bioenergy, 36, 280–288.
Hong, J. Y., Kim, Y. S., & Oh, K. K. (2013). Fractionation and delignification of empty fruit bunches with low reaction severity for high sugar recovery. Bioresource Technology, 146, 176–183.
Lee, J. Y., Ryu, H. J., & Oh, K. K. (2013). Acid-catalyzed hydrothermal severity on the fractionation of agricultural residues for xylose-rich hydrolyzates. Bioresource Technology, 132, 84–90.
Acknowledgments
The present research was conducted by the research fund of Dankook University in 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D.Y., Um, B.H. & Oh, K.K. Acetic acid-assisted hydrothermal fractionation of empty fruit bunches for high hemicellulosic sugar recovery with low byproducts. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 176, 1445–1458 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1656-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1656-5