Utilization of Makgeolli Sludge Filtrate (MSF) as Low-Cost Substrate for Bacterial Cellulose Production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus
- 470 Downloads
Search for efficient low-cost substrate/additives are gaining significant impetus in bacterial cellulose (BC) production. Makgeolli sludge (a traditional Korean wine distillery waste) is enriched with organic acid, alcohol, and sugar. Using makgeolli sludge filtrate (MSF) and Hestrin–Schramm (HS) medium (g/l of distilled water: glucose, 10.0; peptone, 5.0; yeast extract, 5.0; disodium phosphate, 2.7; citric acid, 1.15; pH 5.0), two different media—namely the modified HS media (ingredients of HS media except glucose dissolved in MSF) and mixed modified HS media (equal volume mixture of original and modified HS media)—were formulated. BC production with Gluconacetobacter xylinus was studied using the two above referred medium. Keeping HS medium as reference, effect of initial pH, glucose, ethanol, and organic acid concentration on BC production was also studied. It suggests that increasing initial glucose (up to 25 g/l) though improves BC production but results in poor BC yield above 15 g/l of glucose. However, addition of alcohol (up to 1%v/v) or citric acid (up to 20 mM) escalate productivity up to four and two times, respectively. In both modified HS media and mixed modified HS medium, BC production was four to five times higher than that of original HS medium. Even MSF alone surpassed HS medium in BC production. Scanning electron microscopy showed that BC microfibrils from MSF based media were several micrometers long and about 25–60 nm widths. X-ray diffraction patterns suggested the produced BC were of cellulose I polymorph.
KeywordsBacterial cellulose G. xylinus Makgeolli sludge XRD analysis
This study was financially supported by KRF on enhancement of CO2 biomineralization employing alkaline metal releaser along with partial contribution of INHA University Research Grant.
- 2.Bielecki, S., Krystynowicz, A., Turkiewicz, M., & Kalinowska, H. (2005). Bacterial cellulose. In A. Steinbüchel (Ed.), Biopolymers online. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.Google Scholar
- 5.Bielecki, S., Krystynowicz, A., Turkiewicz, M., & Kalinowska, H. (2004). Bacterial cellulose. In E. Vandamme, S. De Baets, & A. Steinbüchel (Eds.), Polysaccharides I: Polysaccharides from Prokaryotes (pp. 37–46). WILEY-VCH.Google Scholar
- 7.Klemm, D., Schumann, D., Kramer, F., Hessler, N., Hornung, M., Schmauder, H. P., & Marsch, S. (2006). Nanocelluloses as innovative polymers in research and application. In Polysaccharides II (Vol. 205, pp. 49–96). Springer-Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
- 19.Mahadevaswamy, U. R., Rastogi, N. K., & Appaiah, K. A. A. (2011). Statistical optimization of medium composition for bacterial cellulose production by gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk extract—An agro-industry waste. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21(7), 739–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Keshk, S., Razek, T., & Sameshima, K. (2006). Bacterial cellulose production from beet molasses. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5(17).Google Scholar
- 29.Kim, W.-S. (2011). Utilization of Makgeolli sludge for growth of probiotic bacteria. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science, 38(3), 473–477.Google Scholar
- 30.Kim, M. S., Lee, T. J., Yoon, Y. S., Lee, I. G., & Moon, K. W. (2001). Hydrogen production from food processing wastewater and sewage sludge by anaerobic dark fermentation combined with photo-fermentation. In J. Miyake, T. Matsunaga, & A. San Pietro (Eds.), Biohydrogen II: An approach to environmentally acceptable technology (pp. 263–272). Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Chawla, P. R., Bajaj, I. B., Survase, S. A., & Singhal, R. S. (2009). Microbial cellulose: Fermentative production and applications. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 47(2), 107–124.Google Scholar