Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Bioactive Studies Between Wild Plant and Callus Culture of Tephrosia tinctoria Pers.

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tephrosia tinctoria, a perennial under shrub of Fabaceae family, is endemic to Western Ghats. In this study, friable whitish yellow callus was developed after 45 days using Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2.0 mg/l) + 6-benzylaminopurine (0.5 mg/l) in various explants of T. tinctoria. The ethyl acetate extracts of leaf (LE), stem (SE), and root (RE) were compared with leaf (LCE), stem (SCE), and root (RCE) derived callus, for antioxidant and antiproliferative activities. The SE possessed the highest phenolic and flavonoid content among all the extracts tested and showed a significant antioxidant assays. The study of anticancer activity on human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell line revealed that the callus extracts especially RCE possessed significant inhibition of cell growth (IC50 20 μg/ml) at 72 h treatment period on analysis with MTT assay. The apoptotic cell death was observed through DNA fragmentation analysis in HepG2 cells treated with the T. tinctoria extracts. The gas chromatography–mass spectrometry finger printing profile showed that more than 60 % percentage of metabolites are similar in both SE and SCE. The higher percentage area of antioxidant compound (stigmast-4-en-3-one) was observed in SE (2.01 %) and higher percentage area of anticancer compound (phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)) in SCE (0.91 %). In addition to that, callus extracts contain squalene, which is used for target deliver and also used as anticancer drug. Thus, the present study revealed that the T. tinctoria has potent antioxidant and antiproliferative activity and the callus culture can be used for the production of the bioactive compounds due to the endemic nature of this plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sherman, M. (2010). Seminars in Liver Disease, 30, 3–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carr, C., Ng, J., & Wigmore, T. (2008). Current Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 19, 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seifried, H. E., Anderson, D. E., Fisher, E. I., & Milner, J. A. (2007). The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 18, 567–579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swamy, S. M. K., & Tan, B. K. H. (2000). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 70, 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaskins, M.H., White, A.C., Martin, F.W., Delfel, N.E., Ruppel, E.G. & Barnes, D.K. (1972). Technical Bulletin, 1445.

  6. Sarin, J. P. S., Singh, S., Garg, H., Khanna, N. M., & Dhar, M. M. (1976). Phytochemistry, 15(1), 232–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Y. L. (1978). Asian J Pharm, 3(4), 18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentley, M. D., Hassanali, A., Lwande, W., Njoroge, P. E. W., & Yatagai, M. (1987). Insect Sci Appl, 8(1), 85–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gokhale, A. B., & Saraf, M. N. (2000). Indian Drugs, 37, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thammanna, R., Narayana, K., & Madhava, C. K. (1994). Angiospermic wealth of Tirumala (p. 49). Tirupati: TTD.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gulecha, V. & Sivakumar, T. (2011). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 526–529.

  12. Amin, I., Norazaidah, Y., & Emmy, H. K. I. (2006). Food Chemistry, 94, 47–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meda, A., Lamien, C. E., Romito, M., Millogo, J., & Nacoulma, O. G. (2005). Food Chemistry, 91, 571–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan, Z., Wang, Z., & Liu, J. (2011). Food Chemistry, 129, 402–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hua-Nan, L., Fei-Fei, N., Wei, L., Qin-Sheng, D., Na, L., Qi, Q., et al. (2009). Toxicology, 257, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alessandra, R., Venera, C., Laura, L., Luca, V., Angelo, V., & Juan, A. G. (2005). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 100, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elumalai, S., Ramganesh, S., Prakasam, V., & Prabhakaran, M. (2011). J Advanced Laboratory Research in Biology, 2, 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chao-Lin, K., Jun-Yi, C., Hung-Chi, C., Sushim, K. G., Hsiao-Sung, C., Emily, C. C., et al. (2011). Botanical Studies, 52, 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hazeena, M. S., & Sulekha, G. R. (2008). Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 46(1–2), 79–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, W. Y., Cai, Y. Z., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Nutrition and Cancer, 62(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta, S., & Prakash, J. (2009). Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 64, 39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sies, H. (1993). Mutation Research, 299, 183–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, S. H., Fang, Z. X., Lu, Y., Chen, J. C., Liu, D. H., & Ye, X. Q. (2009). Food Chemistry, 112(2), 394–399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Priyanka, S., Naresh, K., Utpal, B., & Rakhi, C. (2010). Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 15, 1038–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eschenfeldt, W. H., & Berger, S. L. (1987). Methods Enzymology, 152, 335–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakahira, H., Enari, M., & Nagata, S. (1998). Nature, 391, 96–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sri, N., Abdul, M., Sim, K. S., Norhanom, A. W., & Hashim, Y. (2009). Molecules, 14, 1713–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruby, L. A., Morrison, E. Y. S. A., & Muraleedharan, G. N. (2004). Phytotherapy Research, 18(5), 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lakshmi, P. T. V., & Rajalakshmi, P. (2011). International research journal of pharmacy, 2(5), 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Senthilkumar, S., Devaki, T., Manohar, B. M., & Babu, M. S. (2006). Clinica Chimica Acta, 364, 335–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fresco, P., Borges, F., Marques, M. P. M., & Diniz, C. (2010). Current Pharmaceutical Design, 16(1), 114–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, S. J., Chang, S. P., Lin, D. L., Wang, S. S., Hou, F. F., & Ng, L. T. (2009). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 47, 1132–1138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Department of Science and Technology (SERC), India (sanction no. SR/FT/LS-043/2007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Sureshkumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajaram, K., Moushmi, M., Velayutham Dass Prakash, M. et al. Comparative Bioactive Studies Between Wild Plant and Callus Culture of Tephrosia tinctoria Pers.. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 171, 2105–2120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0444-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0444-3

Keywords

Navigation