Skip to main content
Log in

l-Glutamine and l-Glutamic Acid Facilitate Successful Agrobacterium Infection of Recalcitrant Tea Cultivars

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first step in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection of plants is the establishment of cell–cell contact between the two partners. However, failure to establish such contact makes many plants and explants recalcitrant to A. tumefaciens infection. Tea is one such example where even the popular inducer, acetosyringone failed to facilitate A. tumefaciens infection due to the presence of high amounts of bactericidal/bacteriostatic polyphenols. Quinones are formed as a result of polyphenols oxidation. They cause tissue browning and necrosis during the process of transformation, and in turn prevent A. tumefaciens infection. Compounds such as polyphenol adsorbents, i.e., polyvinylpyrrolidone and charcoal, and antioxidants like cysteine and ascorbic acid were screened to overcome tissue browning. Although these compounds enhanced the growth of A. tumefaciens, these failed to facilitate the infection of the leaves of either Kangra Jat, Tocklai Variety-1, UPASI-9, UPASI-10, and Stock-449 cultivars of tea. On the contrary, the presence of filter sterilized l-glutamine and l-glutamic acid in the co-cultivation medium facilitated successful A. tumefaciens infection of recalcitrant tea leaves. l-Glutamine and glutamic acid form harmless adducts by binding to quinones. Therefore, their presence in the co-cultivation medium allowed the tea leaves to remain living and appealing to the infecting A. tumefaciens. Successful A. tumefaciens infection of tea leaves was confirmed by positive signals in GUS assay, PCR, and Dot blot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton, C. M., Frary, A., Lewis, C., & Tanskley, S. D. (1996). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 9975–9979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koncz, C., Martini, N., Mayerghofer, R., Koncz-Kalman, Z., Korber, H., Redei, G. P., & Schell, J. (1989). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 86, 8467–8471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingelbrecht, I., Breyne, P., Vancomperonolle, A., van Montagu, J. M., & Depicker, A. (1991). Gene, 109, 239–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw, C. H. (1991). Bio Essays, 13, 25–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, N. (2003). M.Sc. Thesis, Himachal Pradesh Krishi Viswavidyalay, Palampur, India

  6. Kumar, N., Pandey, S., Bhattacharya, A., & Ahuja, P. S. (2004). Journal of Biosciences, 29, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chakrabarty, R., Viswakarma, N., Bhat, S. R., Kirti, P. B., Singh, B. D., & Chopra, V. L. (2002). Journal of Biosciences, 27, 495–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Das, D. K., Reddy, M. K., Upadhyaya, K. C., & Sopory, S. K. (2002). Plant. Cell Reports, 20, 999–1005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dada Kuta, D., & Tripathy, L. (2005). African Journal of Biotechnology, 4, 752–757.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hatanaka, A., Kajiwara, T., Sekiya, J., & Kido, Y. (1977). Phytochemistry, 16, 1828–1829.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhattacharya, A., Sood, P., & Citovsky, V. (2010). Molecular Plant Pathology, 11, 705–719.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Biao, X., Toru, K., Jian, X., & Yongyan, B. (1998). American Society of Plant Physiology (Plant Biol) Abstr No: 314

  13. Sandal, I., Saini, U., Lacroix, B., Bhattacharya, A., Ahuja, P. S., & Citovsky, V. (2007). Plant Cell Reports, 26, 169–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vancanneyt, G., Schmidt, R., O’Connor-Sanchez, A., Willmitzer, L., & Rocha-Sosa, M. (1990). Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 220, 245–250.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. A. (1962). Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jefferson, R. A. (1987). Plant Molecular Biology Reports, 5, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Doyle, J. J., & Doyle, J. L. (1990). Focus, 12, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, L. C., Li, Y. L., Huang, B. L., Kuo, C. I., & Shaw, J. F. (2002). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Plant, 38, 358–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, Z. T., Dhekney, S., Dutt, M., Van Amman, M., Tattersali, J., Kelley, K. T., & Gray, D. J. (2006). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Plant, 42, 220–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sandal, I., Bhattacharya, A., Saini, U., Kaur, D., Sharma, S., Gulati, A., Kumar, J. K. K., Kumar, N., Dayma, J., Das, P., Singh, B., & Ahuja, P. S. (2011). BMC Chemical Biology, 11, 1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dŏgan, S., Turan, P., Dŏgan, M., Alkan, M., & Arslan, O. (2007). European Food Research and Technology, 225, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gulati, A., Rajkumar, S., Karthigeyan, S., Sud, R. K., Vijayan, D., Thomas, J., Rajkumar, R., Das, S. C., Tamuly, P., Hazarika, M., & Ahuja, P. S. (2009). Chemistry and Biodiversity, 6, 1042–1052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaiser, D. (2006). Prokaryotes, 1, 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thank Dr. P.S. Ahuja, Director, CSIR-IHBT for providing the necessary facility for carrying out this work. Nitish Kumar also acknowledges the financial assistance from the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitish Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, N., Gulati, A. & Bhattacharya, A. l-Glutamine and l-Glutamic Acid Facilitate Successful Agrobacterium Infection of Recalcitrant Tea Cultivars. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 170, 1649–1664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0286-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0286-z

Keywords

Navigation