Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of SOS2 and a Novel PMP3-1 Gene Expression in Two Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Lines Differing in Salt Tolerance

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gene expression pattern of two important regulatory proteins, salt overly sensitive 2 (SOS2) and plasma membrane protein 3-1 (PMP3-1), involved in ion homeostasis, was analyzed in two salinity-contrasting sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) lines, Hysun-38 (salt tolerant) and S-278 (moderately salt tolerant). The pattern was studied at selected time intervals (24 h) under 150 mM NaCl treatment. Using reverse transcription PCR, SOS2 gene fragment was obtained from young leaf and root tissues of opposing lines while that for PMP3-1 was obtained only from young root tissues. Both tolerant and moderately tolerant lines showed a gradual increase in SOS2 expression in sunflower root tissues. Leaf tissues showed the gradually increasing pattern of SOS2 expression in tolerant plants as compared to that for moderately tolerant ones that showed a relatively lower level of expression for this gene. We found the highest level of PMP 3-1 expression in the roots of tolerant sunflower line at 6 and 12 h postsalinity treatment. The moderately tolerant line showed higher expression of PMP3-1 at 12 and 24 h after salt treatment. Overall, the expression of genes for both the regulator proteins varied significantly in the two sunflower lines differing in salinity tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niu, X., Bressan, R. A., Hasegawa, P. M., & Pardo, J. M. (1995). Plant Physiology, 109, 735–742.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Serrano, R., & Rodriguez, P. L. (2002). EMBO Reports, 2, 116–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu, J. K. (2003). Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 6, 441–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasegawa, P. M., Bressan, R. A., Zhu, J. K., & Bohnert, H. J. (2000). Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 51, 463–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chinnusamy, V., Jagendorf, A., & Zhu, J. K. (2005). Crop Science, 45, 437–448.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, J., Ishitani, M., Halfter, U., Kim, C. S., & Zhu, J. K. (2000). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 97, 3730–3734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Inada, M., Ueda, A., Shi, W., & Takabe, T. (2005). Planta, 220, 395–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Navarre, C., & Goffeau, A. (2000). The EMBO Journal, 19, 2515–2524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Imai, R., Koike, M., Sutoh, K., Kawakami, A., Torada, A., & Oono, K. (2005). Molecular and General Genomics, 274, 445–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Medina, J., Ballesteros, M. L., & Salinas, J. (2007). Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 4333–4346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008). The New Phytologist, 179, 945–963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain, K., Nisar, M. F., Majeed, A., Nawaz, K., Bhatti, K. H., Afghan, S., Shahazad, A., & Zia-ul-Hussnian, S. (2010). African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 416–422.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maas, E. V., & Hoffmann, G. J. (1977). Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 103, 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shahbaz, M., Ashraf, M., Akram, N. A., Hanif, A., Hameed, S., Joham, S., & Rehman, R. (2011). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 33, 1113–1122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoagland, D. R., & Arnon, D. I. (1950). University of California. Agricultural Experimental Station: University of California Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, J., Wu, W., Zuo, K., Fei, J., Sun, X., Lin, J., Li, X., & Tang, K. (2004). Cell and Molecular Biology, 9, 465–473.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Taji, T., Seki, M., Satou, M., Sakurai, T., Kobayashi, M., Ishiyama, K., Narusaka, Y., Narusaka, M., Zhu, J. K., & Shinozaki, K. (2004). Plant Physiology, 135, 1697–1709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gong, Q., Li, P., Ma, S., Rupassara, S. I., & Bohnert, H. J. (2005). The Plant Journal, 44, 826–839.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Halfter, U., Ishitani, M., & Zhu, J. K. (2000). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 3730–3734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, Q., Chen, Z. Z., Zhou, X. F., Yin, H. B., Li, X., Xin, X. F., Hong, X. H., Zhu, J. K., & Gong, Z. (2009). Molecular Plant, 2, 22–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant to Department of Botany, UAF, Pakistan from the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (research grant no. 20–403).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amer Jamil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saadia, M., Jamil, A., Ashraf, M. et al. Comparative Study of SOS2 and a Novel PMP3-1 Gene Expression in Two Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Lines Differing in Salt Tolerance. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 170, 980–987 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0240-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0240-0

Keywords

Navigation