Abstract
This study compared the effectiveness of different biosorbents, viz. materials commonly present in natural treatment systems (Scenedesmus quadricauda and reed) and commonly produced fruit wastes (orange and banana peel) to remove Cr(III) and Cr(VI) from a synthetic wastewater simulating tannery wastewater. The Cr(III) removal efficiency followed the order S. quadricauda > orange peel > banana peel > reed, whereas the Cr(VI) removal followed the order banana peel > S. quadricauda > reed > orange peel. The chromium biosorption kinetics were governed by the intraparticle diffusion mechanism. Isotherm data obtained using the different biosorbents were fitted to the Langmuir, Freundlich, and SIPS models, revealing that the experimental data followed most closely the monolayer sorption theory-based Langmuir model than the other models. The maximum Cr(III) sorption capacity, calculated using the Langmuir model, was found to be 12 and 9 mg/g for S. quadricauda and orange peel, respectively, and the maximum Cr(VI) sorption capacity calculated for banana peel was 3 mg/g. The influence of biosorbent size, pH, solid–liquid ratio, and competing ions were examined for Cr(III) biosorption by S. quadricauda and orange peel and for Cr(VI) sorption by banana peel. The solution pH was found to be the most influential parameter affecting the biosorption process: whereas pH 5 was found to be optimum for maximum removal of Cr(III), Cr(VI) was best removed at a pH as low as 3. Interference to chromium sorption by various ions revealed that Cr(III) binding onto orange peel occurs through electrostatic forces, whereas Cr(VI) binding onto banana peel through non-electrostatic forces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wu, Y., Zhang, S., Guo, X., & Huang, H. (2008). Bioresource Technology, 99, 7709–7715.
Ortega, L. M., Lebrun, R., Noël, I. M., & Hausler, R. (2005). Separation and Purification Technology, 44, 45–52.
Low, K. S., Lee, C. K., & Ng, A. Y. (1999). Bioresource Technology, 68, 205–208.
Fahim, N. F., Barsoum, B. N., Eid, A. E., & Khalil, M. S. (2006). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136, 303–309.
Tadesse, I., Isoaho, S. A., Green, F. B., & Puhakka, J. A. (2006). Bioresource Technology, 97, 529–534.
Gode, F., & Pehlivan, E. (2006). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136, 330–337.
Apte, A. D., Verma, S., Tare, V., & Bose, P. (2005). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 121, 215–222.
Gowd, S., Reddy, M. R., & Govil, P. K. (2010). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 174, 113–121.
Allen, S. J., & Brown, P. A. (1995). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 62, 17–24.
Blázquez, G., Hernáinz, F., Calero, M., Martín-Lara, M. A., & Tenorio, G. (2009). Chemical Engineering Journal, 148, 473–479.
Mwinyihija, M. (2010). Ecotoxicological diagnosis in the tanning industry (1st ed.). New York: Springer.
Schiewer, S., & Patil, S. B. (2008). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 157, 8–17.
Ergene, A., Ada, K., Tan, S., & Katircioğlu, H. (2009). Desalination, 249, 1308–1314.
Elangovan, R., Philip, L., & Chandraraj, K. (2008). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152, 100–112.
Barrera, H., Ureña-Núñez, F., Bilyeu, B., & Barrera-Díaz, C. (2006). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136, 846–853.
Ahalya, N., Ramachandra, T. V., & Kanamadi, R. D. (2003). Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 7, 71–79.
Pakshirajan, K., Izquierdo, M., Lens, P.N.L. (2013). Separation Science and Technology, 48, 1111–1122.
Ho, Y. S., & McKay, G. (1999). Process Biochemistry, 34, 451–465.
Zhou, L., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., & Huang, Q. (2009). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161, 995–1002.
Ncibi, M. C., Mahjoub, B., & Seffen, M. (2008). Bioresource Technology, 99, 5582–5589.
Chaithanya, T. K., & Yedla, S. (2010). Environmental Technology, 31, 1495–1505.
Balasubramanian, S., & Pugalenthi, V. (1999). Talanta, 50, 457–467.
Zubair, A., Bhatti, H. N., Hanif, M. A., & Shafqat, F. (2008). Water Air Soil Poll., 191, 305–318.
Malkoc, E., & Nuhoglu, Y. (2007). Separation and Purification Technology, 54, 291–298.
Sahmoune, M. N., Louhab, K., & Boukhiar, A. (2011). Environmen. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 30, 284–293.
Marín, A. B. P., Aguilar, M. I., Meseguer, V. F., Ortuño, J. F., Sáez, J., & Lloréns, M. (2009). Chemical Engineering Journal, 155, 199–206.
Agarwal, G. S., Bhuptawat, H. K., & Chaudhari, S. (2006). Bioresource Technology, 97, 949–956.
Memon, J. R., Memon, S. Q., Bhanger, M. I., El-Turki, A., Hallam, K. R., & Allen, G. C. (2009). Colloids and Surfaces B, 70, 232–237.
Murphy, V., Hughes, H., & McLoughlin, P. (2007). Water Research, 41, 731–740.
Albadarin, A. B., Al-Muhtaseb, A. A. H., Walker, G. M., Allen, S. J., & Ahmad, M. N. M. (2011). Desalination, 274, 64–73.
Vijayaraghavan, K., Padmesh, T. V. N., Palanivelu, K., & Velan, M. (2006). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 133, 304–308.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the BOYSCAST fellowship (SR/BY/L-19/10), Department of Science and Technology (India) and the Netherlands Fellowship Programme, offered by the Dutch government for students of developing countries, for their support in carrying out this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pakshirajan, K., Worku, A.N., Acheampong, M.A. et al. Cr(III) and Cr(VI) Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Cheaply Available Fruit Waste and Algal Biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 170, 498–513 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0202-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0202-6