Skip to main content
Log in

Purification and Characterization of Chitinase from Paenibacillus sp. D1

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 56.56-kDa extracellular chitinase from Paenibacillus sp. D1 was purified to 52.3-fold by ion exchange chromatography using SP Sepharose. Maximum enzyme activity was recorded at pH 5.0 and 50 °C. MALDI-LC-MS/MS analysis identified the purified enzyme as chitinase with 60% similarity to chitinase Chi55 of Paenibacillus ehimensis. The activation energy (E a) for chitin hydrolysis and temperature quotient (Q 10) at optimum temperature was found to be 19.14 kJ/mol and 1.25, respectively. Determination of kinetic constants k m, V max, k cat, and k cat/k m and thermodynamic parameters ΔH*, ΔS*, ΔG*, ΔG*E–S, and ΔG*E–T revealed high affinity of the enzyme for chitin. The enzyme exhibited higher stability in presence of commonly used protectant fungicides Captan, Carbendazim, and Mancozeb compared to control as reflected from the t 1/2 values suggesting its applicability in integrated pest management for control of soil-borne fungal phytopathogens. The order of stability of chitinase in presence of fungicides at 80 °C as revealed from t 1/2 values and thermodynamic parameters E a(d) (activation energy for irreversible deactivation), ΔH*, ΔG*, and ΔS* was: Captan > Carbendazim > Mancozeb > control. The present study is the first report on thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of chitinase from Paenibacillus sp. D1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gohel, V., Singh, A., Maisuria, V., Phadnis, A., & Chhatpar, H. S. (2006). African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nawani, N. N., Prakash, D., & Kapadnis, B. P. (2010). World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 26, 1509–1517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aam, B. B., Heggset, E. B., Norberg, A. L., Sørlie, M., Vårum, K. M., & Eijsink, V. G. H. (2002). Marine Drugs, 8, 1482–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balsubramanium, N., Juliet, G. A., Srikalaivani, P., & Lalithakumari, D. (2003). Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 49, 263–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rhishipal, R., & Philip, R. (1998). Bioresource Technology, 65, 255–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharya, D., Nagpure, A., & Gupta, R. K. (2007). Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 27, 21–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. von der Weid, I., Alviano, D. S., Santos, A. L. S., Soares, R. M. A., Alviano, C. S., & Seldin, L. (2003). Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95, 1143–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budi, S. W., van Tuinen, D., Arnould, C., Dumas-Gaudut, E., Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., & Gianinazzi, S. (2000). Applied Soil Ecology, 15, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, A. K., Ghodke, I., & Chhatpar, H. S. (2009). Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 358–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vieille, C., & Zeikus, G. J. (2001). Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 65, 1–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh, A. K., Mehta, G., & Chhatpar, H. S. (2009). Letters in Applied Microbiology, 49, 708–714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vyas, P., & Deshpande, M. V. (1989). The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 35, 343–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Nature, 277, 680–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sambrook, J., & Russell, D. W. (2001). Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dixon, M., & Webb, E. C. (1979). Enzymes. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eyring, H., & Stearn, A. E. (1939). Chemical Reviews, 24, 253–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laidler, K. J., & Peterman, B. F. (1979). Methods in Enzymology, 63, 234–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen, M. H., Malter, A. J., Jensen, M. H., & Malter, A. J. (1995). Protected agriculture: A global review (pp. 75–76). Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guetsky, R., Shtienberg, D., Elad, Y., Fischer, E., & Dinoor, A. (2002). Phytopathology, 92, 976–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muhammad, R., Raheela, P., Muhammad, R. J., Habibullah, N., & Muhammad, H. R. (2007). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41, 558–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobsen, B. J., Zidack, N. K., & Larson, B. J. (2004). Phytopathology, 94, 1272–1275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiewnick, S., Jacobsen, B. J., Braun-Kiewnick, A., Eckhoff, J. L. A., & Bergman, J. W. (2001). Plant Disease, 85, 718–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Someya, N., Tsuchiya, K., Yoshida, T., Tsujimoto-Noguchi, M., & Sawada, H. (2007). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 17, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D’Amico, S., Marx, J.-C., Gerday, C., & Feller, G. (2003). The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278, 7891–7896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by UGC/DRS Phase-II, New Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hari S. Chhatpar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, A.K., Chhatpar, H.S. Purification and Characterization of Chitinase from Paenibacillus sp. D1. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 164, 77–88 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9116-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9116-8

Keywords

Navigation