Formic Acid as a Potential Pretreatment Agent for the Conversion of Sugarcane Bagasse to Bioethanol
- 745 Downloads
In recent years, growing attention has been focused on the use of lignocellulosic biomass as a feedstock for the production of ethanol, a possible renewable alternative to fossil fuels. Several pretreatment processes have been developed for decreasing the biomass recalcitrance, but only a few of them seem to be promising. In this study, effect of various organic solvents and organic acids on the pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse was studied. Among the different organic acids and organic solvents tested, formic acid was found to be effective. Optimization of process parameters for formic acid pretreatment was carried out. The structural changes before and after pretreatment was investigated by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis. The X-ray diffraction profile showed that the degree of crystallinity was more for pretreated biomass than that of untreated. The FTIR spectra shown at the stretching of hydrogen bonds of pretreated sugarcane bagasse arose at higher number. It also revealed that the cellulose content in the solid residue increased because the hemicelluloses fraction in raw materials was released by acid hydrolytic reaction.
KeywordsSugarcane bagasse Bioethanol Formic acid Pretreatment Lignocellulosic biomass
Authors are grateful to the Technology Information, Forecasting and Assessment Council (TIFAC), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for financial support to the Centre for Biofuels at NIIST.
- 1.Pandey, A., Biswas, S., Sukumaran, R. K., & Kaushik, N. (2009). Study on availability of Indian biomass resources for exploitation: a report based on a nation-wise survey. New Delhi: Published by TIFAC.Google Scholar
- 2.Sukumaran, R. K., Surender, V. J., Sindhu, R., Binod, P., Janu, K. U., Sajna, K. V., et al. (2010). Bioresource Technology, 101(14), 4767–4774.Google Scholar
- 3.Bryant, C., & Yassumoto, W. Y. (2009). International Sugar Journal, 111, 696–700.Google Scholar
- 8.Patel, S. J., Onkarappa, R., & Shobha, K. S. (2007). Electronic Journal of Environmental Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 6, 1921–1926.Google Scholar
- 10.Argyropoulos, D., & Argyropoulos, D. S. (2008). US Patent No. US2008190013-A1.Google Scholar
- 13.Muurinen, E. (2000). Department of Process, Engineering, University of Oulu, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar
- 15.Sun, Y., Lin, L., Deng, H. B., Li, J. Z., He, B. H., Sun, R. C., et al. (2008). Bioresources, 3, 297–315.Google Scholar
- 20.McDonough, T. J. (1993). Tappi Journal, 76, 186–193.Google Scholar
- 33.Hsu, T.,Gua, G.,Chen, W., & Hwang, W. (2009). Bioresource Technology, (in press).Google Scholar
- 36.Mantanis, G. I., Young, R. A., & Rowell, R. M. (1995). Cellulose, 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
- 37.Binod, P., Sindhu, R., Singhania, R. R., Surender, J. S., Devi, L., Nagalakshmi, S., et al. (2010). Bioresource Technology, 101(14), 4826–4833.Google Scholar