Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bioconversion of Kraft Paper Mill Sludges to Ethanol by SSF and SSCF

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paper mill sludge is a solid waste material composed of pulp residues and ash generated from pulping and paper making processes. The carbohydrate portion of the sludge has chemical and physical characteristics similar to pulp. Because of its high carbohydrate content and well-dispersed structure, the sludges can be biologically converted to value-added products without pretreatment. In this study, two different types of paper mill sludges, primary sludge and recycle sludge, were evaluated as a feedstock for bioconversion to ethanol. The sludges were first subjected to enzymatic conversion to sugars by commercial cellulase enzymes. The enzymatic conversion was inefficient because of interference by ash in the sludges with the enzymatic reaction. The main cause was that the pH level is dictated by CaCO3 in ash, which is two units higher than the pH optimum of cellulase. To alleviate this problem, simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation (SSCF) using cellulase (Spezyme CP) and recombinant Escherichia coli (ATCC-55124), and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) using cellulase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ATCC-200062) were applied to the sludges without any pretreatment. Ethanol yields of 75–81% of the theoretical maximum were obtained from the SSCF on the basis of total carbohydrates. The yield from the SSF was also found to be in the range of 74–80% on the basis of glucan. The SSCF and SSF proceeded under stable condition with the pH staying near 5.0, close to the optimum for cellulase. Decrease of pH occurred due to carbonic acid and other organic acids formed during fermentation. The ash was partially neutralized by the acids produced from the SSCF and SSF and acted as a buffer to stabilize the pH during fermentation. When the SSF and SSCF were operated in fed-batch mode, the ethanol concentration in the broth increased from 25.5 and 32.6 g/L (single feed) to 45 and 42 g/L, respectively. The ethanol concentration was limited by the tolerance of the microorganism in the case of SSCF. The ethanol yield in fed-batch operation decreased to 68% for SSCF and 70% for SSF. The high-solids condition in the bioreactor appears to create adverse effects on the cellulase reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fan, Z., & Lynd, L. R. (2006). Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 30(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott, G. M., Abubakr, S., & Smith, A. (1995). Proceedings of the 1995 international environmental conference May 7–10 (pp. 269–279). Atlanta, GA: Tappi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sjöde, A., Alriksson, B., Jönsson, L. J., & Nilvebrant, N. (2007). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 136–140, 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lark, N., Xia, Y., Qin, C.-G., Gong, C. S., & Tsao, G. T. (1997). Biomass Bioenergy, 12, 135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2002). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 59, 618–628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sjöström, E. (1993). Wood chemistry: fundamentals and applications (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fan, Z., & Lynd, L. R. (2006). Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 30(1), 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffries, T. W., & Schartman, R. (1999). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 78(1–3), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan, Z., South, C., Lyford, K., Munsie, J., Walsum, P., & Lynd, L. R. (2003). Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 26(2), 93–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marques, S., Alves, L., Roseiro, J. C., & Gírio, F. M. (2008). Biomass Bioenergy, 32, 400–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lynd, L. R., Lyford, K., South, C. R., van Walsum, P., & Levenson, K. (2001) TAPPI 84, 50; full text at http://www.tappi.org.

  12. NREL (2008) Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP), National Renewable Energy Laboratory,Golden,CO. Available from: http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html .

  13. Acid-Insoluble Ash in Wood, Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard, Test Method T 244 cm-99.

  14. Biermann, C. J. (1996). Handbook of pulping and papermaking (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saddler, J. N., & Gregg, D. J. (1998). In Bruce, A., & Palfreyman, J. W. (Eds.), Forest products biotechnology. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 183–207.

  16. Varga, E., Szengyel, Z., & Reczey, K. (2002). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 98/100, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kraemer, J. T., & Bagley, D. M. (2006). Biotechnological Letters, 28, 1485–1491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohta, K., Beall, D. S., Mejia, J. P., Shanmugam, K. T., & Ingram, L. O. (1991). Applied Environmental Microbiology, 57(4), 893–900.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Elshafei, A. M., Vega, L. L., Kalsson, K. T., Clausen, E. C., & Gaddy, J. L. (1991). Bioresource Technology, 35, 73–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Paul, J., & Varma, A. K. (1990). Biotechnological Letters, 12(1), 61–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Copa-Patiño, J. L., Kim, Y. G., & Broda, P. (1993). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 40(1), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rapp, P., & Wagner, F. (1986). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 51(4), 746–752.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Öhgren, K., Bura, R., Saddler, J. N., & Zacchi, G. (2007). Bioresource Technology, 98, 2503–2510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao, Z., Zhang, X., Gregg, D. J., & Saddler, J. N. (2004). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 113/116, 1115–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nigam, P., & Prabhu, K. A. (1991). Journal of Basic Microbiology, 31(4), 279–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, T. H., & Lee, Y. Y. (2005). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 121/124, 1119–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Galbe, M., Gorwa-Grauslund, M. F., Lidén, G., & Zacchi, G. (2006). Trends Biotechnology, 24(12), 549–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wingren, A., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2003). Biotechnology Progress, 19, 1109–1117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dien, B. S., Cotta, M. A., & Jeffries, T. W. (2003). Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: Current status. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 63(3), 258–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by Masada, LLC, Alabama Center for Renewable Resources Engineering, and Laboratory of Biofuels and Biomaterials, Auburn University, AL, USA. They are grateful to Boise Paper, Jackson, AL, USA, for providing paper mill sludges and technical information and to Danisco Genencor, Palo Alto, CA, USA for providing cellulase enzymes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    Li Kang, Wei Wang & Yoon Y. Lee

Authors
  1. Li Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoon Y. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoon Y. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, L., Wang, W. & Lee, Y.Y. Bioconversion of Kraft Paper Mill Sludges to Ethanol by SSF and SSCF. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161, 53–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8893-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8893-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation