Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

AnSBBR Applied to Organic Matter and Sulfate Removal: Interaction Effect Between Feed Strategy and Cod/Sulfate Ratio

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mechanically stirred anaerobic sequencing batch reactor containing anaerobic biomass immobilized on polyurethane foam cubes, treating low-strength synthetic wastewater (500 mg COD L−1), was operated under different operational conditions to assess the removal of organic matter and sulfate. These conditions were related to fill time, defined by the following feed strategies: batch mode of 10 min, fed-batch mode of 3 h and fed-batch mode of 6 h, and COD/[SO4 2−] ratios of 1.34, 0.67, and 0.34 defined by organic matter concentration of 500 mg COD L−1 and sulfate concentrations of 373, 746, and 1,493 mg SO4 2− L−1 in the influent. Thus, nine assays were performed to investigate the influence of each of these parameters, as well as the interaction effect, on the performance of the system. The reactor operated with agitation of 400 rpm, total volume of 4.0 L, and treated 2.0 L synthetic wastewater in 8-h cycles at 30 ± 1°C. During all assays, the reactor showed operational stability in relation to the monitored variables such as COD, sulfate, sulfide, sulfite, volatile acids, bicarbonate alkalinity, and solids, thus demonstrating the potential to apply this technology to the combined removal of organic matter and sulfate. In general, the results showed that the 3-h fed-batch operation with a COD/[SO4 2−] ratio of 0.34 presented the best conditions for organic matter removal (89%). The best efficiency for sulfate removal (71%) was accomplished during the assay with a COD/[SO4 2−] ratio of 1.34 and a fill time of 6 h. It was also observed that as fill time and sulfate concentration in the influent increased, the ratio between removed sulfate load and removed organic load also increased. However, it should be pointed out that the aim of this study was not to optimize the removal of organic matter and sulfate, but rather to analyze the behavior of the reactor during the different feed strategies and applied COD/[SO4 2−] ratios, and mainly to analyze the interaction effect, an aspect that has not yet been explored in the literature for batch reactors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silva, A. J., Hirasawa, J. S., Varesche, M. B., Foresti, E., & Zaiat, M. (2006). Evaluation of support materials for the immobilization of sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Anaerobe, 12, 93–98. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.12.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lens, P. N. L., Visser, A., Jansen, A. J. H., Hulshoff, P. L. W., & Lettinga, G. (1998). Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 28(1), 41–88. doi:10.1080/10643389891254160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratusznei, S. M., Rodrigues, J. A. D., Camargo, E. F. M., Zaiat, M., & Borzani, W. (2000). Feasibility of a stirred anaerobic sequencing batch reactor containing immobilized biomass for wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 75, 127–132. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00048-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Michelan, R., Zimmer, T. R., Rodrigues, J. A. D., Ratusznei, S. M., Moraes, D., & Zaiat, M., et al. (2009). Effect of impeller type and mechanical agitation on the mass transfer and power consumption aspects of ASBR operation treating synthetic wastewate. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), 1357–1364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratusznei, S. M., Rodrigues, J. A. D., Camargo, E. F. M., Ribeiro, R., & Zaiat, M. (2003). Effects of feed strategy on the stability and efficiency of a stirred anaerobic sequential fed-batch reactor containing immobilized biomass. Bioresource Technology, 90(2), 199–205. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00113-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Souza, J. T., & Foresti, E. (1996). Domestic sewage treatment in the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket – sequencing batch reactor system. Water Science and Technology, 33, 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muthumbi, W., Boon, N., Boterdaele, R., De Vreese, I., Top, E. M., & Verstraete, W. (2001). Microbial sulfate reduction with acetate: Process performance and composition of bacterial communities in the reactor at different salinity levels. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 55, 787–793. doi:10.1007/s002530100623.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (19th ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dillalo, R., & Albertson, O. E. (1961). Volatile acids by direct titration. Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 3, 356–365.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ripley, L. E., Boyle, W. C., & Converse, J. C. (1986). Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestor of high-strength wastes. Journal—Water Pollution Control Federation, 58, 406–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., & Williams, S. T. (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed. Williams & Wilkins.

  12. Rinzema, A., & Lettinga, G. (1988). Anaerobic treatment of sulfate containing waste water. In D. L. Wise (Ed), Biotreatment systems, vol III. Boca Raton, USA: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Flaherty, V., Colohan, S., Mullerrins, D., & Colleran, E. (1999). Effect of sulphate addition on volatile fatty acid and ethanol degradation in an anaerobic hybrid reactor. II: Microbial interactions and toxic effects. Bioresource Technology, 68, 109–120. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00146-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Isa, Z., Grusenmeyer, S., & Verstraete, W. (1986). Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 51(3), 580–587.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP—São Paulo, Brasil) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq—Brasil). The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Baltus C. Bonse for the revision of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Hidráulica and Saneamento, Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo (SHS/EESC/USP), Av. Trabalhador São-Carlense 400, CEP 13.566-590, São Carlos, SP, Brasil

    Gregor F. Friedl, Gustavo Mockaitis, Marcelo Zaiat & Eugênio Foresti

  2. Escola de Engenharia Mauá, Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia (EEM/IMT), Praça Mauá 1, CEP 09.580-900, São Caetano do Sul, SP, Brasil

    José A. D. Rodrigues & Suzana M. Ratusznei

Authors
  1. Gregor F. Friedl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gustavo Mockaitis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José A. D. Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Suzana M. Ratusznei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marcelo Zaiat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eugênio Foresti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. D. Rodrigues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedl, G.F., Mockaitis, G., Rodrigues, J.A.D. et al. AnSBBR Applied to Organic Matter and Sulfate Removal: Interaction Effect Between Feed Strategy and Cod/Sulfate Ratio. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 159, 95–109 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8585-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8585-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation