Abstract
The effect of heating strategy on power consumption and performance of a pilot plant anaerobic digester treating chicken litter, under thermophilic conditions, has been studied. Heating strategy was evaluated using three different spans (0.2 °C, 0.6 °C, and 1.0 °C) for triggering the temperature control system from target temperature (56.7 °C). The hydraulic retention time in the pilot plant digester was in the range of 32 to 37 days, varying the total solids concentration fed from 5% to 6%. The results showed that under the experimental conditions, heating was the most energy-demanding process with 95.5% of the energy used. Increments up to 7.5% and 3.8%, respectively, on mechanical and heating power consumption, were observed as the span, for triggering the temperature control system from target temperature, was increased. Under the experimental conditions studied here, an increment of 30.6% on the global biodigester performance index was observed when a span of 1.0 °C was compared to the one of 0.2 °C.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
El-Mashad, H. M., Zeeman, G., van Loon, W. K. P., Bot, G. P. A., & Lettinga, G. (2004). Bioresource Technology, 95(2), 191–201. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2003.07.013.
Leitao, R. C., van Haandel, A. C., Zeeman, G., & Lettinga, G. (2006). Bioresource Technology, 97(9), 1105–1118. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.007.
Bourque, J. -S., Guiot, S. R., & Tartakovsky, B. (2008). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 100(6), 1115–1121.
Bombardiere, J., Espinosa-Solares, T., Domaschko, M., & Chatfield, M. (2006). in Proceedings Seventh IWA Conference on Small Water and Wastewater Systems, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lübken, M., Wichern, M., Letsiou, I., Kehl, O., Bischof, F., & Horn, H. (2007). Water Science and Technology, 56(10), 19–28. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.729.
Espinosa-Solares, T., Bombardiere, J., Domaschko, M., Chatfield, M., Stafford, D. A., Castillo-Angeles, S., et al. (2006). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 129–132, 959–968.
Shigematsu, T., Tang, Y. Q., Kawaguchi, H., Ninomiya, K., Kijima, J., Kobayashi, T., Morimura, S., & Kida, K. (2003). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96, 547–558. doi:10.1016/S1389-1723(04)70148-6.
APHA/AWWA/WEF (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association.
Hach (2004). Hach water analysis handbook (4th ed.). Colorado, USA: Hach Company.
Himmelblau, D. M. (1997). Principios básicos y cálculos en ingeniería química (6th ed.). México City, México: Prentice Hall.
Rao, M. A., & Rizvi, S. S. H. (1986). Engineering properties of foods. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker.
Huang, F. F. (1994). Ingeniería termodinámica. Fundamentos y aplicaciones (2nd ed.). México City, México: CECSA.
Lomas, J. M., Urbano, C., & Camarero, L. M. (1999). Biomass and Bioenergy, 17(1), 49–58. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00021-5.
Bohn, I., Björnsson, L., & Mattiasson, B. (2007). Process Biochemistry, 42(1), 57–64. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2006.07.013.
Zupančič, G. D., Stražiščar, M., & Roš, M. (2007). Bioresource Technology, 98(14), 2714–2722. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.044.
Kim, J. K., Gui Han, H., Oh, B. R., Chun, Y. N., Eom, C. -Y., & Kim, S. W. (2008). Bioresource Technology, 99(10), 4394–4399. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.031.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support received from West Virginia State University, Gus R. Douglass Institute’s Agricultural and Environmental Research Station; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Technología de México, and the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Departamento de Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Mexico. We would also like to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions: Dr. Mark Chatfield and Scot Shapero.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Espinosa-Solares, T., Valle-Guadarrama, S., Bombardiere, J. et al. Effect of Heating Strategy on Power Consumption and Performance of a Pilot Plant Anaerobic Digester. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 156, 35–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8487-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8487-6