Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Expression of Bacillus anthracis Protective Antigen in E. coli

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The protective antigen (PA) of Bacillus anthracis is a potent immunogen and an important candidate vaccine. In addition, it is used in monitoring systems like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to assess antibodies against PA in immunized subjects. The low level of PA production in B. anthracis and the difficulty of separating it from other bacterial components have made the researchers do different studies with the aim of producing recombinant PA (rPA). In this study, to produce rPA as a recombinant protein vaccine, the partial sequence of protective antigen of B. anthracis, amino acids 175–764, as a potent immunogenic target was inserted in pET21b(+). This is a prokaryotic plasmid that carries an N-terminal T7.tag sequence. The integrity of constructed plasmid was confirmed using restriction enzyme mapping. rPA was expressed after induction with isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside in Escherichia coli BL21. Purification of rPA was done with an affinity system using anti T7.tag antibody. Electrophoresis and Western blotting confirmed the specificity of the expressed protein. BALB/c mice were immunized with obtained PA protein and evaluation of specific immunoglobulin G antibodies against PA in sera using Western blotting method and showed that rPA is immunogenic. The challenge of immunized mice with virulent strain of B. anthracis showed that rPA is functional to protect against pathogenic strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weiss, M. M., Weiss, P. D., & Weiss, J. B. (2007). American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1945–1951. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.102749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petosa, C., et al. (1997). Nature, 385, 833–838. doi:10.1038/385833a0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vahedi, F., et al. (2005). Iranian Journal of Immunology, 3, 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brossier, F., Guidi-Rontani, C., & Mock, M. (1998). Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Société de Biologie et de ses Filiales, 192, 437–444.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mourez, M., et al. (2003). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 13803–13808. doi:10.1073/pnas.2436299100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baillie, L. W. (2006). Journal of Applied Microbiology, 101, 594–606. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03112.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Splino, M., et al. (2005). Annals of Saudi Medicine, 25, 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grunow, R., et al. (2007). Vaccine, 25, 3679–3683. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.056.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rhie, G. E., et al. (2005). FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, 45, 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.femsim.2005.05.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baillie, L. W., Johnson, M., & Manchee, R. J. (1994). Letters in Applied Microbiology, 19, 225–227. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00949.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chauhan, V., et al. (2001). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 283, 308–315. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.4777.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, P., Sahai, V., & Bhatnagar, R. (2001). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 285, 1025–1033. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.5282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gwinn, W., et al. (2006). Protein Expression and Purification, 45, 30–36. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2005.04.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hepler, R. W., et al. (2006). Vaccine, 24, 1501–1514. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.10.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Nature, 227, 680–685. doi:10.1038/227680a0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradford, M. (1976). Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miroux, B., & Walker, J. E. (1996). Journal of Molecular Biology, 260, 289–298. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Novak, J. M., et al. (1992). The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 267, 17186–17193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman, T. C., et al. (1995). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 316, 5–13. doi:10.1006/abbi.1995.1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vodkin, M. H., & Leppla, S. H. (1983). Cell, 34, 693–697. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90402-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma, M., et al. (1996). Protein Expression and Purification, 7, 33–38. doi:10.1006/prep.1996.0005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahuja, N., Kumar, P., & Bhatnagar, R. (2001). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 286, 6–11. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.5337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta, P., Waheed, S. M., & Bhatnagar, R. (1999). Protein Expression and Purification, 16, 369–376. doi:10.1006/prep.1999.1066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Quinn, C. P., et al. (1988). The Biochemical Journal, 252, 753–758.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hambleton, P., & Turnbull, P. C. (1990). Advances in Biotechnological Processes, 13, 105–122.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Vahedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vahedi, F., Sankian, M. & Mahmoudi, M. Functional Expression of Bacillus anthracis Protective Antigen in E. coli . Appl Biochem Biotechnol 157, 554–561 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8309-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8309-x

Keywords

Navigation