Abstract
This study uses an overall evaluation criterion for improving the immobilized bead reusability and extracellular enzyme production by immobilized cells by assigning relative weightage to bead reusability, enzyme production, and cell leakage. Initially, alkaline protease production by alginate-immobilized Bacillus circulans (MTCC 6811) was analyzed using L18 orthogonal array (OA). The resultant optimized parameters were further fine-tuned with L9 OA experimentation. At L18-OA analysis, inoculum level and CaCl2 had least influence at individual level. At the interactive level, incubation time revealed maximum and minimum interaction with sodium alginate and glucose concentration, respectively. L9 experimentation indicated that glucose concentration contributed the major influence on protease production followed by matrix material and incubation time at the individual level, and at the interactive level, matrix concentration played a vital role by interacting with incubation time, inoculum, and CaCl2 concentration. All selected input parameters showed significance either at individual level or interactive in both OAs. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed bacterial morphology variation with variation of matrix concentration. Overall, glucose concentration depicted a major influence at the individual level for the enzyme production. Significant improvement, approximately 147%, in enzyme yield was observed. Economic enzyme production by immobilized B. circulans is regulated by interactive influence of fermentation parameters, which influence the immobilized bead stability, reusability, and enzyme yield.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zamost, B. L., Nielsen, H., & Starnes, R. (1991). Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 8, 71–82.
Aasling, D., Gormsen, E., & Malmos, H. (1991). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 50, 321–330.
Wiseman, A. (1993). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 53, 3–13.
Turk, B. (2006). Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 5, 785–799.
Kumar, C. G., & Takagi, H. (1999). Biotechnology Advances, 17, 561–594.
Gupta, R., Beg, Q. K., & Lorenz, P. (2002). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 59, 15–32.
Prakasham, R. S., Subba Rao, Ch., Sreenivas Rao, R., & Sarma, P. N. (2005). Biotechnology Progress, 21, 1380–1388.
Prakasham, R. S., Subba Rao, Ch., & Sarma, P. N. (2006). Bioresource Technology, 97, 1449–1454.
Subba Rao, Ch., Sathish, T., Mahalaxmi, M., Suvarna Laxmi, G., Sreenivas Rao, R., & Prakasham, R. S. (2007). Journal of Applied Microbiology doi:10.1111/j.1365–2672.2007.03605.x (in press).
Prakasham, R. S., Kuriakose, B., & Ramakrishna, S. V. (1999). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 82, 127–134.
Prakasham, R. S., Subba Rao, Ch., Sreenivas Rao, R., & Sarma, P. N. (2005). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 120, 133–144.
Srinivasulu, B., Prakasham, R. S., Annapurna, J., Srinivas, S., Ellaiah, P., & Ramakrishna, S. V. (2002). Process Biochemistry, 38, 593–598.
Sreenivas Rao, R., Prakasham, R. S., Krishna Prasad, K., Rajesham, S., Sarma, P. N., & Venkateswar Rao, L. (2004). Process Biochemistry, 39, 951–956.
Zhang, X., Bury, S., DiBiasio, D., & Miller, J. E. (1989). Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 4, 239–246.
Galazzo, J. L., & Bailey, J. E. (1990). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 36, 417–426.
Ramkrishna, S. V., & Prakasham, R. S. (1999). Current Science, 77, 87–100.
Himabindu, M., Ravichandra, P., Vishalakshi, K., & Annapurna, J. (2006). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 134, 143–154.
Prakasham, R. S., Subba Rao, Ch., Sreenivas Rao, R. S., Lakshmi, G. S., & Sarma, P. N. (2007a). Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102, 1382–1391.
Prakasham, R. S., Subba Rao, Ch., Sreenivas Rao, R., & Sarma, P. N. (2007b). Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102, 204–211.
Ravichandra, P., Subhakar, Ch., & Annapurna, J. (2007). Biochemical Engineering Journal, 34, 185–192.
Bashan, Y. (1986). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 51, 1089–1098.
Hagihara, B., Matsubara, H., Nakai, M., & Okunuki, K. (1958). Journal of Biochemistry, 45, 185–194.
Roy, R. K. (1990). A primer on the Taguchi method. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
Roy, R. K. (2001). Taguchi approach: 16 steps to product and process improvement. New York: Wiley.
Beshay, U. (2003). African Journal of Biotechnology, 2, 60–65.
Nava, S., Roisin, C., & Barbotin, J.-N. (1996). In: R. H. Wijffels, R. M. Buitelaar, C. Bucke, J. Tramper (Eds.). Progress in Biotechnology, 11, 39–46.
Sreenivas Rao, R., Pavana Jyothi, Ch., Prakasham, R. S., Sarma, P. N., & Venkateswar Rao, L. (2006). Bioresource Technology, 97, 1974–1978.
Fumi, M. D., Silva, A., Battistotti, G., & Golagrande, O. (1992). Biotechnology Letters, 14, 605–608.
Elibol, M., & Moreira, A. R. (2003). Process Biochemistry, 38, 1445–1450.
Prakasham, R. S., Sreenivas Rao, R., Subba Rao, Ch., & Sarma, P. N. (2005). Indian Journal Biotechnology, 4, 353–357.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to Dr. R. K. Roy, president, Nutek, USA, for providing Qualitek-4 software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Subba Rao, C., Madhavendra, S.S., Sreenivas Rao, R. et al. Studies on Improving the Immobilized Bead Reusability and Alkaline Protease Production by Isolated Immobilized Bacillus circulans (MTCC 6811) Using Overall Evaluation Criteria. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 150, 65–83 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8147-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8147-x