Abstract
As enzyme chemistry plays an increasingly important role in the chemical industry, cost analysis of these enzymes becomes a necessity. In this paper, we examine the aspects that affect the cost of enzymes based upon enzyme activity. The basis for this study stems from a previously developed objective function that quantifies the tradeoffs in enzyme purification via the foam fractionation process (Cherry et al., Braz J Chem Eng 17:233–238, 2000). A generalized cost function is developed from our results that could be used to aid in both industrial and lab scale chemical processing. The generalized cost function shows several nonobvious results that could lead to significant savings. Additionally, the parameters involved in the operation and scaling up of enzyme processing could be optimized to minimize costs. We show that there are typically three regimes in the enzyme cost analysis function: the low activity prelinear region, the moderate activity linear region, and high activity power-law region. The overall form of the cost analysis function appears to robustly fit the power law form.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cherry, J., Ko, S., Grainger, R., Prokop, A., & Tanner, R. (2000). Developing an objective function to characterize the tradeoffs in salting out and the foam and droplet fractionation processes. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 17, 233–238.
Zhang, Q., Lo, C.-M. & Ju, L.-K. (2007). Factors affecting foaming behavior in Cellulase fermentation by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30. Bioresource Technology, 98(4), 753–760.
Lo, C.-M., Zhang, Q., Lee, P., & Ju, L-K. (2005). Cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei using Sawdust Hydrolysate. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 121–124, 561–573.
Graff, G., “Pharma Market Spur Increased Enzyme Demand” 3/1/2007 http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA6419082.html.
Poulsen, P. (1987). Trends in industrial applications of enzymes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Enzyme Engineering, 501, 413–419.
Nilesh; A., Kamat, M., & Arvind, L. (2004). Expanded bed affinity purification of bacterial α-amylase and Cellulase on composite substrate analogue-Cellulose matrices. Process Biochemistry, 39, 565–570.
Zhang, Q., Lo, C.-M., & Ju, L.-K. (2006). Affinity foam fractionation of Trichoderma Cellulase. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 129–132, 1051–1065.
Carolina Biochemical Corporation. http://www.carolina.com. (catalog information on enzymes). 4/1/07.
Fisher Scientific. http://new.fishersci.com. (catalog information on enzymes). 4/1/07.
Sigma-Aldrich Corporation. http://wwwsigmaaldrich.com. (catalog information on enzymes). 4/1/07.
Worthington Biochemical Corporation. http://www.worthington-biochem.com. (catalog information on enzymes). 4/1/07.
Elastin Products Company, Inc. http://www.elastin.com (catalogue information on enzymes) 4/1/07.
“Enzymatic Production of Invert Sugar”, Ensymm Consulting for Biotechnology (2007). http://www.ensymm.com/pdf/ensymmProjectstudyreportInversugarproduction.pdf.
Cacciuttolo, M., & Arunakumari, A., “ Scale-Up Considerations for Biotechnology-Derived Products” http://biomedical.rutgers.edu/doc/Scale%20Up%20of%20Biotechnology%20Products.pdf.
Blanch, H., & Clark, D. (1997). Biochemical Engineering. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, pp. 678–682.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stowers, C.C., Ferguson, E.M. & Tanner, R.D. Development of Activity-based Cost Functions for Cellulase, Invertase, and Other Enzymes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 147, 107–117 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8087-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8087-x