Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Virtual reality laboratories: a review of experiences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory experiences are critical to the learning process across all domains of engineering, due to the fact that information technology has changed the educational laboratory landscape. Three general laboratory types are found in engineering education; namely, hands-on, virtual and remote; each of them with its own advantages and drawbacks. In this paper, various types of university laboratories around the world are described to present the updated state-of-the-art. Additionally, a discussion regarding the educational effectiveness of each laboratory format is discussed. Finally, a case study of the development and implementation of virtual reality laboratories and remote labs at Tecnologico de Monterrey is presented. Early results have demonstrated that the virtual labs are a viable option to complement and/or replace hands-on labs, mainly because of their low investment, low maintenance costs and ease of replication to meet user demand and, above all, because of their great impact on the new teaching paradigms, where it is necessary to encourage active learning and the development of skills based on challenges. In addition to reviewing the most characteristic learning outcomes of each type of laboratory, different elements that influence the success of teaching and learning processes, such as presence, belief, and collaboration, etc., are reviewed. We hope that this research will serve as a guide for designs of individual, blended or hybrid types of laboratories used for experimental teaching in engineering education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Senthamarai, S.: Interactive teaching strategies. J. Appl. Adv. Res. 3, 36–38 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Morales-Menendez, R.: Technological innovations and practices in engineering education: a review. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2019) (in Press)

  3. Sheridan, T.B.: Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1(1), 120–126 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma, J., Nickerson, J.V.: Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: a comparative literature review. ACM Comput. Surv. 38(3), 1–24 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Research Council: America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. The National Academies Press, Washington (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zapata, L., Larrondo, M.: Models of collaborative remote laboratories and integration with learning environments. Int. J. Online Eng. 12(9), 14–21 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chicago State University.: What is the Chemistry Van. http://tyff.tripod.com/Outreach/chemvan.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2018

  8. Viegas, C., Pavani, A., Lima, N., Marques, A., Pozzo, I., Dobboletta, E., Atencia, V., Barreto, D., Calliari, F., Fidalgo, A., Lima, D., Temporão, G., Alves, G.: Impact of a remote lab on teaching practices and student learning. Comput. Educ. 126(July), 201–216 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cotfas, P.A., Cotfas, D.T., Gerigan, C.: Simulated, hands-on and remote laboratories for studying the solar cells. In: Joint International Conference-ACEMP 2015: Aegean Conf on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics, OPTIM 2015: Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and 2015: International Symposium on Advanced Electromechanical Moti, pp. 206–211 (2016)

  10. Feisel, L., Rosa, A.: The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. J. Eng. Educ. 94(1), 121–130 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elawady, Y., Tolba, A.: Educational objectives of different laboratory types: a comparative study. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 6(2), 8 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibbins, L., Perkin, G.: Laboratories for the 21st Century in STEM Higher Education. Centre for Eng and Design Education, p. 102 (2013)

  13. University of Liverpool.: Central Teaching Hub. https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/central-teaching-hub/. Accessed 29 Oct 2018

  14. Nottingham Trent University.: The Rosalind Franklin Building. https://www.ntu.ac.uk/study-and-courses/courses/our-facilities/the-rosalind-franklin-building. Accessed 29 Oct 2018

  15. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje.: University. http://www.ukim.edu.mk/en_content.php?meni=10&glavno=10. Accessed 29 Oct 2018

  16. Ackovska, N., Kirandziska, V.: The importance of hands-on experiences in robotics courses. In: 17th IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies—IEEE EuroCon 2017 Conference Proceedings, pp. 56–61 (2017)

  17. Cardiff University.: Power electronic lab. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/research-equipment/facilities/view/power-electronic-lab. Accessed 29 Oct 2018

  18. University of Bradford.: Faculty of Life Sciences. https://www.bradford.ac.uk/life-sciences/. Accessed 30 Oct 2018

  19. MIT ICampus.: iLabs. http://icampus.mit.edu/projects/ilabs/. Accessed 27 Oct 2018

  20. MIT.: About iLabs (2011). https://wikis.mit.edu/confluence/display/ILAB2/about+iLabs. Accessed 27 Oct 2018

  21. Corter, J.E., Esche, S.K., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., Nickerson, J.V.: Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories. Comput. Educ. 57(3), 2054–2067 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, S.R., Blanchard, R., Mohammed, A., Bliss, M., Pancholi, R., Clowes, M.: The development of a remote laboratory for distance learning at Loughborough University. In: Edulearn13: 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, pp. 4342–4349 (2013)

  23. Levesley, M.C., Culmer, P., Page, K., Gallagher, J., Weightman, A.P.H., Bhakta, B.B., Tennant, A., Cripton, P.: development and evaluation of personalised remote experiments in an engineering degree. In: WEBIST 2007: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Vol SeBeG/eL: Society, E-Business And E-Government, E-Learning, pp. 330–337 (2007)

  24. Hanson, B., Stamp, A., Read, E.: The Use of Real Labs Operated at a Distance (Reload) as a Teaching Aid. The Higher Education Academy, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. NetLab, “What is NetLab?,” About NetLab. http://netlab.unisa.edu.au/about/whatIsNetLab.xhtml. Accessed 28 Oct 2018

  26. Nafalski, A., Nedić, Z., Machotka, J.: Remote engineering laboratories for collaborative experiments. In: 2nd World Conference on Technology and Eng Education, pp. 101–103 (2011)

  27. Gustavsson, I., Zackrisson, J., Olsson, T.: Traditional lab sessions in a remote laboratory for circuit analysis. In: Proceedings of the 15th EAEEIE Annual Conference on Innovation in Education for Electrical and Information Engineering (2014)

  28. OpenLabs Electronics Laboratory.: Welcome. http://openlabs.bth.se/electronics/index.php/en?page=StartPage#. Accessed 30 Oct 2018

  29. University of Siena.: Automatic Control Telelab. http://act.dii.unisi.it/home.php. Accessed 31 Oct 2018

  30. Gomes, L., Bogosyan, S.: Current trends in remote laboratories. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56(12), 4744–4756 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V.M., Jovanović, K.: Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: a review. Comput. Educ. 95, 309–327 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Center for Educational Computing Initiatives.: About TEALsim. http://web.mit.edu/viz/soft/visualizations/tealsim/index.html. Accessed 27 Oct 2018

  33. Gorghiu, G., Bîzoi, M., Gorghiu, L.M., Suduc, A.M.: Web tools and instruments created in the VccSSe European project with the view to support science teachers’ experimental activities. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 15, 1231–1235 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ChemCollective.: Introduction, About. http://chemcollective.org/about_us/introduction. Accessed 27 Oct 2018

  35. Lynch, T., Ghergulescu, I.: Review of virtual labs as the emerging technologies for teaching STEM subjects. In: 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, pp. 6082–6091 (2017)

  36. Babich, A., Mavrommatis, K.: Virtual laboratory concept for engineering education. In: International Conference on Engineering Education and Research “Progress Through Partnership”, pp. 1043–1050 (2004)

  37. Fernández-Avilés, D., Dotor, D., Contreras, D., Salazar, J.C.: Virtual labs: a new tool in the education: Experience of Technical University of Madrid. In: Proceedings of 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2016, pp. 271–272 (2016)

  38. University of Bristol.: The eBiolabs story. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/ebiolabs/more/. Accessed 31 Oct 2018

  39. Brinson, J.R.: Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: a review of the empirical research. Comput. Educ. 87, 218–237 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. National Research Council: A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academy Press, Washington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schwab, J.J., Brandwein, P.: The Teaching of Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Koballa, T., Kemp, A., Evans, R.: The spectrum of scientific literacy. Sci. Teach. 64(7), 27–31 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Michaels, S., Shouse, A.W.: Ready, Set, Science!. National Academies Press, Washington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cooper, M., Donnelly, A., Ferreira, J.M.: Remote controlled experiments for teaching over the Internet: a comparison of approaches developed in the PEARL project. In: Proceedings of the ASCILITE Conference on Auckland New Zealand, p. M2D.1-M2D.9 (2002)

  45. Patrick, J.: Training: Research and Practice. Academic Press, San Diego (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vuorela, M., Nummenmaa, L.: How undergraduate students meet a new learning environment? Comput. Hum. Behav. 20(6), 763–777 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Biocca, F.: Inserting the presence of mind into a philosophy of presence: a response To Sheridan and Mantovani and Riva. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10(5), 546–556 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pereira, C.E., Paladini, S., Schaf, F.M.: Control and automation engineering education: combining physical, remote and virtual labs. In: 9th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, pp. 1–10 (2012)

  49. Macias, M., Vallejo, A., Ramirez, D.: Remote and real time laboratories network for engineering education. In: 11th LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, pp. 1–10 (2013)

  50. Macías, M.E., Méndez, I.: TeleLab—Remote Automations Lab in Real Time. In: 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference SIB-15, pp. 15–20 (2008)

  51. Salazar, E.A., Macías, M.E.: Virtual 3D controllable machine models for implementation of automations laboratories. In: 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1–5 (2009)

  52. Macías, M.E., Guridi, E.D.: Emulation of real processes to improve training in automation. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 00(0), 1–7 (2008)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the technical and the financial support of Writing Lab, TecLabs, Tecnologico de Monterrey, México in the production of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, NL, Mexico

    Marcela Hernández-de-Menéndez, Antonio Vallejo Guevara & Ruben Morales-Menendez

Authors
  1. Marcela Hernández-de-Menéndez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Vallejo Guevara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruben Morales-Menendez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Morales-Menendez.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A. & Morales-Menendez, R. Virtual reality laboratories: a review of experiences. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13, 947–966 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00558-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00558-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation