Enriching design with X through tailored additive manufacturing knowledge: a methodological proposal

  • Laverne Floriane
  • Segonds Frédéric
  • D’Antonio Gianluca
  • Le Coq Marc
Original Paper

Abstract

In a few years, Additive Manufacturing (AM) has become a promising technology and opened up new prospects for the product development. Nevertheless, design methods remain predominantly based on conventional manufacturing processes and AM capabilities need to be better mastered and integrated in the design team. This article questions how a new technology (i.e. AM) can enable product innovation. Thus to support designers in preliminary design, a methodology is introduced. The specificity of this methodology is the use of a tailored AM knowledge, i.e. a knowledge delivered to the right user at the right time and in the right format, in order to be useful and usable during the creative stages of the design process.

Keywords

Design with X Design for X Additive Manufacturing DWAM Knowledge Preliminary design 

References

  1. 1.
    Kruth, J.P.: Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 40, 603–614 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM International: Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (Withdrawn 2015)—ASTM F2792-12a. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaruzelski, B., Dehoff, K.: The global innovation 1000: how the top innovators keep winning. Strategy + Business Magazine, iss. 61, pp. 1–14, Winter (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nadeau, J.-P., Fischer, X.: Interactive design: then and now. In: Nadeau, J.-P., Fischer, X. (eds.) Research in interactive design: virtual, interactive and integrated product design and manufacturing for industrial innovation, vol. 3. Springer, Paris (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tichkiewitch, S., Véron, M.: Integration of manufacturing processes in design. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 47, 99–102 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzgerald, D.P., Herrmann, J.W., Schmidt, L.C.: A conceptual design tool for resolving conflicts between product functionality and environmental impact. ASME J. Mech. Design 132, 11 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, C., Kimura, F.: Design methodologies: industrial and educational applications. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 58, 543–565 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibson, I., Rosen, D.R., Stucker, B.: Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 2nd edn. Springer US, New York (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laverne, F., Segonds, F., Anwer, N., Le Coq, M.: Assembly-based methods to support product innovation in design for additive manufacturing: an exploratory case study. ASME J. Mech. Design 137, 8 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Von Stamm, B.: Managing Innovation, Design and Creativity. Wiley, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Segonds, F., Cohen, G., Véron, P., Peyceré, J.: PLM and early stages collaboration in interactive design, a case study in the glass industry. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 10(2), 10 (2014). doi: 10.1007/s12008-014-0217-4
  12. 12.
    Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10, 123–167 (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howard, T.J., Culley, S.J., Dekoninck, E.: Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Stud. 29, 160–180 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B.: Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 9–30 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Langeveld, L.: Design with X is new in product design education. In: International design conference—DESIGN 2006. Dubrovnik, Croatia (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Popadiuk, S., Choo, C.W.: Innovation and knowledge creation: how are these concepts related? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 26, 302–312 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hatchuel, A., Weil, B.: A new approach of innovative Design: anintroduction to CK theory. In: International conference on engineering design—ICED 2003, Stockholm, (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christiaans, H., Venselaar, K.: Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: modelling the expert. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. 15, 217–236 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grundstein, M.: From capitalizing on company knowledge to knowledge management. Knowl. Manag. Classic Contemp. Works 12, 261–287 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garetti, M., Terzi, S., Bertacci, N., Brianza, M.: Organisational change and knowledge management in PLM implementation. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 1, 43–51 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design—A Systematic Approach, 3rd edn. Springer, London (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pei, E., Campbell, I., Evans, M.: A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers. Design J. 14, 64–91 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saunders, M.N., Seepersad, C.C., Hölttä-Otto, K.: The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products. ASME J. Mech. Design 133, 9 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laverne Floriane
    • 1
  • Segonds Frédéric
    • 1
  • D’Antonio Gianluca
    • 2
  • Le Coq Marc
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Conception de Produits et Innovation, Arts et Métiers ParisTechParisFrance
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale e della ProduzionePolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations