Where Are We Now?
The cross-sectional study by Anderson and colleagues examined radiographic acetabular morphology in asymptomatic senior athletes. The authors evaluated anterior and posterior femoral head coverage in “normal” hips using the anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI) [10].
Siebenrock and colleagues [10] introduced the concept of AWI and PWI as a measurement on plain films to quantify the contribution of anterior and posterior wall coverage in acetabular pathomorphology of symptomatic patients. Numerous radiographic angles, indices, and ratios—including the lateral center-edge angle, ACM angle, sharp angle, acetabular and extrusion indices, cranio-caudal acetabular coverage, AP acetabular coverage, and crossover and posterior wall sign—also describe the acetabular anatomic morphology projected on the AP pelvic radiograph [11]. However, none of these parameters provide quantification of AP acetabular coverage, which is essential to distinguish between normal and abnormal hips. AP acetabular coverage quantification also can serve as a guide in clinical decision-making.
Reliable measurements are indispensable to monitor intraoperative correction in the treatment of acetabular overcoverage (such as pincer type femoroacetabular impingement [FAI]) and undercoverage (developmental dysplasia of the hip). Although at the end of the spectrum all osteoarthritis may appear similar, the mechanics behind these two distinct acetabular morphologies are entirely different. Acetabular undercoverage may cause increased joint contact (static overload), while overcoverage may lead to increased contact between the acetabulum and the femoral head-neck junction (dynamic FAI conflict) [6, 12, 13].
Where Do We Need To Go?
A challenge in the treatment of acetabular overcoverage is to ascertain the limits of resection of the acetabular rim to assure resolution of symptoms and at the same time avoid iatrogenic acetabular dysplasia. On the contrary, for the treatment of acetabular undercoverage, the degree of correction needs to be guided by a referenced normal value, and an accurate method to measure it.
Standard, reproducible, and cost-effective approaches must be developed to elucidate acetabular coverage and its clinical implications. Although acetabular morphology can be quantified accurately with the aid of CT scans or specialized computer software [1, 2, 5, 8, 9], an affordable and intraoperative reproducible method is a valuable resource. More-recently introduced radiographic parameters like AWI and PWI may help overcome the limitations of current parameters. The lateral center-edge angle [14], which only assesses the amount of lateral coverage of the femoral head, or the crossover sign, which only assesses one portion of the rim relative to another, may be complemented with the assessment of the acetabular-wall coverage both anteriorly and posteriorly (AWI and PWI).
Anderson and colleagues establish AWI and PWI normal ranges for asymptomatic patients with a mean age of 67 years (range 50–91 years). However, we need further research to establish normal ranges in asymptomatic younger cohorts. Developing these normal reference range values is of real importance for guiding surgical corrections. In addition to normal reference values, we need reference-range values both for acetabular overcoverage and undercoverage. However, abnormal acetabular morphology is common among asymptomatic subjects [3, 4, 7, 8], so we will depend on future studies to compare differences in acetabular morphology between asymptomatic and symptomatic hips. Only after ascertaining normal ranges, normal variants, and pathologic variations, would both the AWI and PWI be incorporated as a diagnosis and intraoperative aid tool. The utility of these parameters as an intraoperative reference guide, to assess the extent of correction in patients undergoing surgery, should also be tested.
How Do We Get There?
Further research is needed to integrate and correlate different acetabular morphology measurements, providing an enhanced representation and understanding of the underlying normal anatomy to guide our patient treatments. Future studies should assess acetabular anterior and posterior wall coverage by comparing radiographic methods with other complex but accurate imaging techniques such as CT scans or specialized computer software. This type of study could potentially validate the use of AWI and PWI measurements.
Likewise, a better understanding of how these indices behave in morphologic variance (acetabular undercoverage and overcoverage) in both symptomatic and asymptomatic hips are mandatory. Future studies should evaluate both the AWI and PWI in larger cohorts in the previously mentioned conditions to better establish the role of these measurements in the diagnosis and treatment of patients.
References
Cheng H, Liu L, Yu W, Zhang H, Luo D, Zheng G. Comparison of 2.5D and 3D quantification of femoral head coverage in normal control subjects and patients with hip dysplasia. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143498.
Dandachli W, Najefi A, Iranpour F, Lenihan J, Hart A, Cobb J. Quantifying the contribution of pincer deformity to femoro-acetabular impingement using 3D computerised tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:1295–300.
Diesel C V., Ribeiro TA, Coussirat C, Scheidt RB, Macedo CAS, Galia CR. Coxa profunda in the diagnosis of pincertype femoroacetabular impingement and its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:478–483.
Frank JM, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Slikker W, Bush-Joseph CA, Salata MJ, Nho SJ. Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:1199–1204.
Fujii M, Nakamura T, Hara T, Nakashima Y, Iwamoto Y. Does radiographic coxa profunda indicate increased acetabular coverage or depth in hip dysplasia? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:2056–2066.
Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.
Kapron AL, Peters CL, Aoki SK, Beckmann JT, Erickson JA, Anderson MB, Pelt CE. The prevalence of radiographic findings of structural hip deformities in female collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1324–1330.
Larson CM, Moreau-Gaudry A, Kelly BT, Thomas Byrd JW, Tonetti J, Lavallee S, Chabanas L, Barrier G, Bedi A. Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1247–1254.
Mascarenhas V V., Rego P, Dantas P, Morais F, McWilliams J, Collado D, Marques H, Gaspar A, Soldado F, Consciência JG. Imaging prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in symptomatic patients, athletes, and asymptomatic individuals: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:73–95.
Siebenrock KA, Kistler L, Schwab JM, Büchler L, Tannast M. The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3355–3360.
Tannast M, Fritsch S, Zheng G, Siebenrock KA, Steppacher SD. Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1255–1266.
Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:273–80.
Tannast M, Hanke MS, Zheng G, Steppacher SD, Siebenrock KA. What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1234–1246.
Wiberg G. The anatomy and roentgenographic appearance of a normal hip joint. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83:7–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This CORR Insights® is a commentary on the article “Acetabular Wall Indices Help to Distinguish Acetabular Coverage in Asymptomatic Adults With Varying Morphologies” by Anderson and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5055-1.
The author certifies that he, or a member of his immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR ® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.
This CORR Insights® comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5055-1.
About this article
Cite this article
Piuzzi, N.S. CORR Insights®: Acetabular Wall Indices Help to Distinguish Acetabular Coverage in Asymptomatic Adults with Varying Morphologies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475, 1034–1036 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5089-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5089-4