Skip to main content
Log in

Low Incidence of Groin Pain and Early Failure with Large Metal Articulation Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of The Hip Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Large-diameter metal-on-metal articulations reportedly improve stability and wear in THAs. However, some reports suggest some patients have unexplained hip and early failures with these implants. Thus, the potential benefits may be offset by these concerns. However, the incidence of these problems is not clearly established.

Questions/purposes

We therefore assessed hip pain, function, osteolysis, and complications in patients with large-diameter metal-on-metal THA.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 611 patients who had 681 large-diameter metal-on-metal THAs with the same cup and head design. The average age at operation was 62 years, 53% of the THAs were in men, and the average body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 92% of the THAs. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 37 months; range, 24–60 months).

Results

Nine of the 611 patients (1.5%) experienced moderate or severe pain in the hip region that we considered to be coming from an extraarticular source in each case. Harris hip scores for pain averaged 42 points. Total Harris hip scores averaged 93 points. Cup abduction averaged 42°, and cup anteversion averaged 26°. There were no infections. Three cups (0.4%) were considered radiographically loose. All were secondary to inadequate seating of the shell.

Conclusion

Our observations suggest with this implant the concerns of higher incidences of groin pain, early failures, and adverse tissue reactions were not confirmed. Early successes or failures with large-diameter metal-on-metal articulations may be implant specific.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–D

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Affatato S, Leardini W, Jedenmalm A, Ruggeri O, Toni A. Larger diameter bearings reduce wear in metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;456:153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes CL, DeBoer D, Corpe RS, Nambu S, Carroll M, Timmerman I. Wear performance of larger-diameter differential-hardness hip bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartelt RB, Yuan BJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. The prevalence of groin pain after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2346–2356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berry DJ, Bozic KJ. Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:2–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berton C, Girard J, Krantz N, Migaud H. The Durum large diameter head acetabular component: early results with a large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:202–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among Medicare patients with different bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2357–2362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bozic KJ, Pui CM, Ludeman MJ, Vail TP, Silverstein MD. Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2301–2312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brodner W, Grübl A, Jankovsky R, Meisinger V, Lehr S, Gottsauner-Wolf F. Cup inclination and serum concentration of cobalt and chromium after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:66–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2313–2320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S, Takamura K, De Smet K, Amstutz HC. Histological features of pseudomotor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2321–2327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cawley J, Metcalf JE, Jones AH, Band TJ, Skupien DS. A tribological study of cobalt chromium molybdenum alloys used in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Wear. 2003;255:999–1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke MT, Lee PT, Arora LA, Villar RN. Levels of metal ions after small- and large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:913–917.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuckler JM. The rationale for metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:132–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuckler JM, Moore KD, Lombardi AV Jr, McPherson E, Emerson R. Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(8 Suppl 3):41–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dahlstrand H, Stark A, Anissian L, Hailer NP. Elevated serum concentrations of cobalt, chromium, nickel, and manganese after metal-on-metal alloarthroplasty of the hip: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:837–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Renal clearance of cobalt in relation to the use of metal-on-metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:840–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, Murray DW, Campbell PA, De Smet K. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1291–1297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Delaunay CP. Metal-on-metal bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delaunay CP, Bonnomet F, Clavert P, Laffargue P, Migaud H. THA using metal-on-metal articulation in active patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:340–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:20–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Donell ST, Darrah C, Nolan JF, Wimhurst J, Toms A, Barker TH, Case CP, Tucker JK; Norwich Metal-on-Metal Study Group. Early failure of the Ultima metal-on-metal total hip replacement in the presence of normal plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1501–1508.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dowson D, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac GH. A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:118–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT. Metal-on-metal total hip replacement: what does the literature say? J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:174–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Engh CA Jr, Ho H, Engh CA. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:406–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Engh CA Jr, MacDonald SJ, Sritulanondha S, Thompson A, Naudie D, Engh CA. Metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:101–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Epstein NJ, Woolson ST, Giori NJ. Acetabular component positioning using the transverse acetabular ligament: can you find it and does it help? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;469:412–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher J, Jin Z, Tipper J, Stone M, Ingham E. Tribology of alternative bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:25–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:318–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grubl A, Marker M, Brodner W, Giurea A, Heinze G, Meisinger V, Zehetgruber H, Kotz R. Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:841–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hallab N, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83;2001:428–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hart AJ, Skinner JA, Winship P, Faria N, Kulinskaya E, Webster D, Muirhead-Allwood S, Aldam CH, Anwar H, Powell JJ. Circulating levels of cobalt and chromium from metal-on-metal hip replacement are associated with CD8+ T-cell lymphopenia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:835–842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA. What’s new in total hip arthroplasty? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2522–2534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Illgen RL, Heiner JP, Squire MW, Conrad DN. Large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using the Durum acetabular component at minimum 1-year interval. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:26–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Campbell PA, Hallab NJ, Urban RM, Amstutz HC. Can metal levels be used to monitor metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties? J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kamali A, Hussain A, Li C, Pamu J, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Daniel J, McMinn DJ. Tribological performance of various CoCr microstructures in metal-on-metal bearings: the development of a more physiological protocol in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:717–725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim RH, Dennis DA, Carothers JT. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:44–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T. Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: five to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1183–1191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Venittoli PA. The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:326–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Leslie IJ, Williams S, Isaac G, Ingham E, Fisher J. High cup angle and microseparation increase the wear of hip surface replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2259–2265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. MacDonald SJ, Brodner W, Jacobs JJ. A consensus paper on metal ions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:12–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Maezawa K, Nozawa M, Matsuda K, Sugimoto M, Shitoto K, Kurosawa H. Serum chromium levels before and after revision surgery for loosened metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:549–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Malviya A, Ramaskandhan J, Holland JP, Lingard EA. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1675–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Moen TC, Ghate R, Salaz N, Ghodasra J, Stulberg SD. A monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup has no osteolysis on CT at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:382–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nasser AB, Beaulé PE, O’Neill M, Kim PR, Fazekas A. Incidence of groin pain after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Neumann DR, Thaler C, Hitzl W, Huber M, Hofstadter T, Dorn U. Long-term results of a contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:700–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yang JM, Ahn G, Choi YL. Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1515–1521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Peters CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, Erickson JA. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:140–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Schmalzried TP. The optimal metal-metal arthroplasty is still a total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:77–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Silva M, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP. Metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith TM, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Emerson RH Jr, Mallory TH. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:137–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stuchin SA. Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:52–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tower SS. Arthroprosthetic cobaltism: neurological and cardiac manifestations in two patients with metal-on-metal arthroplasty: a case report. J. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2847–2851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tuke MA, Scott G, Roques A, Hi XQ, Taylor A. Design considerations and life prediction of metal-on-metal bearings: the effect of clearance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):134–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Vendittoli PA, Amzica T, Roy AG, Lusignan D, Girard J, Lavigne M. Metal ion release with large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:282–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Williams S, Leslie I, Isaac G, Jin Z, Ingham E, Fisher J. Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):111–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Philip M. Faris, MD, and Robert A. Malinzak, MD, who along with E. Michael Keating, MD, John B. Meding, MD, and Michael E. Berend, MD, were the orthopaedic surgeons for the patient population included in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John B. Meding MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institutional approved the human protocol for this investigation that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Meding, J.B., Meding, L.K., Keating, E.M. et al. Low Incidence of Groin Pain and Early Failure with Large Metal Articulation Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 388–394 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2069-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2069-6

Keywords

Navigation