Skip to main content
Log in

Drivers of Surgery for the Degenerative Hip, Knee, and Spine: A Systematic Review

  • Symposium: Value Based Healthcare
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Surgical treatment for degenerative conditions of the hip, knee, and spine has an impact on overall healthcare spending. Surgical rates have increased dramatically and considerable regional variation has been observed. The reasons behind these increasing rates and variation across regions have not been well elucidated.

Questions/purposes

We therefore identified demographic (D), social structure (SS), health belief (HB), personal (PR) and community resources (CR), and medical need (MN) factors that drive rates of hip, knee, and spine surgery.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review to include all observational, population-based studies that compared surgical rates with potential drivers (D, SS, HB, PR, CR, MN). We searched PubMed combining key words focusing on (1) disease and procedure; (2) study methodology; and (3) explanatory models. Independent investigators selected potentially eligible studies from abstract review and abstracted methodological and outcome data. From an initial search of 256 articles, we found 37 to be potentially eligible (kappa 0.86) but only 28 met all our inclusion criteria.

Results

Age, nonminority, insurance coverage, and surgeon enthusiasm all increased surgical rates. Rates of arthroplasty were higher for females with higher education, income, obesity, rurality, willingness to consider surgery, and prevalence of disease, whereas spinal rates increased with male gender, lower income, and the availability of advanced imaging.

Conclusions

Regional variation in these procedures exists because they are examples of preference-sensitive care. With strategies that may affect change in factors that are potentially modifiable by behavior or resources, extreme variation in rates may be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam JA, Khaw FM, Thomson RG, Gregg PJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Patient decision aids in joint replacement surgery: a literature review and an opinion survey of consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:198–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agabiti N, Picciotto S, Cesaroni G, Bisanti L, Forastiere F, Onorati R, Pacelli B, Pandolfi P, Russo A, Spadea T, Perucci CA; Italian Study Group on Inequalities in Health Care. The influence of socioeconomic status on utilization and outcomes of elective total hip replacement: a multicity population-based longitudinal study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States: Prevalence, Societal and Economic Cost. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. United States Bone and Joint Decade: The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behavior. 1995;36:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Appleby J, Raleigh V, Frosini F, Bevan G, Gao H, Lyscom T. Variations in Health Care: The Good, the Bad and the Inexplicable. London: The King’s Fund; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bederman SS, Coyte PC, Kreder HJ, Mahomed NN, McIsaac WJ, Wright JG. Who’s in the driver’s seat? The influence of patient and physician enthusiasm on regional variation in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery: a population-based study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:481–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bederman SS, Kreder HJ, Weller I, Finkelstein JA, Ford MH, Yee AJ. The who, what and when of surgery for the degenerative lumbar spine: a population-based study of surgeon factors, surgical procedures, recent trends and reoperation rates. Can J Surg. 2009;52:283–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:171–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chassin MR. Explaining geographic variations: the enthusiasm hypothesis. Med Care. 1993;31:YS37–YS44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cookson R, Dusheiko M, Hardman G. Socioeconomic inequality in small area use of elective total hip replacement in the English National Health Service in 1991 and 2001. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(Suppl 1):510–517.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper RA, Getzen TE, Laud P. Economic expansion is a major determinant of physician supply and utilization. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:675–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coyte P, Wang PP, Hawker G, Wright JG. The relationship between variations in knee replacement utilization rates and the reported prevalence of arthritis in Ontario, Canada. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:2403–2412.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Coyte PC, Hawker G, Wright JG. Variations in knee replacement utilization rates and the supply of health professionals in Ontario, Canada. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:1214–1220.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT, Geesink R. Hydroxyapatite femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty: 10- to 13-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:101–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein J, Howe J, Ciol M, Mulley AG Jr. Involving patients in clinical decisions: impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery. Med Care. 2000;38:959–969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dixon T, Shaw ME, Dieppe PA. Analysis of regional variation in hip and knee joint replacement rates in England using Hospital Episodes Statistics. Public Health. 2006; 120:83–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Song J, Sohn MW, Feinglass JM, Chang HJ, Chang RW. Age and racial/ethnic disparities in arthritis-related hip and knee surgeries. Med Care. 2008;46:200–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dunlop DD, Song J, Manheim LM, Chang RW. Racial disparities in joint replacement use among older adults. Med Care. 2003;41:288–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Engh CA Jr, Claus AM, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. Long-term results using the anatomic medullary locking hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:137–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher ES, Wennberg JE. Health care quality, geographic variations, and the challenge of supply-sensitive care. Perspect Biol Med. 2003;46:69–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedman B, Elixhauser A. The changing distribution of a major surgical procedure across hospitals: were supply shifts and disequilibrium important? Health Econ. 1995;4:301–314.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 1969;37:424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Groman R, Ginsberg J, American College of Physicians. Racial and ethnic disparities in health care: a position paper of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:226–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanchate AD, Zhang Y, Felson DT, Ash AS. Exploring the determinants of racial and ethnic disparities in total knee arthroplasty: health insurance, income, and assets. Med Care. 2008;46:481–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harris IA, Dao AT. Trends of spinal fusion surgery in Australia: 1997 to 2006. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:783–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hawker GA, Guan J, Croxford R, Coyte PC, Glazier RH, Harvey BJ, Wright JG, Williams JI, Badley EM. A prospective population-based study of the predictors of undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3212–3220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Glazier RH, Coyte PC, Harvey B, Williams JI, Badley EM. The effect of education and income on need and willingness to undergo total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:3331–3339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jarvholm B, From C, Lewold S, Malchau H, Vingard E. Incidence of surgically treated osteoarthritis in the hip and knee in male construction workers. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:275–278.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Judge A, Welton NJ, Sandhu J, Ben-Shlomo Y. Geographical variation in the provision of elective primary hip and knee replacement: the role of socio-demographic, hospital and distance variables. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009;31:413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Judge A, Welton NJ, Sandhu J, Ben-Shlomo Y. Equity in access to total joint replacement of the hip and knee in England: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katz BP, Freund DA, Heck DA, Dittus RS, Paul JE, Wright J, Coyte P, Holleman E, Hawker G. Demographic variation in the rate of knee replacement: a multi-year analysis. Health Serv Res. 1996;31:125–140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kelly MA, Clarke HD. Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:51–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lurie JD, Birkmeyer NJ, Weinstein JN. Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:616–620.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Majeed A, Eliahoo J, Bardsley M, Morgan D, Bindman AB. Variation in coronary artery bypass grafting, angioplasty, cataract surgery, and hip replacement rates among primary care groups in London: association with population and practice characteristics. J Public Health Med. 2002;24:21–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Makela KT, Peltola M, Hakkinen U, Remes V. Geographical variation in incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 34,642 replacements. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:633–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Maloney WJ, Schmalzried T, Harris WH. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:70–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McWilliams JM, Meara E, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Medicare spending for previously uninsured adults. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:757–766.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mendenhall S. 2010 spinal industry update. Orthopedic Network News. 2010;21:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mendenhall S. 2011 CMS payment update. Orthopedic Network News. 2010;21:22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Naylor CD. Variations in selected surgical procedures and medical diagnoses by year and region. In: Goel V, Williams JI, Anderson GM, Blackstein-Hirsch P, Fooks C, Naylor D, eds. Patterns of Health Care in Ontario. The ICES Practice Atlas. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association; 1996:51–146.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nelson CL. Disparities in orthopaedic surgical intervention. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(Suppl 1):S13–S17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Peterson MG, Hollenberg JP, Szatrowski TP, Johanson NA, Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1530–1539.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;309:136–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Skinner J, Zhou W, Weinstein J. The influence of income and race on total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2159–2166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Steel N, Clark A, Lang IA, Wallace RB, Melzer D. Racial disparities in receipt of hip and knee joint replacements are not explained by need: the Health and Retirement Study 1998–2004. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:629–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Theis KA, Helmick CG, Hootman JM. Arthritis burden and impact are greater among US women than men: intervention opportunities. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007;16:441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vince KG, Insall JN, Kelly MA. The total condylar prosthesis. 10- to 12-year results of a cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:793–797.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Volinn E, Mayer J, Diehr P, Van Koevering D, Connell FA, Loeser JD. Small area analysis of surgery for low-back pain. Spine. 1992;17:575–581.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang Y, Simpson JA, Wluka AE, Urquhart DM, English DR, Giles GG, Graves S, Cicuttini FM. Reduced rates of primary joint replacement for osteoarthritis in Italian and Greek migrants to Australia: the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Weinstein JN, Bronner KK, Morgan TS, Wennberg JE. Trends and geographic variations in major surgery for degenerative diseases of the hip, knee, and spine. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:VAR81–VAR89.

  54. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2707–2714.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2257–2270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H; SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:794–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A. Health care delivery in Maine I: patterns of use of common surgical procedures. J Maine Med Assoc. 1975;66:123–130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982;246:120–134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wennberg JE, Peters PG Jr. Unwarranted variations in the quality of health care: can the law help medicine provide a remedy/remedies? Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 2004:9–25.

  60. Wilson MG, May DS, Kelly JJ. Racial differences in the use of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis among older Americans. Ethn Dis. 1994;4:57–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wright JG, Hawker GA, Bombardier C, Croxford R, Dittus RS, Freund DA, Coyte PC. Physician enthusiasm as an explanation for area variation in the utilization of knee replacement surgery. Med Care. 1999;37:946–956.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Linda Murphy and Bob Johnson from the Grunigen Medical Library at the UC Irvine Medical Center for assistance with our bibliographic search.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Samuel Bederman MD, PhD, FRCSC.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search strategy

Performed September 16, 2010

(Physician’s Practice Patterns/utilization [mh] OR Health Services Research [mh] OR Health Services Accessibility [mh] OR Health Services Needs and Demand [mh] OR Hospitalization [mh] OR Residence Characteristics [mh] OR Socioeconomic Factors [mh] OR Databases, Factual [mh] OR Population Surveillance [mh] OR Small-Area Analysis [mh] OR Health Status Disparities [mh] OR Population Surveillance[mh] OR registries [mh] OR Medicare [mh] OR Medicaid [mh]) OR “population-based” OR “population based” OR register OR “procedure volume” OR “surgical rate*” OR “population based” OR “population-based” OR “Medicare” OR “administrative database” OR “claims database” OR “area variation” OR “geographic variation” OR “regional variation” OR “small area analysis” OR “procedure volume” OR “frequency of use”

[742359 references]

AND

Arthroplasty, Replacement[mh] OR Hip Prosthesis[mh] OR Spinal fusion[mh] OR Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery[mh] OR Spinal diseases/surgery[mh] OR joint prosthesis[mh]) OR “hip replacement” OR “knee replacement” OR “spine surgery” OR ((“low back” OR “spine” OR “hip” OR “knee”) and “degenerative” and (“surgery” or “surgical”)) OR “spinal fusion” OR “arthroplasty” OR “pedicle screw” OR “pedicle screws”

[86761 references]

AND

(“determinants” OR “influence” OR “driven” OR “drivers” OR “explanation” OR “explained” OR “correlated”)

[1232560 references]

COMBINE 1 and 2 and 3

[283 references]

LIMIT: English

[256 references]

Appendix 2

About this article

Cite this article

Bederman, S.S., Rosen, C.D., Bhatia, N.N. et al. Drivers of Surgery for the Degenerative Hip, Knee, and Spine: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 1090–1105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2004-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2004-x

Keywords

Navigation