Is Percutaneous Repair Better Than Open Repair in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture?
Open repair of Achilles tendon rupture has been associated with higher levels of wound complications than those associated with percutaneous repair. However, some studies suggest there are higher rerupture rates and sural nerve injuries with percutaneous repair.
We compared the two types of repairs in terms of (1) function (muscle strength, ankle ROM, calf and ankle perimeter, single heel rise tests, and work return), (2) cosmesis (length scar, cosmetic appearance), and (3) complications.
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 32 surgically treated patients with Achilles rupture: 17 with percutaneous repair and 15 with open repair. All patients followed a standardized rehabilitation protocol. The minimum followup was 6 months (mean, 18 months; range, 6–48 months).
We observed similar values of plantar flexor strength, ROM, calf and ankle perimeter, and single heel raising test between the groups. Mean time to return to work was longer for patients who had open versus percutaneous repair (5.6 months versus 2.8 months). Mean scar length was greater in the open repair group (9.5 cm versus 2.9 cm). Cosmetic appearance was better in the percutaneous group. Two wound complications and one rerupture were found in the open repair group. One case of deep venous thrombosis occurred in the percutaneous repair group. All complications occurred before 6 months after surgery. We identified no patients with nerve injury.
Percutaneous repair provides function similar to that achieved with open repair, with a better cosmetic appearance, a lower rate of wound complications, and no apparent increase in the risk of rerupture.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KeywordsAchilles Tendon Wound Complication Open Repair Sural Nerve Repair Group
The authors thank Marcos Paleo Pineda who was chief of the foot and ankle service and operated on several patients; Leonardo Lagos Sepúlveda for checking and evaluating some of the patients; Juan Pablo Araya who was our physiotherapist; and Viviana Toro Ibacache who corrected the manuscript and helped us with the analyses.
- 20.Lim J, Dalal R, Waseem M. Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:559–565.Google Scholar
- 23.Majewski M, Rohrbach M, Czaja S, Ochsner P. Avoiding sural nerve injuries during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:793–798.Google Scholar
- 26.Pässler HH. The percutaneous Achilles tendon suture [in German]. Sportorthop Sporttraumatol. 1998;14:93–95.Google Scholar