Skip to main content
Log in

Structural Allograft as an Option for Treating Infected Hip Arthroplasty with Massive Bone Loss

  • Symposium: Periprosthetic Joint Infection
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Revision of the infected hip arthroplasty with major bone loss is difficult. Attempts to restore bone stock with structural allograft are controversial.

Questions/purposes

We assessed the (1) reinfection rate; (2) rerevision rate; (3) radiographic graft union, resorption, and implant migration; (4) Harris hip scores at 1 year and at last followup compared with before surgery; and (5) other major complications associated with the use of bulk structural allograft to treat massive bone loss in infected hip arthroplasty.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients who underwent two-stage revision arthroplasty using structural allograft to treat massive bone defects in infected hip arthroplasty. There were 17 proximal femoral grafts, three acetabular major column grafts, two acetabular minor column grafts, and 10 cortical strut grafts used. Five patients had combinations of two allografts. The minimum followup was 1.1 years (mean, 8.2 years; range, 1.1–16.8 years).

Results

One of 27 patients had reinfection. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 93% at 10 years with rerevision for aseptic loosening as the end point. Radiographically, three patients had nonunion at the graft–host junction. All patients except two had graft resorption, of which all were mild except two, which were severe. Three patients had implant migration. The mean modified Harris hip scores were 39.2 points (range, 25–60) preoperatively, 67.3 points (range, 40–91) at 1-year followup, and 70.3 points (range, 46–81) at last followup. Other major complications included one patient with dislocation and one patient with transient sciatic nerve injury.

Conclusions

Based on our data, we believe the use of structural allografts is a reasonable option for treating massive bone loss in infected hip arthroplasties.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2A–H

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexeef M, Mahomed N, Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross A. Structural allograft in two-stage revision for failed septic hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, McDonald S, Oakeshott R, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:235–240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ammon P, Stockley I. Allograft bone in two-stage revision of the hip for infection. Is it safe? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:962–965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anract P, Coste J, Vastel L, Jeanrot C, Mascard E, Tomeno B. Proximal femoral reconstruction with megaprosthesis versus allograft prosthesis composite. A comparative study of functional results, complications and longevity in 41 cases [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86:278–288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bittar ES, Petty W. Girdlestone arthroplasty for infected total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;170:83–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourne RB, Hunter GA, Rorabeck CH, Macnab JJ. A six-year follow-up of infected total hip replacement managed by Girdlestone’s arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1074–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2482–2490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dick HM, Strauch RJ. Infection of massive bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;306:46–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. English H, Timperley D, Sunlop D, Gie G. Impaction grafting of the femur in two-stage revision for infected total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:700–705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Farid Y, Lin PP, Lewis VO, Yasko AW. Endoprosthetic and allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:223–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fawcett K, Barr AR. Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fountain JR, Dalby-Ball J, Carroll FA, Stockley I. The use of total femoral arthroplasty as a limb salvage procedure: the Sheffield experience. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:663–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2358–2364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Graham NM, Stockley I. The use of structural proximal femoral allograft in complex revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:337–343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grauer JD, Amstutz HC, O’Carrol PF, Dorey FJ. Resection arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:669–678.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gross AE. Revision arthroplasty of the hip using allograft bone. In: Czitrom AA, Gross AE, eds. Allografts in Orthopedic Practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Williams; 1992:147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gross AE, Hutchinson CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1998:21:999–1001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Herrera A, Martínez AA, Cuenca J, Canales V. Management of types III and IV acetabular deficiencies with the longitudinal oblong revision cup. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:857–864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsieh PH, Shih CH, Chang YH, Lee MS, Yang WE, Shih HN. Treatment of deep infection of the hip associated with massive bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:770–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jasty M, Harris W. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:63–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koster G, Rading S. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:603–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakstein D, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Trabecular metal for acetabular defects with 50% of less host bone contact. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2318–2324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Collin P, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prosthesis for tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:197–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Sreiner G, Zuckerman JD. The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1553–1558.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lord CF, Gerhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Infection in bone allografts: incidence, nature and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:369–376.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mallory TH. Excision arthroplasty with delayed wound closure for the infected total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;137:106–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration: an experimental study. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:245–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Masterson EL, Duncan CP. Subsidence and the cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. Orthopedics. 1997;20:821–822.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McElwaine JP, Colville J. Excision arthroplasty for infected total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:168–171.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Medling JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834–1841.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mowe JC. Standards for Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Murray D. The hip. In: Pynsent D, Fairbank J, Carr A, eds. Outcome Measurements in Orthopaedics. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:198–227.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nusem I, Morgan DAF. Structural allograft for bone stock reconstruction in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty. Good outcome in 16 of 18 patients followed up for 5–14 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:92–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Safir O, Kellett CF, Flint M, Backstein D, Gross AE. Revision of the deficient proximal femur with a proximal femoral allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:206–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni ASaleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2–17 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:234–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BS, Kim WY, Garbuz DS. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:760–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:296–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang JW, Chen CE. Reimplantation of infected hip arthroplasties using bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:202–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Woodgate I, Gross AE. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:75–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zehr R, Enneking W, Scarborough M. Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Mathew MacDonald for help with data processing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan E. Gross MD, FRCSC, OOnt.

Additional information

One or more of the authors (PTHL) received funding from the Royal College of Surgeons of England, the British Orthopaedic Association, and the John Charnley Trust.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, P.T.H., Clayton, R.A., Safir, O.A. et al. Structural Allograft as an Option for Treating Infected Hip Arthroplasty with Massive Bone Loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 1016–1023 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1673-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1673-1

Keywords

Navigation