Skip to main content
Log in

Combining C-reactive Protein and Interleukin-6 May Be Useful to Detect Periprosthetic Hip Infection

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2009 Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

The sensitivity and specificity to detect periprosthetic infection of the different methods have been questioned, and no single laboratory test accurately detects infection before revision arthroplasty.

Questions/purposes

We asked whether preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) could lead to similar sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values as our previous results obtained with intraoperative frozen section (FS) in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

We prospectively followed 69 patients who had undergone revision THA for failure of a primary THA. The definitive diagnosis of an infection was determined on the basis of positive histopathologic evidence of infection or growth of bacteria on culture.

Results

Eleven of the 69 hips were infected. The combination of an elevated CRP and IL-6 was correlated with deep infection in all the cases and showed a sensitivity of 0.57 (0.13–1.00), a specificity of 1.00 (0.99–1.00), a positive predictive value of 1.00 (0.87–1.00), and a negative predictive value of 0.94 (0.87–1.00). FS showed a sensitivity of 0.81 (0.54–1.00), a specificity of 0.98 (0.94–1.00), a positive predictive value of 0.90 (0.66–1.00), and a negative predictive value of 0.96 (0.91–1.00). Combining CRP and IL-6 provided similar sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values as the FSs.

Conclusions

Our data suggest the combination of CRP and IL-6 would be a useful serologic tool to complement others when diagnosing periprosthetic infection.

Level of Evidence

Level I, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Athanasou NA, Pandey R, de Steiger R, Crook D, Smith PM. Diagnosis of infection by frozen section during revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:28–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banit DM, Kaufer H, Hartford JM. Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:230–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrack RL, Harris WH. The value of aspiration of the hip before total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:66–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bottner M, Wagner A, Winkelmann W, Becker K, Erren M, Götze C. Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-alpha: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:94–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:128–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charosky CB, Bullough PG, Wilson PD Jr. Total hip replacement failures: a histological evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:49–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Cesare PE, Chang E, Preston CF, Liu CJ. Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1921–1927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehring TK, Cohen B. Aspiration as a guide to sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:543–547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fehring TK, McAlister JA Jr. Frozen histologic section as a guide to sepsis in revision joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;304:229–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman DS, Lonner JH, Desai P, Zuckerman JD. The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1807–1813.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hack CE, De Groot ER, Felt-Bersma RJ, Nuijens JH, Strack Van Schijndel RJ, Eerenberg-Belmer AJ, Thijs LG, Aarden LA. Increased plasma levels of interleukin-6 in sepsis. Blood. 1989;74:1704–1710.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanssen AD, Rand JA. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:111–122.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinrich PC, Castell JV, Andus T. Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response. Biochem J. 1990;265:621–636.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Honda M, Kitamura K, Mizutani Y, Oishi M, Arai M, Okura T, Igarahi K, Yasukawa K, Hirano T, Kishimoto T, Mitsuyasu R, Chermann JC, Tokunaga T. Quantitative analysis of serum IL-6 and its correlation with increased levels of serum IL-2R in HIV-induced diseases. J Immunol. 1990;145:4059–4064.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsson S, Thelander U, Friberg S. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after elective orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275:237–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lonner JH, Desai P, DiCesare PE, Steiner G, Zuckerman JD. The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1553–1558.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merkel KD, Brown ML, Dewangee MK, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Comparison of indium-labeled leukocyte imaging with sequential technetium-gallium scanning in the diagnosis of low grade musculoskeletal sepsis: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:465–476.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirra JM, Amstutz HC, Matos M, Gold R. The pathology of joint tissue and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:221–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirra JM, Marder RA, Amstutz HC. Pathology of failed total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;170:175–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nuñez LV, Buttaro MA, Morandi A, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Frozen sections of samples taken intraoperatively for diagnosis of infection in revision hip surgery. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:226–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Padgett DE, Silverman A, Sachjowicz F, Simpson RB, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Efficacy of intraoperative cultures obtained during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:420–426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips WC, Kattapuram SV. Efficacy of preoperative hip aspiration performed in the radiology department. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:141–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rand JA, Brown ML. The value of indium-111 leukocyte scanning in the evaluation of painful or infected total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;259:179–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rand JA, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:201–210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts P, Walters AJ, McMinn DJ. Diagnosing infection in hip replacements. The use of fine-needle aspiration and radiometric culture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:265–269.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1869–1875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP. Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:672–683.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Meli RJ, Roberson JR. Hip aspiration: a cost-effective and accurate method of evaluating the potentially infected hip prosthesis. Radiology. 1993;189:485–488.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tohtz SW, Müller M, Morawietz L, Winkler T, Perka C. Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:762–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vreugdenhil G, Lindemans J, van Eijk HG, Swaak AJ. Elevated serum transcobalamin levels in anaemia of rheumatoid arthritis: correlation with disease activity but not with serum tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6. J Intern Med. 1992;231:547–550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Miltner O, Zilkens KW, Wolff JM. Interleukin-6: a potential inflammatory marker after total joint replacement. Int Orthop. 2000;24:194–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Morandi, MD, and H. García Rivello, MD, for their collaboration on the histologic evaluation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Buttaro MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Buttaro, M.A., Tanoira, I., Comba, F. et al. Combining C-reactive Protein and Interleukin-6 May Be Useful to Detect Periprosthetic Hip Infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 3263–3267 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1451-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1451-0

Keywords

Navigation