Skip to main content
Log in

The Ischial Spine Sign: Does Pelvic Tilt and Rotation Matter?

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 February 2010

Abstract

Although the ischial spine sign (ISS) has been advocated to detect acetabular retroversion, it is unknown whether the sign is valid on anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs with tilted or rotated pelves. We therefore evaluated reliability of the ISS as a tool for diagnosing acetabular retroversion in the presence of considerable pelvic tilt and/or malrotation. We obtained radiographs of 20 cadaver pelves in 19 different malorientations resulting in 380 pelvis images (760 hips) for evaluation. In addition, 129 clinical radiographs of patients’ hips that had varying pelvis orientations were reviewed. We found an overall sensitivity of 81% (90%), specificity of 70% (71%), positive predictive value of 77% (80.7%), and negative predictive value of 75% (85%) in the cadaver (patient) hips. Our data suggest the ISS is a valid tool for diagnosing acetabular retroversion on plain radiographs taken using a standardized technique regardless of the degree of pelvic tilt and rotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 3
Fig. 4A–B
Fig. 5A–D

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, Steger-May K, Schoenecker PL, Millis M. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:666–675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drenckhahn D, Eckstein F. Lower extremity. In: Drenckhahn D, ed. Benninghoff Anatomy [in German]. München, Germany: Urban & Fischer; 2003:342–350.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Georgen TG, Resnik D. Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centring. Br J Radiol. 1975;48:259–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:263–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC, Martinez A, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the ‘cross-over’ sign. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:758–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:677–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Köhnlein W, Ganz R, Impellizeri FM, Leunig M. Acetabular morphology: implications for joint-preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:682–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:281–288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study on cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tannast M, Mistry S, Steppacher SD, Reichenbach S, Langlotz F, Siebenrock KA, Zheng G. Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm: reliable and validated. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1199–1205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis–what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540–1552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhard K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams PL. The skeleton of the lower limb. In: Williams PL, Warkick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH, eds. Gray’s Anatomy. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1989:422–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moritz Tannast MD.

Additional information

One or more of the authors (KAS, MT) has received funding from the National Center for Competence in Research “Co-Me” of the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at the University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1269-9

About this article

Cite this article

Kakaty, D.K., Fischer, A.F., Hosalkar, H.S. et al. The Ischial Spine Sign: Does Pelvic Tilt and Rotation Matter?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 769–774 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1021-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1021-5

Keywords

Navigation