On-line, non-Newtonian capillary rheometry for continuous and in-line coatings production

Abstract

Moving from traditional batch production into in-line or continuous coatings production requires accurate on-line quality control instruments. The aim of the present work was to investigate the principle of non-Newtonian capillary rheometry for quality control purposes. In the investigation, three series of acrylic-based viscoelastic coating samples with different types and concentrations of pigments and thickening agents were used, and the rheological measurements were compared to results obtained with the so-called Stormer viscometer and an advanced off-line rheometer. A detailed analysis of the potential measurement implications was also conducted. For shear stresses from 15.0 to 350.0 Pa (the upper boundary), the novel capillary rheometer was found to provide results in good quantitative agreement with the advanced rheometer when sample holding time, and thereby shear history, was properly controlled. At a shear stress between 1.0 Pa (lower boundary) and 15.0 Pa, the agreement was not as good, with a difference in results of the non-Newtonian capillary rheometer and the advanced rheometer between 15% and 74%. The resolution of the capillary rheometer was sufficiently high to allow detection of the rheology changes associated with variations in coating formulations of pigment volume and rheology modifier concentrations. In summary, for fast on-line evaluation of coating rheology, the principle of capillarity has been demonstrated to be a varied and robust technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Abbreviations

D :

Diameter of the capillary tube (m)

f s :

Moody friction factor of the fluid in a straight pipe

k b :

Bend loss coefficient

L :

Length of the capillary tube (m)

Q :

Flow rate of the sample (m3/s)

R :

Radius of the capillary tube (m)

R b :

Radius of the bend (m)

u :

Velocity of the fluid (m/s)

ΔP :

Total pressure drop caused by the friction in the capillary tube (Pa)

ΔP f,y :

Pressure drop to overcome the yield stress (Pa)

ΔP bend :

Total pressure drop inside a bend (Pa)

ΔP f,bend :

Pressure drop caused by the friction inside a bend (Pa)

ΔP add :

Additional pressure drop generated by the change of direction of the fluid inside a bend (Pa)

α :

Calculated ratio between the viscosity results measured by the non-Newtonian capillary or the advanced rheometer and the Stormer viscometer

β :

Calculated ratio value between the results of the non-Newtonian capillary rheometer with and without a holding time and the advanced rheometer

η :

Viscosity of the fluid (Pa·s)

θ :

Angle of the bend (°)

\(\mathop {\gamma_{\text{a}} }\limits^{ \cdot }\) :

Apparent shear rate applied to the measured sample (s−1)

\(\mathop {\gamma_{\text{w}} }\limits^{ \cdot }\) :

Shear rate at the tube wall (s−1)

λ :

Reduced PVC value (PVC/CPVC)

ρ :

Density of the fluid (kg/m3)

τ w :

Shear stress at the tube wall (Pa)

References

  1. 1.

    Gérardy, R, Emmanuel, N, Toupy, T, Kassin, VE, Tshibalonza, NN, Schmitz, M, Monbaliu, JCM, “Continuous Flow Organic Chemistry: Successes and Pitfalls at the Interface with Current Societal Challenges.” Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2018 (20–21) 2301–2351 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cervera-Padrell, AE, Skovby, T, Kiil, S, Gani, R, Gernaey, KV, “Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Production Involving Continuous Processes–A Process System Engineering (PSE)-Assisted Design Framework.” Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 82 (2) 437–456 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    May, SA, “Flow Chemistry, Continuous Processing, and Continuous Manufacturing: A Pharmaceutical Perspective.” J. Flow Chem., 7 (3–4) 137–145 (2017)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Malhotra, G, “Pharmaceutical Processing—Batch or a Continuous Process: A Choice.” Pharm Process, 16–17 (2009)

  5. 5.

    Partovi, FY, “An Analytical Model of Process Choice in the Chemical Industry.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 105 (1) 213–227 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hans-Joachim, S, Goldschmidt, A, BASF Handbook Basics of Coating Technology. European Coatings, Hannover (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wicks, ZW, Jones, FN, Pappas, SP, Douglas, AW, Organic Coatings: Science and Technology, 3rd ed. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schmollgruber, F, Choosing the Right Spectrophotometer. https://www.pcimag.com/articles/100526-choosing-the-right-spectrophotometer Accessed 28 May 2020 (2015)

  9. 9.

    Page, T, Dubina, H, Fillipi, G, Guidat, R, Patnaik, S, Poechlauer, JC, “Equipment and Analytical Companies Meeting Continuous Challenges. May 20–21, 2014 Continuous Manufacturing Symposium.” J. Pharm. Sci., 104 (3) 821–831 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lane, JL, Henderson, KO, “Viscosity Measurement: So Easy, yet So Difficult.” ASTM Stand. News, 32(6) (2004)

  11. 11.

    Gulrajani, ML, Colour Measurement: Principles, Advances and Industrial Applications. Elsevier, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tracton, AA, Coatings Technology Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee, SL, O’Connor, TF, Yang, X, Cruz, CN, “Modernizing Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: from Batch to Continuous Production.” J. Pharm. Innov., 10 (3) 191–199 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gupta, SV, “Commercial Viscometers.” In Viscometry for Liquids. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liptak, BG, Instrument Engineers’ Handbook Process Measurement and Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Durdag, K, On-Line Viscosity Measurement. https://www.pcimag.com/articles/94508-on-line-viscosity-measurement Accessed 28 Jan 2020 (2006)

  17. 17.

    New REL KR140 Viscometer https://www.khushbooscientific.com/website/Cone-Plate-Viscometers-Rheometers.htm Accessed 01 May 2020

  18. 18.

    HAAKE™ Falling Ball Viscometer C https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/3560001?SID=srch-srp-3560001#/3560001?SID=srch-srp-3560001 Accessed 01 May 2020

  19. 19.

    Hammers S (2009) KROHNE OPTISONIC 6300. https://www.fagerberg.dk/Produkter/KrohneOptisonic-6300 Accessed 01 May 2020

  20. 20.

    Electromagnetic Viscometer (EV 1000) https://www.vinci-technologies.com/products-explo.aspx?IDM=601176&IDR=82291&IDR2=82560 Accessed 03 May 2020

  21. 21.

    University of Toronto (2010) AR2000 Rheometer http://www2.mie.utoronto.ca/labs/rheology/instrumentation.html Accessed 03 May 2020

  22. 22.

    Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc (1998) Brookfield Digital Rheometer Model DV-III + Operating Instructions Manual. http://www.laier.be/files/brookfield_operating_instructions_dv_3_ultra.pdf Accessed 24 May 2020

  23. 23.

    Cho, YI, Hartnett, JP, Lee, WY, “Non-Newtonian Viscosity Measurements in the Intermediate Shear Rate Range with the Falling-Ball Viscometer.” J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech., 15 (1) 61–74 (1984)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rabani, A, Pinfield, VJ, Richard, EC, “Rate of Shear of an Ultrasonic Oscillating Rod Viscosity Probe.” Ultrasonics, 65 18–22 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhao, H, Memon, A, Gao, J, Taylor, SD, Sieben, D, Ratulowski, J, “Heavy Oil Viscosity Measurements: Best Practices and Guidelines.” Energy Fuels, 30 (7) 5277–5290 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dao, TT, Ye, AX, Shaito, AA, Roye, N, Hedman, K, “Capillary Rheometry: Analysis of Low-Viscosity Fluids, and Viscous Liquids and Melts at High Shear Rates.” Am. Lab., 41 14 (2009)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Barel, AO, Paye, M, Maibach, HI, Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Abbas, KA, Abdulkarim, SM, Saleh, AM, Ebrahimian, M, “Suitability of Viscosity Measurement Methods for Liquid Food Variety and Applicability in Food Industry-A Review.” J. Food Agric. Environ., 8 (3) 100–107 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Patton, Temple C, “Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion.” In: Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion, pp. 479–479 (1964)

  30. 30.

    Mert, B, Sumali, H, Campanella, OH, “A New Method to Measure Viscosity and Intrinsic Sound Velocity of Liquids Using Impedance Tube Principles at Sonic Frequencies.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (8) 2613–2619 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schirru, M, Development of an Ultrasonic Sensing Technique to Measure Lubricant Viscosity in Engine Journal Bearing In-Situ. Springer, Berlin (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Durdag, K, “Solid State Acoustic Wave Sensors for Real-Time In-line Measurement of Oil Viscosity.” Sens. Rev., 28 (1) 68–73 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Turpeinen, T, Jäsberg, A, Haavisto, S, Liukkonen, J, Salmela, J, Koponen, AI, “Pipe Rheology of Microfibrillated Cellulose Suspensions.” Cellulose, 27 (1) 141–156 (2020)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mezger, T, The Rheology Handbook, 3rd ed. Vincentz Network, Hannover (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kalotay, P, “On-line Viscosity Measurement Using Coriolis Mass Flowmeters.” Flow Meas. Instrum., 5 (4) 303–308 (1994)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kim, BJ, Lee, SY, Jee, S, Atajanov, A, Yang, S, “Micro-Viscometer for Measuring Shear-Varying Blood Viscosity Over a Wide-Ranging Shear Rate.” Sensors, 17 (6) 1442 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mason, WP, Baker, WO, McSkimin, HJ, Heiss, JH, “Measurement of Shear Elasticity and Viscosity of Liquids at Ultrasonic Frequencies.” Phys. Rev., 75 (6) 936 (1949)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hertz, TG, Dymling, SO, Lindström, K, Persson, HW, “Viscosity Measurement of an Enclosed Liquid Using Ultrasound.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 62 (2) 457–462 (1991)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shiokawa, S, Kondoh, J, “Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors.” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 43 2799–2802 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Joshi, SG, “Flow Sensor using Surface Acoustic Waves.” In: Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 555–558 (1988)

  41. 41.

    Wiklund, J, Shahram, I, Stading, M, “Methodology for In-line Rheology by Ultrasound Doppler Velocity Profiling- and Pressure Difference Techniques.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 62 4277–4293 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jørgensen, SB, “Quality Control for Efficient In-line Coating Production.” Technical University of Denmark, Master’s Thesis (2018)

  43. 43.

    Digilov, RM, “Pressure-Driven Capillary Viscometer: Fundamental Challenges in Transient Flow Viscometry.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 82 (12) 125111 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Jones, FN, Nichols, ME, Pappas, SP, Organic Coatings: Science and Technology. 4th ed., Wiley, Hoboken (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kim, S, Cho, YI, Kensey, KR, Pellizzari, RO, Stark, PR, “A Scanning Dual-Capillary-Tube Viscometer.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 71 (8) 3188–3192 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lambourne, R, Strivens, TA, Paint and Surface Coatings: Theory and Practice. Elsevier, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mooney, M, “Explicit Formulas for Slip and Fluidity.” J. Rheol. (1929–1932), 2 (2) 210–222 (1931)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, X, Fundamentals of Fiber Science. DEStech Publications, Lancaster (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Schramm, G, A Practical Approach to Rheology and Rheometry. Gebrueder HAAKE GmbH, Karlsruhe (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    McCabe, WL, Julian, CS, Peter, H, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Escudier, MP, Gouldson, IW, Pereira, AS, Pinho, FT, Poole, RJ, “On the Reproducibility of the Rheology of Shear-Thinning Liquids.” J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech., 97 (2–3) 99–124 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    “Rheology and Viscosity Measurements: Their Relation to the Properties of Water-based Coatings.” Pigment Resin Technol. 23(3) 11–13 (1994)

  53. 53.

    Eley, RR, “Applied Rheology in the Protective and Decorative Coatings Industry.” Rheol. Rev., 2005 173 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Brookfield KU-2 Viscometer Operating Instructions. Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, INC, Middleboro (2004)

  55. 55.

    Bird, RB, Stewart, WE, Lightfoot, EN, Transport Phenomena. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gersten, K, Boundary-Layer Theory. Springer, Berlin (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yilmaz, MT, Vatansever, C, “Three Interval Thixotropy Test to Determine Structural Regeneration of a Glucomannan Based Hydrocolloid Film at Air/Water Interface: Interfacial, Molecular, Thermal and Surface Characterization.” Food Hydrocoll., 61 458–468 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Cragg, LH, Oene, HV, “Shear Dependence in the Viscometry of High Polymer Solutions: A New Variable-Shear Capillary Viscometer.” Can. J. Chem., 39 (1) 203–215 (1961)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Marvin, RS, “The Accuracy of Measurements of Viscosity of Liquids.” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A, 75 (6) 535–540 (1971)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Southern, JH, Roger, SP, “The Properties of Polyethylene Crystallized Under the Orientation and Pressure Effects of a Pressure Capillary Viscometer.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 14 (9) 2305–2317 (1970)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kamal, MR, Hla, N, “Capillary Viscometry: A Complete Analysis Including Pressure and Viscous Heating Effects.” Polym. Eng. Sci., 20 (2) 109–119 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Churaev, NV, Sobolev, VD, Somov, AN, “Slippage of Liquids Over Lyophobic Solid Surfaces.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 97 (2) 574–581 (1984)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Pit, R, Hervet, H, Leger, L, “Direct Experimental Evidence of Slip in Hexadecane: Solid Interfaces.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 85 (5) 980 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Craig, VSJ, Chiara, N, David, RMW, “Shear-Dependent Boundary Slip in an Aqueous Newtonian Liquid.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 87 (5) 054504 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Luk, S, Raj, M, Diran, A, “Experimental Observations of Wall Slip: Tube and Packed Bed Flow.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26 (8) 1609–1616 (1987)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Granick, S, Yingxi, Z, Hyunjung, L, “Slippery Questions About Complex Fluids Flowing Past Solids.” Nat. Mater., 2 (4) 221 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Malengo, A, “Surface Tension Effects in Capillary Viscometers: An Evaluation with an Experimental Comparative Analysis.” Metrologia, 46 (5) 496 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kim, S, Cho, YI, Hogenauer, WN, Kensey, KR, “A Method of Isolating Surface Tension and Yield Stress Effects in a U-Shaped Scanning Capillary-Tube Viscometer Using a Casson Model.” J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech., 103 (2–3) 205–219 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Einfeldt, J, “Comments on High-Accuracy Viscosity Measurements Using Capillary Viscometers.” Metrologia, 38 (5) 459 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Uitterdijk, SJ, “Method for Reducing Surface-Tension Effects in Relative Viscosity Measurements with Ostwald-Type Viscometers.” Metrologia, 34 (2) 153 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wedlake, GD, Vera, JH, Ratcliff, GA, “Identification of a Previously Undetected Source of Systematic Error in Capillary Viscometry Measurements.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 50 (1) 93–98 (1979)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Einfeldt, J, Schmelzer, N, “Theory of Capillary Viscometers Taking into Account Surface Tension Effects.” Rheol. Acta, 21 (1) 95–102 (1982)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Karasawa, M, Hasegawa, T, Narumi, T, “Measurement of Dynamic Surface Tension of Surfactant Solutions.” Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi, 35 (5) 265–271 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Barnes, HA, Hutton, JF, Walters, K, An Introduction to Rheology, Vol. 3. Elsevier, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Bird, RB, Armstrong, RC, Hassager, O, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids. Vol. 1. Fluid Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Walawender, WP, Te, YC, David, FC, “An Approximate Casson Fluid Model for Tube Flow of Blood.” Biorheology, 12 (2) 111–119 (1975)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Clement, K, Fangel, P, Jensen, AD, Thomsen, K, Kemiske enhedsoperationer. (In Danish). Polyteknisk Forlag, Kongens Lyngby (2004)

  78. 78.

    Ji, H, Lim, HM, Chang, YW, “Comparison of the Viscosity of Ceramic Slurries Using a Rotational Rheometer and a Vibrational Viscometer.” J. Korean Ceram. Soc., 49 (6) 542 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Nwosu, OU, Ewulonu, CM, “Rheological Behaviour of Eco-friendly Drilling Fluids from Biopolymers.” J. Polym. Biopolym. Phys. Chem., 2 (3) 50–54 (2014)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Eley, RR, “Applied Rheology and Architectural Coating Performance.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 16 (2) 263–305 (2019)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    ASTM D281-95 (2007) Standard Test Method for Oil Absorption of Pigments by Spatula Rub-out. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2007) https://doi.org/10.1520/d0281-95r07.

Download references

Acknowledgment

Financial support from The Hempel Foundation to CoaST (The Hempel Foundation Coating Science and Technology Centre) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Kiil.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, S., Weinell, C.E., Okkels, F. et al. On-line, non-Newtonian capillary rheometry for continuous and in-line coatings production. J Coat Technol Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-020-00447-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • On-line measurement
  • Quality control
  • Viscosity
  • Capillary rheometer