Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 913–925 | Cite as

Separation of Sucrose and Reducing Sugar in Cane Molasses by Nanofiltration

Original Paper
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Recovery of sugars from cane molasses is a promising approach to increase the added value of molasses and reduce its environmental pollution. In this work, for the first time, nanofiltration (NF) was used for the separation of sucrose and reducing sugar in cane molasses by a cascade diafiltration-concentration process. The retention difference between sucrose and reducing sugar by all the tested NF membranes was not distinct at 25 °C, while due to the thermal-induced pore size change and enhanced solute diffusivity, the NF retention behavior changed significantly at 60 °C, and the DL membrane with a sucrose retention of 96% and a reducing sugar retention 5% was selected for the process optimization and modeling. High temperature (55–60 °C), low permeate flux (below 15 Lm−2 h−1), and high sugar concentration resulted in a low retention of reducing sugar due to the dominant diffusive mass transfer, which was desirable for the molasses separation by NF. Mathematical modeling could well predict the diafiltration and concentration processes if using right sugar retention data. The deviations between prediction lines and experimental data in the cross-flow filtration of real solution were mainly caused by the permeate flux variation rather than membrane fouling. After diafiltration, the ratio of sucrose in total molasses sugar increased from 76.1 to 87.9%, while in the permeate of the second concentration step, the ratio of sucrose was only 2.4%. Thus, the retentate of diafiltration could be directly used for sucrose crystallization to avoid the accumulation of reducing sugar and salts, and the permeate of the second concentration step could be concentrated by NF270 at room temperature to produce syrup drinking.

Keywords

Diafiltration Membrane filtration Sugar recovery Molasses purification Modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Development Center of Water Treatment Technology, Hangzhou, for kindly providing membrane samples used in this study.

References

  1. Altmann, K., Clawin-Rädecker, I., Hoffmann, W., & Lorenzen, P. C. (2016). Nanofiltration enrichment of milk oligosaccharides (MOS) in relation to process parameters. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 9(11), 1924–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baikow, V. E. (2013). Final molasses. In Manufacture and refining of raw cane sugar (pp. 218–224): Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Bandini, S., & Morelli, V. (2017). Effect of temperature, pH and composition on nanofiltration of mono/disaccharides: experiments and modeling assessment. Journal of Membrane Science, 533, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben Amar, N., Saidani, H., Deratani, A., & Palmeri, J. (2007). Effect of temperature on the transport of water and neutral solutes across nanofiltration membranes. Langmuir, 23(6), 2937–2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernal, M., Ruiz, M. O., Geanta, R. M., Benito, J. M., & Escudero, I. (2016). Colour removal from beet molasses by ultrafiltration with activated charcoal. Chemical Engineering Journal, 283, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Córdova, A., Astudillo, C., Giorno, L., Guerrero, C., Conidi, C., Illanes, A., et al. (2016). Nanofiltration potential for the purification of highly concentrated enzymatically produced oligosaccharides. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 98, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, S. J. (1995), Softening and purification of molasses or syrup, US5454875 AGoogle Scholar
  8. Dang, H. Q., Price, W. E., & Nghiem, L. D. (2014). The effects of feed solution temperature on pore size and trace organic contaminant rejection by the nanofiltration membrane NF270. Separation and Purification Technology, 125, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donovan, M., & Hlavacek, M. (2002), Process for purification of low grade sugar syrups using nanofiltration, US6406546 B1.Google Scholar
  10. Goulas, A. K., Kapasakalidis, P. G., Sinclair, H. R., Rastall, R. A., & Grandison, A. S. (2002). Purification of oligosaccharides by nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 209(1), 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearney, M., & Kochergin, V. (2002). Chromatographic applications in the cane sugar industry. International Sugar Journal, 104, 194–203.Google Scholar
  12. Koschuh, W., Thang, V. H., Krasteva, S., Novalin, S., & Kulbe, K. D. (2005). Flux and retention behaviour of nanofiltration and fine ultrafiltration membranes in filtrating juice from a green biorefinery: a membrane screening. Journal of Membrane Science, 261, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuhn, R. C., Maugeri Filho, F., Silva, V., Palacio, L., Hernández, A., & Prádanos, P. (2010). Mass transfer and transport during purification of fructooligosaccharides by nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 365(1–2), 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lameloise, M.-L., & Lewandowski, R. (1994). Purification of beet molasses by ion-exclusion chromatography: fixed-bed modelling. Journal of Chromatography A, 685(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, J. (2008). Study on sucrose separation from molasses by membrane filtration. Master thesis: Guangxi University.Google Scholar
  16. Li, W., Ling, G.-Q., Huang, P., Li, K., Lu, H.-Q., Hang, F.-X., et al. (2016). Performance of ceramic microfiltration membranes for treating carbonated and filtered remelt syrup in sugar refinery. Journal of Food Engineering, 170, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luo, J., Ding, L., Chen, X., & Wan, Y. (2009). Desalination of soy sauce by nanofiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 66(3), 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo, J., Hang, X., Zhai, W., Qi, B., Song, W., Chen, X., et al. (2016). Refining sugarcane juice by an integrated membrane process: filtration behavior of polymeric membrane at high temperature. Journal of Membrane Science, 509, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo, J., & Wan, Y. (2013). Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration—a critical review. Journal of Membrane Science, 438, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo, J., Zhu, Z., Ding, L., Bals, O., Wan, Y., Jaffrin, M. Y., et al. (2013). Flux behavior in clarification of chicory juice by high-shear membrane filtration: evidence for threshold flux. Journal of Membrane Science, 435, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mänttäri, M., Pihlajamäki, A., Kaipainen, E., & Nyström, M. (2002). Effect of temperature and membrane pre-treatment by pressure on the filtration properties of nanofiltration membranes. Desalination, 145(1), 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, P., Hartinger, M., Sigler, S., & Kulozik, U. (2017). Concentration of milk and whey by membrane technologies in alternative cascade modes. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 10(4), 674–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakasone, S., Miyagi, S., Aragaki, T., & Higa, Y. (1985). Process for clarifying and desalinating sugar cane syrup or molasses. US, 4492601.Google Scholar
  25. Nandy, T., Shastry, S., & Kaul, S. N. (2002). Wastewater management in a cane molasses distillery involving bioresource recovery. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ou, D.-Y. (1985), Separation of sucrose from molasses, US4519845 A.Google Scholar
  27. Pruksasri, S., Nguyen, T.-H., Haltrich, D., & Novalin, S. (2015). Fractionation of a galacto-oligosaccharides solution at low and high temperature using nanofiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 151, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ribeiro, A. C. F., Ortona, O., Simões, S. M. N., Santos, C. I. A. V., Prazeres, P. M. R. A., Valente, A. J. M., et al. (2006). Binary mutual diffusion coefficients of aqueous solutions of sucrose, lactose, glucose, and fructose in the temperature range from (298.15 to 328.15) K. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 51(5), 1836–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Riffer, R. (1977), Process for the production of a colorless sugar syrup from cane molasses, US4046590 A.Google Scholar
  30. Saidani, H., Amar, N. B., Palmeri, J., & Deratani, A. (2010). Interplay between the transport of solutes across nanofiltration membranes and the thermal properties of the thin active layer. Langmuir, 26(4), 2574–2583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharma, M., Patel, S. N., Lata, K., Singh, U., Krishania, M., Sangwan, R. S., et al. (2016). A novel approach of integrated bioprocessing of cane molasses for production of prebiotic and functional bioproducts. Bioresource Technology, 219, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharma, R. R., & Chellam, S. (2005). Temperature effects on the morphology of porous thin film composite nanofiltration membranes. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(13), 5022–5030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Susanto, H., Roihatin, A., & Widiasa, I. N. (2016). Production of colorless liquid sugar by ultrafiltration coupled with ion exchange. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 98, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Valli, V., Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., Di Nunzio, M., Danesi, F., Caboni, M. F., & Bordoni, A. (2012). Sugar cane and sugar beet molasses, antioxidant-rich alternatives to refined sugar. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(51), 12508–12515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, X.-L., Zhang, C., & Ouyang, P. (2002). The possibility of separating saccharides from a NaCl solution by using nanofiltration in diafiltration mode. Journal of Membrane Science, 204(1–2), 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao, L., Zhao, H., Nguyen, P., Li, A., Jiang, L., Xia, Q., et al. (2013). Separation performance of multi-components solution by membrane technology in continual diafiltration mode. Desalination, 322, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu, Z., Mhemdi, H., Zhang, W., Ding, L., Bals, O., Jaffrin, M. Y., et al. (2016). Rotating disk-assisted cross-flow ultrafiltration of sugar beet juice. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 9(3), 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process EngineeringUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations