Can Optical Coherence Tomography Be Used to Guide Treatment Decisions in Adult or Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis?
Purpose of review
With the recognition that neurodegeneration represents the principal substrate of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), there has been increased strives towards identifying biomarkers for accurately quantifying and tracking neurodegeneration during the disease course. The retina provides an opportune “window” into the central nervous system (CNS) in MS, with retinal changes in MS reflecting not only local, but also global aspects of neurodegeneration and inflammation operative in the disease. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a rapid, inexpensive, reproducible, high-resolution imaging technique allowing accurate quantification of discrete retinal layers. OCT determined thinning of inner retinal layers such as the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and in particular the composite of the ganglion cell and inner plexiform (GCIP) layers, predominantly related to optic neuropathy, have been shown to not only correlate with high and low contrast visual function in MS, but also global MS disability scores, as well as whole brain and particularly gray matter volumes. Rates of GCIP thinning have been shown to be accelerated among MS patients exhibiting inflammatory activity outside of the visual pathways, as well as disability progression during follow-up. Moreover, baseline RNFL thickness in MS has been shown to have utility for predicting future disability accumulation. On the other hand, thickening of the inner nuclear layer (INL) in MS, the pathophysiologic basis of which remains to be elucidated, has been found to predict the development of clinical and radiological inflammatory activity, as well as subsequent disability progression in MS. Given the potential for OCT to provide insight into neurodegeneration and inflammation occurring in MS, this review focuses on the potential utility of OCT within the clinical setting to influence treatment decisions for MS patients.
The evolution of spectral domain-OCT technology, with improved resolution and reproducibility allowing intra-retinal layer segmentation, has facilitated the determination that the OCT derived measure GCIP thickness is a highly accurate measure for quantifying and tracking neurodegeneration, and conversely neuroprotection, in MS. The strong relationships between rates of GCIP and brain atrophy across MS subtypes over time underpin the insight derived regarding the global MS disease process from OCT and highlight OCT as an excellent complementary tool to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for tracking MS patients. More recently, longitudinal studies are emerging which support the utility of OCT for monitoring the differential effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS.
Although further work is required, there is mounting evidence supporting the utility of OCT in the clinical setting to monitor disease course in individual patients with MS and to aid in the prediction of disease course. As pharmacological treatment options in MS expand to also include potentially neuroprotective and/or remyelinating or neurorestorative drugs, OCT as a biomarker of neurodegeneration and neuroprotection (and neuroinflammation to a lesser degree) may become an invaluable tool in both the research and clinical settings.
KeywordsMultiple sclerosis Optical coherence tomography Disease modifying therapies
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Jeffrey Lambe and Olwen Murphy declare no conflict of interest.
Shiv Saidha has received consulting fees from Medical Logix for the development of CME programs in neurology and served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Genentech Corporation, and EMD Serono & Novartis. He has received equity compensation for consulting from JuneBrain LLC, a retinal imaging device developer. He receives research support from Genentech Corporation and the National MS Society and received support from the Race to Erase MS foundation. He is a member of the working committee of the International Multiple Sclerosis Visual System (IMSVISUAL) Consortium.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 3.•• Saidha S, Al-Louzi O, Ratchford JN, Bhargava P, Oh J, Newsome SD, et al. Optical coherence tomography reflects brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a four-year study. Ann Neurol. 2015;78(5):801–13. This study offers the strongest evidence of correlation between retinal and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patientsCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.• Talman LS, Bisker ER, Sackel DJ, Long DA, Galetta KM, Ratchford JN, et al. Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in MS. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:749–60. This study provided evidence for the correlation between retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) reduction and visual loss over time in multiple sclerosisPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.• Saidha S, Syc SB, Durbin MK, Eckstein C, Oakley JD, Meyer SA, et al. Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Mult Scler. 2011;17:1449–63. This study was among the first to suggest superiority of ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIP) over RNFL with regard to structure-function relationships with visual function and disability in MSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.•• Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Arnow S, Wilson JA, Saidha S, Preiningerova JL, Oberwahrenbrock T, et al. Retinal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography and risk of disability worsening in multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:574–84. This study provides the strongest evidence to date to support the utility of OCT in predicting disability progression in MSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.• Gelfand JM, Nolan R, Schwartz DM, Graves J, Green AJ. Microcystic macular oedema in multiple sclerosis is associated with disease severity. Brain. 2012;135:1786–93. This study was the first to demonstrate microcystic macular changes in multiple sclerosis, as well as identify a correlation between these changes and increased risk of disability progressionCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.• Saidha S, Sotirchos ES, Ibrahim MA, Crainiceanu CM, Gelfand JM, Sepah YJ, et al. Relationship of the inner nuclear layer of the retina with clinicoradiologic disease characteristics in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(11):963–72. This study demonstrates high correlation between inner nuclear layer thickness/volume and inflammatory activity in MSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.• Gabilondo I, Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Fraga-Pumar E, Ortiz-Perez S, Torres-Torres R, Andorra M, et al. Dynamics of retinal injury after acute optic neuritis. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:517–28. Evidence from this study supports the potential role of trans-synaptic neurodegeneration in MSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.• Costello F, Coupland S, Hodge W, Lorello GR, Koroluk J, Pan YI, et al. Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(6):963–9. This study is the first to demonstrate a threshold of RNFL thickness, below which measurements predicted residual visual dysfunction following an episode of acute optic neuritisCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Balk LJ, Cruz-Herranz A, Albrecht P, Arnow S, Gelfand JM, Tewarie P, et al. Timing of retinal neuronal and axonal loss in MS: a longitudinal OCT study. J Neurol. 2016 Jul;263(7):1323–31.Google Scholar
- 40.• Oberwahrenbrock T, Ringelstein M, Jentschke S, Deuschle K, Klumbies K, Bellmann-Strobl J, et al. Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thinning in clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2013;19(14):1887–95. This study supports the utility of GCIP measures in detecting retinal pathology in non-optic neuritis clinically isolated syndromeCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Britze J, Pihl-Jensen G, Frederiksen JL. Retinal ganglion cell analysis in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurology. 2017; [epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 44.• Gabilondo I, Martínez-Lapiscina EH, Martínez-Heras E, Fraga-Pumar E, Llufriu S, Ortiz S, et al. Trans-synaptic axonal degeneration in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2014;75:98–107. Evidence from this study supports the potential role of trans-synaptic neurodegeneration in MSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.• Zimmermann H, Freing A, Kaufhold F, Gaede G, Bohn E, Bock M, et al. Optic neuritis interferes with optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging correlations. Mult Scler. 2013;19:443–50. This study suggests disproportionate localized retinal tissue damage following acute optic neuritis in MS as evidenced by altered correlations between retinal measures and global relationshipsCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.•• Button J, Al-Louzi O, Lang A, Bhargava P, Newsome SD, Frohman T, et al. Disease-modifying therapies modulate retinal atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Neurology. 2017;88(6):525–32. This study is among the first to longitudinally demonstrate the potential role of OCT in monitoring response to disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosisCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 53.Raza A, Mittal S, Sood GK. Interferon-associated retinopathy during the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review. J Viral Hepat. 2013 Sep;20(9):593–9.Google Scholar
- 55.Talmage GD, Coppes OJM, Javed A, Bernard J. Natalizumab stabilizes physical, cognitive, MRI, and OCT markers of disease activity: a prospective, non-randomized pilot study. PLoS One 2017:12(4):e0173299.Google Scholar
- 60.Nguyen AL, Lam J, White R, Carruthers R, Traboulsee A. Prospective study of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in alemtuzumab treated multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology. 2016;86:16. supp P3.083Google Scholar
- 64.Watson GM, Keltner JL, Chin EK, Harvey D, Nguyen A, Park SS. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and central macular thickness measurements among five different optical coherence tomography instruments in patients with multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2011;31(2):111–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.• Warner CV, Syc SB, Stankiewicz AM, Hiremath G, Farrell SK, Crainiceanu CM, et al. The impact of utilizing different optical coherence tomography devices for clinical purposes and in multiple sclerosis trials. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22947. This study demonstrated poor levels of agreement between different OCT machines at an individual level, limiting their interchangeability in a clinical settingCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 66.Rebolleda G, González-López JJ, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Oblanca N, Costa-Frossard L, Álvarez-Cermeño JC. Color-code agreement among stratus, cirrus, and spectralis optical coherence tomography in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with and without prior optic neuritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:890–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Bhargava P, Lang A, Al-Louzi O, Carass A, Prince J, Calabresi PA, et al. Applying an open-source segmentation algorithm to different OCT devices in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls: implications for clinical trials. Mult Scler Int. 2015;136295Google Scholar
- 71.Lang A, Carass A, Al-Louzi O, Bhargava P, Ying HS, Calabresi PA, et al. Longitudinal graph-based segmentation of macular OCT using fundus alignment. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2015;9413:94130 M.Google Scholar
- 73.Lang A, Carass A, Al-Louzi O, Bhargava P, Solomon SD, Calabresi PA, et al. Combined registration and motion correction of longitudinal retinal OCT data. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2016;9784Google Scholar
- 76.Antony BJ, Chen M, Carass A, Jedynak BM, Al-Louzi O, Solomon SD, et al. Voxel based morphometry in optical coherence tomography: validation & core findings. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2016;27:9788.Google Scholar
- 78.Roth NM, Saidha S, Zimmermann H, Brandt AU, Isensee J, Benkhellouf-Rutkowska A, et al. Photoreceptor layer thinning in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2014:29(9):1163–1170.Google Scholar
- 80.•• Huhn K, Lammer R, Oberwahrenbrock T, Lammer A, Waschbisch A, Gosar D, et al. Optical coherence tomography in patients with a history of juvenile multiple sclerosis reveals early retinal damage. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(1):86–92. This study demonstrates retinal layer thinning in early stages of pediatric MS.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 87.Ghezzi A. Randomized control trials (RCTs) in pediatric multiple sclerosis: are they really necessary? Mult Scler 2017:23(7):1042–1043.Google Scholar
- 93.• Graves JS, Chohan H, Cedars B, Arnow S, Yiu H, Waubant E, et al. Sex differences and subclinical retinal injury in pediatric-onset MS. Mult Scler. 2017;23(3):447–55. This study demonstrated higher retinal layer atrophy in the eyes of pediatric MS patients with a prior history of optic neuritis than those without a history of optic neuritisCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar