Opinion statement
Pediatric severe traumatic brain injury continues to be a major cause of disability and death. Rapid initial airway and hemodynamic stabilization is critical, followed by the need for immediate recognition of intracranial pathology that requires neurosurgical intervention. Intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion have been recognized as major insults after trauma and management should be directed at preventing both. Sedation with opioids, moderate hyperventilation to arterial carbon dioxide level of 35–40 mmHg, hyperosmolar therapy with 3 % saline or mannitol, normothermia, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage continue to be the cornerstones of initial management of intracranial hypertension (intracranial pressure >20 mmHg). Refractory intracranial hypertension is treated with high-dose barbiturate therapy to achieve medical burst suppression on electroencephalography and decompressive craniectomy. In addition, those children require antiepileptic medications for seizure prophylaxis, adequate nutritional management, and early physical therapy and rehabilitation referrals. Most of the evidence for care of children with brain injury comes from center-specific practice and experience rather than objective data. This lack of evidence provides the ground for ongoing research; nevertheless, outcomes after traumatic brain injury continue to show improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death in children between 1 and 19 years of age in the most recent data from the CDC [1]. In the USA, TBI in children is responsible for 60,000 hospitalizations and approximately 7400 deaths [2]. It is estimated that 125,000 children are living with a TBI-related disability, with overall life costs for those individuals estimated at $60.4 billion [2]. The care of children admitted with brain injury requires a multidisciplinary team including emergency physicians, pediatric critical care, trauma care, neurosurgery, neurology, physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine, a nutritionist, and social work services. Recent evidence suggests that the presence of multidisciplinary team assessments and protocol-driven approach to this vulnerable patient population could improve outcomes [3•]. For the past 40 years, TBI has been classified predominantly by the level of consciousness after the injury occurs. This assessment—almost exclusively defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score—has been trichotomized to define severe (GCS ≤8), moderate (GCS 9–12), and mild (GCS ≥13) injuries. Because of the high mortality and morbidity associated with TBI, most of the recent advances in management have focused on children within the severe TBI cohort. For that reason, this review will focus on this segment of the disease spectrum.
Outcomes of TBI are affected by the extent of primary brain injury and the severity and duration of secondary insults [3•], and contemporary pediatric neurotrauma care focuses on mitigating or avoiding such secondary injuries. A synthesis of the current state of the literature and evidenced-based recommendations on management strategies has been published—the “Guidelines for the Acute Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Infants, Children, and Adolescents” published first in 2003 and then updated in 2012 [4, 5••]. Other recent advances in the publication and dissemination of information regarding the management of children with TBI include the sponsoring and publication of papers regarding “common data elements” [6–9]. These manuscripts outline the data elements that all future TBI studies must collect—so that studies may be adequately compared and even combined to glean as much information as possible from the data.
The initial management of TBI begins with stabilization in the field and emergency department—including the rapid assessment for primary injuries, a secondary survey to assess for all life-threatening problems, and early neuroimaging to identify intracranial pathology requiring surgical intervention [5••, 10, 11]. Endotracheal intubation for children with severe TBI, GCS <9, is recommended, along with admission to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic monitoring. Avoidance of hypoxemia, hypercarbia, hypotension, hyperthermia, and high intracranial pressure (ICP) and maintenance of age-appropriate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) are the overall goals of PICU care. Intracranial pressure monitoring can be accomplished via different modalities, but the most commonly used are intraparenchymal catheters and external ventricular drainage (EVD) devices. The EVD has an added advantage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. In addition, some intraparenchymal transducers are coupled with the ability of brain tissue oxygenation monitoring (PbO2), although no randomized controlled pediatric studies are available to determine treatment thresholds. Figaji and colleagues demonstrated in a prospective study that brain tissue oxygenation is poorly predicted by clinical and physiological factors commonly measured in the pediatric ICU. In addition, reduced PbO2 levels are associated with poor outcomes [12, 13].
While the absolute goals for optimal ICP have never been demonstrated for either adults or children with severe TBI, most data supports that an ICP <20 mmHg is a reasonable goal for both populations [14–17]. On the other hand, CPP thresholds for children are generally believed to be age specific. Chambers and colleagues have reported critical CPP thresholds to be 48 mmHg for age 2–6 years, 54 mmHg for 7–10 years, and 58 mmHg for 11–16 years [18]. In a more recent prospective, observational study by Allen and colleagues, a target CPP above 50 mmHg in 6–17-year olds and above 40 mmHg in 0–5-year-old age group was associated with improved outcomes [19••]. The pediatric literature has not directly addressed the question of whether ICP control or CPP maintenance or the combination of both is the critical factor in affecting outcome. In a retrospective study by Stippler and colleagues [20], CPP rather than ICP or PbO2 was the one physiologic variable that correlated with outcome after pediatric TBI. Mehta and colleagues demonstrated that in children <2 years of age, those with unfavorable outcome had more hourly readings of CPP <45 mmHg compared to the favorable outcome group. There was no difference between the number of hourly readings of ICP >20 mmHg between the two groups [21]. In our practice, we treat ICP spikes >20 mmHg aggressively while maintaining CPP targets.
In the following section, we will summarize the care of the child with severe TBI with a specific focus on management of intracranial hypertension.
Treatment
After stabilization outlined above, there are pharmacological, interventional, and surgical procedures to relieve intracranial pressure.
Pharmacologic treatment
Sedatives and analgesics
Sedatives and analgesics are required for general care of all critically ill children to achieve a level of anesthesia for invasive procedures, to synchronize respiratory efforts with the ventilator and to provide pain/anxiety relief due to their illness. General classes of sedatives/analgesics used in children with TBI include opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, propofol, ketamine, and etomidate. A recent systematic review in adults with TBI concluded that there is no strong evidence for the use of any sedative agent over another [22]. No pediatric studies have attempted to compare different sedatives. Most centers use a combination of opioids and benzodiazepines for pain control and sedation in children with severe TBI. Ketamine is rarely used due to reports of inducing increased ICP, propofol is avoided due to propofol infusion syndrome, and etomidate continues to be used as an induction agent to facilitate airway management, but its use in the PICU is rare due to its adrenal suppressive effects.
Opioids
Opioids are used primarily as analgesic agents in children with TBI, while some of the various agents within this class have some sedative effect at the higher end of their therapeutic range. As a practical matter, opioids can be administered as single doses or as continuous infusions, with fentanyl and morphine being most commonly used in children. Fentanyl is more lipophilic than morphine and has the advantage of faster onset of action, but both can accumulate with long-term use and could hinder the neurologic exam. Administration of opioids during intracranial hypertension crises is very common, with the goal of determining whether the episode is related to the sedation level of the child. Despite their common use, the pediatric literature lacks evidence to support the use of these agents. In adults with TBI, the reports have been contradictory. In four reports, three report an increase in ICP and the fourth reports a decrease in mean arterial pressure after administration of fentanyl or morphine [23–26]. It has been suggested that the observed increase in ICP may be related to cerebral autoregulatory reflexes that maintain CPP. However, in a retrospective review in adults, fentanyl reduced ICP by 3.77–8.22 mmHg [27].
- Standard dosage :
-
Fentanyl 1–3 mcg/kg bolus, 1–2 mcg/kg/h infusion (starting dose). Morphine 0.05–0.1 mg/kg/dose, 20–30 mcg/kg/h infusion (starting dose).
- Contraindications :
-
Allergy.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Central nervous system depressants.
- Main side effects :
-
Sedation, apnea, hemodynamic effects. Morphine can cause histamine release.
- Special points :
-
Fentanyl should be injected slowly to avoid rigid chest. Morphine requires dose adjustments in patients with renal impairment.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Fentanyl 50 mcg syringe = 1 USD. Morphine 50 mg vial = 0.55 USD.
Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines are GABA receptor agonists, thereby decreasing activity within the brain by activating this inhibitory pathway. Midazolam has a more rapid onset in comparison to lorazepam and diazepam, but midazolam has an active metabolite and accumulates with prolonged infusions. Benzodiazepines, in general, reduce cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen, ICP, and cerebral blood flow and increase seizure threshold. However, adverse effects of benzodiazepines on cardiac performance (thereby affecting mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CPP) have been observed [28]. While studies in children are lacking, those from adult TBI victims found that midazolam and propofol were equally efficacious in ICP control with no noted adverse event [29–31].
- Standard dosage :
-
Midazolam 0.05–0.2 mg/kg bolus, infusion 0.05–0.1 mg/kg/h (starting dose).
- Contraindications :
-
Hypersensitivity.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Central nervous system depressants.
- Main side effects :
-
Sedation, apnea, hemodynamic effects, emergence delirium.
- Special points :
-
Dose adjustments in patients with liver insufficiency.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Midazolam 5 mg/ml vial = 3.9 USD.
Barbiturates
Like benzodiazepines, barbiturates are GABA agonists that have a long history of use in TBI. Thiopentone (sodium thiopental) has been historically used for rapid induction in TBI patients due to its high lipid solubility, but it has been discontinued in North America. Pentobarbital continues to be available and used for the control of refractory intracranial hypertension after other medical therapies have failed [5••]. When used for this indication, a common goal to achieve is electroencephalograph (EEG) evidence of burst suppression. Barbiturates lower ICP by reduction of cerebral metabolic rate and alteration of vascular tone. Due to direct myocardial and central vasomotor depressant effects, hypotension should be anticipated and treated aggressively. A Cochrane review by Roberts and colleagues suggested that barbiturates should not be used prophylactically to prevent ICP elevations nor as a maintenance sedative agent [32•]. In a report by Pittman and colleagues, pentobarbital was effective in reducing ICP >30 mmHg in 52 % of children, but mortality rate was still substantial in those patients despite reduction in ICP [33]. In a more recent retrospective review by Mellion and colleagues, refractory intracranial hypertension was controlled within 6 h of addition of pentobarbital in 30 % of patients [34].
- Standard dosage :
-
Pentobarbital 5 mg/kg bolus then 1–2 mg/kg/h infusion.
- Contraindications :
-
Hypersensitivity.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Central nervous system depressants.
- Main side effects :
-
Sedation, apnea, laryngospasm, hemodynamic effects, hepatotoxicity.
- Special points :
-
Could result in severe bradycardia and hypotension.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Pentobarbital 50 mg/ml vial = 20.65 USD.
Propofol
Propofol is a widely used sedative in adults because its rapid onset of action and short half-life makes it the ideal drug to allow for frequent neurologic assessments. However, its use as a long-term (meaning several days) sedative in children has been limited due to reports of propofol infusion syndrome associated with long-term infusions. One pediatric report demonstrated a reduction in ICP and maintenance of CPP with the combination of propofol with dopamine [35]. In an adult study in 1990, propofol resulted in a significant reduction in ICP (from 1.5 to 7.3 mmHg) and CPP [27, 36]. In a randomized controlled trial by Kelly and colleagues where propofol was compared to morphine sulfate, they found improved ICP control and decreased need for additional interventions in those patients [37]. As mentioned previously, propofol was comparable with midazolam in patients with head injury [29, 30]. Despite its potential benefit in children with TBI, propofol use is not recommended due to “black box” warnings from the US FDA.
- Standard dosage :
-
Propofol 1–2 mg/kg bolus; infusion not recommended.
- Contraindications :
-
Hypersensitivity to propofol, egg products, or soy products.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Central nervous system depressants.
- Main side effects :
-
Hemodynamic instability, apnea, hypertriglyceridemia, propofol infusion syndrome.
- Special points :
-
Could result in severe hypotension.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Propofol 10 mg/ml vial = 0.93 USD.
Etomidate
Etomidate is a GABA receptor agonist that is predominantly used as an induction agent for endotracheal intubation or general anesthesia [38]. In 1979, Moss and colleagues demonstrated the efficacy of etomidate in causing a significant ICP reduction with a minimal reduction in MAP and CPP [39]. Similarly, in pediatrics, Bramwell and colleagues demonstrated that a single dose of etomidate is effective at reducing ICP while maintaining MAP and CPP [40]. However, the use of etomidate is currently being reviewed in TBI patients because of its potent effects on the adrenal axis—leading to relative adrenal insufficiency in animals and in some clinical reports.
- Standard dosage :
-
Etomidate 0.2 mg/kg bolus.
- Contraindications :
-
Hypersensitivity.
- Main drug interactions :
-
No known significant interactions.
- Main side effects :
-
Hypertension, laryngospasm, adrenal suppression.
- Special points :
-
High doses of etomidate have been associated with EEG epileptiform spikes in patients with seizure disorder, EEG slowing, and isoelectricity.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Etomidate 2 mg/ml vial = 1.18 USD.
Ketamine
Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist that has been historically unused in TBI due to reports of intracranial hypertension in patients with altered CSF flow dynamics [41–43]. In a more recent randomized study, ketamine-midazolam and sufentanil-midazolam were compared as target controlled infusions and ketamine was found to have no significant change on ICP or CPP [44]. In children, Bar-Joseph and colleagues performed a prospective study where ketamine was administered to control refractory intracranial hypertension. Ketamine reduced ICP by 33 % while maintaining CPP [45]. However, the study was not included in the current guidelines because the severity of TBI was not reported for the subjects.
- Standard dosage :
-
Ketamine 1–2 mg/kg bolus.
- Contraindications :
-
Hypersensitivity, conditions in which increased blood pressure could be dangerous.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Central nervous system depressants.
- Main side effects :
-
Laryngospasm, emergence reactions.
- Special points :
-
Maintains hemodynamic stability in catecholamine nondepleted states.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Ketamine 10 mg/ml vial = 0.99 USD.
Neuromuscular blockade
Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is utilized in children with severe TBI to improve compliance with mechanical ventilation, reduce metabolic demand, and eliminate shivering. No systematic studies in either children or adults have investigated the utility of NMB in TBI. Chin and colleagues [46••] performed a secondary analysis of the “Cool Kids” trial [47••], and they found that children requiring NMB had a higher number of daily ICP >20 mmHg, longer PICU, and hospital length of stay but no difference in outcome or complications to those who did not require NMB. A potential explanation is the increased severity of illness or injury in the group requiring NMB. A retrospective review of adult patients receiving early NMB showed no improvement in outcomes, but no data was presented about ICP [48]. A recent systematic review by Sanfilippo and colleagues confirmed the lack of strong evidence for the effect of NMB on ICP and outcomes [49•]. Of note, if continuous NMB is used as part of routine care of patient with TBI, continuous EEG is needed to assess for posttraumatic seizures [50].
Hyperosmolar therapy
Osmotic agents are used to reduce brain tissue edema. In cases of intracranial hypertension, they are used after or concurrently with sedation, mild hyperventilation, and CSF drainage to achieve ICP control. The following is a description of the use of both mannitol and hypertonic saline.
Mannitol
Mannitol has been the traditional agent to use for raised ICP after its introduction in the 1960s. A 20 % mannitol dose of 1 g/kg was thought to reduce ICP by two mechanisms: first, an immediate reduction in blood viscosity leading to reflex vasoconstriction, reduction of cerebral blood volume, and reduction in ICP [51]. However, Diringer and colleagues challenged this theory in a study of six adult TBI patients where they found an increase in cerebral blood volume [52•]. The second mechanism is related to an osmotic effect leading to movement of water from brain parenchyma to the systemic circulation, and this would require an intact blood-brain barrier [53]. In a recent Cochrane review [54••], mannitol was found to be associated with decreased mortality when compared to pentobarbital [55] but increased mortality when compared to hypertonic saline [56].
- Standard dosage :
-
Mannitol 20 % 0.25–1 g/kg bolus.
- Contraindications :
-
Hemodynamic instability, renal insufficiency.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Aminoglycosides, antihypertensive agents.
- Main side effects :
-
Hypotension, gastrointestinal discomfort, fever.
- Special points :
-
To minimize adverse renal effects, adjust dose to keep serum osmolality <320 mOsm/L.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Mannitol powder = 0.05 USD.
Hypertonic saline
The movement of sodium across the blood-brain barrier is low; therefore, the movement of water from the brain into the systemic circulation is mostly affected by the osmolality to which sodium is the major contributor. Various formulations are available, ranging from 2 to 23.4 % saline concentrations. In adult literature, a dose of hypertonic saline resulted in a reduction of ICP by 3.04–9.76 mmHg [27], and given as bolus therapy, it was more effective than mannitol in lowering the cumulative and daily ICP burdens after severe TBI [57••]. In a pediatric double-blind, crossover study, 3 % saline resulted in a more significant reduction in ICP than 0.9 % saline [58]; similarly, in a randomized controlled trial, 1.7 % saline was superior to lactated Ringer’s solution in ICP reduction and the number of interventions needed to reduce ICP [59].
- Standard dosage :
-
3 % saline 3–10 ml/kg bolus, titrate infusion to effect.
- Contraindications :
-
Severe hypernatremia.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Lithium.
- Main side effects :
-
Central pontine myelinosis (due to rapid correction of hyponatremia), hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis.
- Special points :
-
Could be used up to a serum osmolality of 360 mOsm/L.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Low cost.
Anticonvulsant therapy
Infants and children have lower seizure thresholds [5••], and seizures after traumatic brain injury could lead to secondary brain damage. Nonconvulsive seizures are often unrecognized and can be detected in up to 50 % of patients when continuous EEG is aggressively utilized. In a prospective pediatric cohort after TBI, 42.5 % of patients had seizures and 16 % of those were subclinical [60•]. Therefore, the use of continuous EEG monitoring could be very beneficial for children. Administration of anticonvulsants after TBI is generally intended to prevent posttraumatic seizures and not to prevent the development of epilepsy—which has a complex pathophysiology that is poorly understood. In children with severe TBI, Lewis and colleagues found that phenytoin administration resulted in significantly less seizures compared to those not receiving the medication using a nonrandomized study design [61]. In a randomized, double-blind pediatric study, Young and colleagues found similar seizure rates between both phenytoin and placebo groups for the first 48 h of admission. Pediatric guidelines continue to recommend considering antiseizure prophylaxis for children with severe TBI [5••].
- Standard dosage :
-
Phenytoin 20 mg/kg bolus then 2.5 mg/kg Q12h (titrate for therapeutic levels).
- Contraindications :
-
Hypersensitivity, sinus bradycardia, heart block.
- Main drug interactions :
-
Drugs metabolized by CYP3A4.
- Main side effects :
-
Bradycardia, hypotension with rapid IV push, agranulocytosis, seizures.
- Special points :
-
Slow IV injection should be used to avoid cardiovascular collapse.
- Cost/cost-effectiveness :
-
Fosphenytoin 500 mg phenytoin equivalent/10 ml = 0.61 USD.
Corticosteroids
The pediatric guidelines recommend against the use of corticosteroids for ICP control or outcome [5••]. This recommendation was based on two pediatric randomized controlled trials by Fanconi and Kloti that demonstrated that steroids had no effect on ICP, CPP, or outcome and patients treated with steroids have an increased incidence of infections [62, 63].
Interventional procedures
Cerebrospinal fluid drainage
The role of CSF drainage is to reduce the volume of the contents of the intracranial vault in an effort to lower ICP. The placement of an external ventricular drain for ICP measurements provides this additional benefit. Pediatric guidelines support the use of CSF drainage as a method to control ICP [5••].
Hyperventilation
Hyperventilation reduces ICP by lowering cerebral blood flow (and thereby cerebral blood volume) by cerebral vasoconstriction of arterioles. Concerns have escalated that this maneuver can lead to subclinical cerebral ischemia [64]. In addition, hyperventilation leads to a reduction in cerebral oxygenation and additional ischemia [65]. Despite, the 2003 pediatric guidelines recommendation to use moderate hyperventilation for the treatment of intracranial hypertension, Curry and colleagues found a similar incidence of severe hypocarbia (arterial carbon dioxide <30 mmHg) pre- and postguidelines. In addition, they found a mortality adjusted odds ratio of 4.18 in the cases with two episodes of severe hypocarbia [66]. The 2012 guidelines continue to recommend avoiding severe hyperventilation in the first 48 h after injury; our current practice is targeting an arterial carbon dioxide level of 35–40 mmHg.
Temperature control
Hyperthermia after acute TBI has a role in increased metabolic demands, lipid peroxidation, inflammation, excitotoxicity, and lowering seizure thresholds and, hence, increasing secondary brain injury. Three pediatric trials have explored the effect of 24–72 h of moderate therapeutic hypothermia (32–33 °C) compared to normothermia on ICP and neurologic outcome after TBI [15, 47••, 67]. Moderate hypothermia was effective in controlling ICP but had no effect on neurologic outcome at 3 and 6 months after injury, and in the study by Hutchison and colleagues, it was associated with a worse neurologic outcome, although those patients had severe hypocapnia as part of their treatment protocol.
Surgery
Decompressive craniectomy
The pediatric literature on decompressive craniectomy has been in the form of prospective or retrospective case series with only one randomized controlled trial by Taylor and colleagues [68], which was not included in the pediatric guidelines due to the inclusion of patients with GCS of 9. Each of those studies has used a different type and timing for the procedure, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions, but all procedures were effective at ICP reduction in cases of refractory intracranial hypertension [68–70]. The study by Taylor and colleagues demonstrated improved neurologic outcome in patients treated with decompressive craniectomy within 6 h of randomization in comparison to standard therapy [68].
Other treatments
Nutritional management
Nutritional support is essential for children with severe TBI. It provides the energy needed for tissue repair, wound healing, and optimal organ function. One pediatric study has met the pediatric guidelines inclusion criteria by Briassoulis and colleagues [71], who found no advantage in feeding patients an immune-enhancing diet. There has been no other randomized trials that address the optimal amount of energy needed and what route is preferred.
Glucose control
Hyperglycemia has been reported to be associated with worse neurologic outcome in children, but no clear cutoff has been determined for which treatment should be started [72–74].
Patient positioning
It is generally recommended to maintain patient head position at 30°, with a stable cervical spine collar. Both of those will allow adequate venous drainage and prevent increases in ICP.
Emerging therapies
-
Stem cell therapy in traumatic brain injury (two trials completed, results pending)
-
Lactate therapy after traumatic brain injury (currently enrolling)
-
Intravenous progesterone in patients with severe TBI (completed study, results pending)
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Faul MDXL, Wald WM, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and death 2002–2006. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention; 2010.
Stanley RM, Bonsu BK, Zhao W, Ehrlich PF, Rogers AJ, Xiang H. US estimates of hospitalized children with severe traumatic brain injury: implications for clinical trials. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):e24–30. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2074.
Pineda JA, Leonard JR, Mazotas IG, Noetzel M, Limbrick DD, Keller MS, et al. Effect of implementation of a paediatric neurocritical care programme on outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(1):45–52. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70269-7. This study provides evidence for the importance of a pediatric neurocritical care program.
Adelson PD, Bratton SL, Carney NA, Chesnut RM, du Coudray HE, Goldstein B, et al. Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents. Chapter 1: introduction. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2003;4(3 Suppl):S2–4. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000066600.71233.01.
Kochanek PM, Carney N, Adelson PD, Ashwal S, Bell MJ, Bratton S, et al. Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents—second edition. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2012;13 Suppl 1:S1–82. doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e31823f435c. This is the most recently updated guidelines for the management of traumatic brain injury in children.
Adelson PD, Pineda J, Bell MJ, Abend NS, Berger RP, Giza CC, et al. Common data elements for pediatric traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the working group on demographics and clinical assessment. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(4):639–53. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1952.
Berger RP, Beers SR, Papa L, Bell M, Pediatric TBI CDE Biospecimens and Biomarkers Workgroup. Common data elements for pediatric traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the biospecimens and biomarkers workgroup. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(4):672–7. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1861.
McCauley SR, Wilde EA, Anderson VA, Bedell G, Beers SR, Campbell TF, et al. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(4):678–705. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1838.
Duhaime AC, Gean AD, Haacke EM, Hicks R, Wintermark M, Mukherjee P, et al. Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1661–6. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.238.
Levi L, Guilburd JN, Linn S, Feinsod M. The association between skull fracture, intracranial pathology and outcome in pediatric head injury. Br J Neurosurg. 1991;5(6):617–25.
Stein SC, Spettell C, Young G, Ross SE. Delayed and progressive brain injury in closed-head trauma: radiological demonstration. Neurosurgery. 1993;32(1):25–30. discussion -1.
Figaji AA, Zwane E, Thompson C, Fieggen AG, Argent AC, Le Roux PD, et al. Brain tissue oxygen tension monitoring in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. Part 1: relationship with outcome. Childs Nerv System: ChNS: Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg. 2009;25(10):1325–33. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0822-x.
Figaji AA, Zwane E, Thompson C, Fieggen AG, Argent AC, Le Roux PD, et al. Brain tissue oxygen tension monitoring in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. Part 2: relationship with clinical, physiological, and treatment factors. Childs Nerv System: ChNS: Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg. 2009;25(10):1335–43. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0821-y.
McLaughlin MR, Marion DW. Cerebral blood flow and vasoresponsivity within and around cerebral contusions. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):871–6. doi:10.3171/jns.1996.85.5.0871.
Adelson PD, Ragheb J, Kanev P, Brockmeyer D, Beers SR, Brown SD, et al. Phase II clinical trial of moderate hypothermia after severe traumatic brain injury in children. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(4):740–54. discussion -54.
Pfenninger J, Santi A. Severe traumatic brain injury in children—are the results improving? Swiss Med Wkly. 2002;132(9–10):116–20.
White JR, Farukhi Z, Bull C, Christensen J, Gordon T, Paidas C, et al. Predictors of outcome in severely head-injured children. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(3):534–40.
Chambers IR, Jones PA, Lo TY, Forsyth RJ, Fulton B, Andrews PJ, et al. Critical thresholds of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure related to age in paediatric head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(2):234–40. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.072215.
Allen BB, Chiu YL, Gerber LM, Ghajar J, Greenfield JP. Age-specific cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds and survival in children and adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2014;15(1):62–70. doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182a556ea. This is the first study to attempt and determine the age related differences in cerebral perfusion pressures in children.
Stippler M, Ortiz V, Adelson PD, Chang YF, Tyler-Kabara EC, Wisniewski SR, et al. Brain tissue oxygen monitoring after severe traumatic brain injury in children: relationship to outcome and association with other clinical parameters. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;10(5):383–91. doi:10.3171/2012.8.PEDS12165.
Mehta A, Kochanek PM, Tyler-Kabara E, Adelson PD, Wisniewski SR, Berger RP, et al. Relationship of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure with outcome in young children after severe traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci. 2010;32(5–6):413–9. doi:10.1159/000316804.
Roberts DJ, Hall RI, Kramer AH, Robertson HL, Gallagher CN, Zygun DA. Sedation for critically ill adults with severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(12):2743–51. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318228236f.
Sperry RJ, Bailey PL, Reichman MV, Peterson JC, Petersen PB, Pace NL. Fentanyl and sufentanil increase intracranial pressure in head trauma patients. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(3):416–20.
Lauer KK, Connolly LA, Schmeling WT. Opioid sedation does not alter intracranial pressure in head injured patients. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44(9):929–33. doi:10.1007/BF03011963.
Albanese J, Viviand X, Potie F, Rey M, Alliez B, Martin C. Sufentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil in head trauma patients: a study on cerebral hemodynamics. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(2):407–11.
de Nadal M, Munar F, Poca MA, Sahuquillo J, Garnacho A, Rossello J. Cerebral hemodynamic effects of morphine and fentanyl in patients with severe head injury: absence of correlation to cerebral autoregulation. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(1):11–9.
Colton K, Yang S, Hu PF, Chen HH, Bonds B, Scalea TM et al. Intracranial pressure response after pharmacologic treatment of intracranial hypertension. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(1):47–53; discussion. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000270.
Papazian L, Albanese J, Thirion X, Perrin G, Durbec O, Martin C. Effect of bolus doses of midazolam on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with severe head injury. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71(2):267–71.
Sandiumenge Camps A, Sanchez-Izquierdo Riera JA, Toral Vazquez D, Sa Borges M, Peinado Rodriguez J, Alted Lopez E. Midazolam and 2% propofol in long-term sedation of traumatized critically ill patients: efficacy and safety comparison. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(11):3612–9.
Sanchez-Izquierdo-Riera JA, Caballero-Cubedo RE, Perez-Vela JL, Ambros-Checa A, Cantalapiedra-Santiago JA, Alted-Lopez E. Propofol versus midazolam: safety and efficacy for sedating the severe trauma patient. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(6):1219–24.
Gu JW, Yang T, Kuang YQ, Huang HD, Kong B, Shu HF, et al. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for sedation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2014;29(2):287–90. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.021.
Roberts I, Sydenham E. Barbiturates for acute traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD000033. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000033.pub2. This Cochrane review summarizes the evidence for barbiturates in adult traumatic brain injury.
Pittman T, Bucholz R, Williams D. Efficacy of barbiturates in the treatment of resistant intracranial hypertension in severely head-injured children. Pediatr Neurosci. 1989;15(1):13–7.
Mellion SA, Bennett KS, Ellsworth GL, Moore K, Riva-Cambrin J, Metzger RR, et al. High-dose barbiturates for refractory intracranial hypertension in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2013;14(3):239–47. doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e318271c3b2.
Spitzfaden AC, Jimenez DF, Tobias JD. Propofol for sedation and control of intracranial pressure in children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;31(4):194–200.
Pinaud M, Lelausque JN, Chetanneau A, Fauchoux N, Menegalli D, Souron R. Effects of propofol on cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism in patients with brain trauma. Anesthesiology. 1990;73(3):404–9.
Kelly DF, Goodale DB, Williams J, Herr DL, Chappell ET, Rosner MJ, et al. Propofol in the treatment of moderate and severe head injury: a randomized, prospective double-blinded pilot trial. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(6):1042–52. doi:10.3171/jns.1999.90.6.1042.
Gooding JM, Weng JT, Smith RA, Berninger GT, Kirby RR. Cardiovascular and pulmonary responses following etomidate induction of anesthesia in patients with demonstrated cardiac disease. Anesth Analg. 1979;58(1):40–1.
Moss E, Powell D, Gibson RM, McDowall DG. Effect of etomidate on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Br J Anaesth. 1979;51(4):347–52.
Bramwell KJ, Haizlip J, Pribble C, VanDerHeyden TC, Witte M. The effect of etomidate on intracranial pressure and systemic blood pressure in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(2):90–3. doi:10.1097/01.pec.0000199563.64264.3a.
Gibbs JM. The effect of intravenous ketamine on cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Br J Anaesth. 1972;44(12):1298–302.
Ben Yehuda Y, Watemberg N. Ketamine increases opening cerebrospinal pressure in children undergoing lumbar puncture. J Child Neurol. 2006;21(6):441–3.
Wyte SR, Shapiro HM, Turner P, Harris AB. Ketamine-induced intracranial hypertension. Anesthesiology. 1972;36(2):174–6.
Bourgoin A, Albanese J, Leone M, Sampol-Manos E, Viviand X, Martin C. Effects of sufentanil or ketamine administered in target-controlled infusion on the cerebral hemodynamics of severely brain-injured patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(5):1109–13.
Bar-Joseph G, Guilburd Y, Tamir A, Guilburd JN. Effectiveness of ketamine in decreasing intracranial pressure in children with intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4(1):40–6. doi:10.3171/2009.1.PEDS08319.
Chin KH, Bell MJ, Wisniewski SR, Goundappa BG, Kochanek PM, Beers SR, et al. Effect of administration of neuromuscular blocking agents in children with severe traumatic brain injury on acute complication rates and outcomes: a secondary analysis from a randomized, controlled trial of therapeutic hypothermia. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2015. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000000344. This study reviews the effects of neuromuscular blockade administration in pediatric traumatic brain injury on complications and outcomes.
Adelson PD, Wisniewski SR, Beca J, Brown SD, Bell M, Muizelaar JP, et al. Comparison of hypothermia and normothermia after severe traumatic brain injury in children (Cool Kids): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(6):546–53. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70077-2. This study is the most recent prospective trial investigating the effect of hypothermia on neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury.
Hsiang JK, Chesnut RM, Crisp CB, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Marshall LF. Early, routine paralysis for intracranial pressure control in severe head injury: is it necessary? Crit Care Med. 1994;22(9):1471–6.
Sanfilippo F, Santonocito C, Veenith T, Astuto M, Maybauer MO. The role of neuromuscular blockade in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care. 2014. doi:10.1007/s12028-014-0061-1. A review summarizing the literature for use of muscle relaxants.
Annegers JF, Hauser WA, Coan SP, Rocca WA. A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(1):20–4. doi:10.1056/NEJM199801013380104.
Muizelaar JP, Lutz 3rd HA, Becker DP. Effect of mannitol on ICP and CBF and correlation with pressure autoregulation in severely head-injured patients. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(4):700–6. doi:10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0700.
Diringer MN, Scalfani MT, Zazulia AR, Videen TO, Dhar R, Powers WJ. Effect of mannitol on cerebral blood volume in patients with head injury. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(5):1215–8; discussion 9. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182417bc2. This paper provides the evidence for mannitol’s effect on cerebral blood volume and intracranial pressure.
Bouma GJ, Muizelaar JP. Cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and cerebrovascular reactivity after severe head injury. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9 Suppl 1:S333–48.
Wakai A, McCabe A, Roberts I, Schierhout G. Mannitol for acute traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD001049. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001049.pub5. This review summarizes the efficacy of mannitol in treatment of intracranial hypertension.
Schwartz ML, Tator CH, Rowed DW, Reid SR, Meguro K, Andrews DF. The University of Toronto head injury treatment study: a prospective, randomized comparison of pentobarbital and mannitol. Can J Neurol Sci. 1984;11(4):434–40.
Vialet R, Albanese J, Thomachot L, Antonini F, Bourgouin A, Alliez B, et al. Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 mL/kg 7.5% saline is more effective than 2 mL/kg 20% mannitol. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(6):1683–7. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000063268.91710.DF.
Mangat HS, Chiu YL, Gerber LM, Alimi M, Ghajar J, Hartl R. Hypertonic saline reduces cumulative and daily intracranial pressure burdens after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(1):202–10. doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS132545. This study provides the evidence for the efficacy of hypertonic saline in intracranial pressure reduction.
Fisher B, Thomas D, Peterson B. Hypertonic saline lowers raised intracranial pressure in children after head trauma. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1992;4(1):4–10.
Simma B, Burger R, Falk M, Sacher P, Fanconi S. A prospective, randomized, and controlled study of fluid management in children with severe head injury: lactated Ringer’s solution versus hypertonic saline. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(7):1265–70.
Arndt DH, Lerner JT, Matsumoto JH, Madikians A, Yudovin S, Valino H, et al. Subclinical early posttraumatic seizures detected by continuous EEG monitoring in a consecutive pediatric cohort. Epilepsia. 2013;54(10):1780–8. doi:10.1111/epi.12369. This study demonstrates the frequency of posttraumatic seizures in pediatrics.
Lewis RJ, Yee L, Inkelis SH, Gilmore D. Clinical predictors of post-traumatic seizures in children with head trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22(7):1114–8.
Kloti J, Fanconi S, Zachmann M, Zaugg H. Dexamethasone therapy and cortisol excretion in severe pediatric head injury. Childs Nerv System: ChNS: Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg. 1987;3(2):103–5.
Fanconi S, Kloti J, Meuli M, Zaugg H, Zachmann M. Dexamethasone therapy and endogenous cortisol production in severe pediatric head injury. Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(2):163–6.
Stringer WA, Hasso AN, Thompson JR, Hinshaw DB, Jordan KG. Hyperventilation-induced cerebral ischemia in patients with acute brain lesions: demonstration by xenon-enhanced CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14(2):475–84.
Muizelaar JP, Marmarou A, DeSalles AA, Ward JD, Zimmerman RS, Li Z, et al. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in severely head-injured children. Part 1: relationship with GCS score, outcome, ICP, and PVI. J Neurosurg. 1989;71(1):63–71. doi:10.3171/jns.1989.71.1.0063.
Curry R, Hollingworth W, Ellenbogen RG, Vavilala MS. Incidence of hypo- and hypercarbia in severe traumatic brain injury before and after 2003 pediatric guidelines. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2008;9(2):141–6. doi:10.1097/PCC.0B013e318166870e.
Hutchison JS, Ward RE, Lacroix J, Hebert PC, Barnes MA, Bohn DJ, et al. Hypothermia therapy after traumatic brain injury in children. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2447–56. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706930.
Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, Shann F, Ditchfield M, Lewis E, et al. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv System: ChNS: Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;17(3):154–62. doi:10.1007/s003810000410.
Skoglund TS, Eriksson-Ritzen C, Jensen C, Rydenhag B. Aspects on decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic head injuries. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23(10):1502–9. doi:10.1089/neu.2006.23.1502.
Jagannathan J, Okonkwo DO, Dumont AS, Ahmed H, Bahari A, Prevedello DM, et al. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term follow up. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(4 Suppl):268–75. doi:10.3171/ped.2007.106.4.268.
Briassoulis G, Filippou O, Kanariou M, Papassotiriou I, Hatzis T. Temporal nutritional and inflammatory changes in children with severe head injury fed a regular or an immune-enhancing diet: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2006;7(1):56–62.
Michaud LJ, Rivara FP, Longstreth Jr WT, Grady MS. Elevated initial blood glucose levels and poor outcome following severe brain injuries in children. J Trauma. 1991;31(10):1356–62.
Cochran A, Scaife ER, Hansen KW, Downey EC. Hyperglycemia and outcomes from pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2003;55(6):1035–8. doi:10.1097/01.TA.0000031175.96507.48.
Smith RL, Lin JC, Adelson PD, Kochanek PM, Fink EL, Wisniewski SR, et al. Relationship between hyperglycemia and outcome in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med: J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr IntensCrit Care Soc. 2012;13(1):85–91. doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182192c30.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Haifa Mtaweh declares no conflict of interest.
Michael J. Bell declares the receipt of grants from the (US) National Institutes of Health.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Critical Care Neurology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mtaweh, H., Bell, M.J. Management of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17, 21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-015-0348-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-015-0348-3