Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Update 2016

  • Pancreas (T Stevens, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Post-ERCP remains a major challenge, although significant progress has been made in predicting risk and methods of prevention. Facets of post-ERCP pancreatitis can be divided into the four “P’s”: they are patient-related factors, procedure-related factors, pancreatic stents, and pharmacoprophylaxis. New information about risk factors includes a description of IPMN as a patient-related risk, with smoking and chronic liver disease as protective factors. Procedure-related factors include one or more deep passages of a guidewire into the pancreatic duct as a salient risk, perhaps outweighing difficult cannulation or contrast injection, but one that can be mitigated by placement of a pancreatic stent. In addition, placement of transpapillary metallic stents has emerged as an independent risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Although there has been a rising wave of enthusiasm for rectal NSAIDs as a kind of panacea for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, the newest data question their efficacy in unselected cohorts. Pancreatic stent placement remains the most proven and reliable method of preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in both mixed- and high-risk ERCP. Success at placement of protective pancreatic stents is a paramount for safety and efficacy, and technical expertise at placing pancreatic stents widely among centers. The use of specialized techniques including very small caliber guidewires and stents is necessary to approach 100 % success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:425–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Deviere J, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2010;42:503–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DiMagno MJ, Spaete JP, Ballard DD, Wamsteker EJ, Saini SD. Risk models for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP): smoking and chronic liver disease are predictors of protection against PEP. Pancreas. 2013;42:996–1003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman ML. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012;22:567–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:31–40. This was the first large prospective multicenter study of risk factors to assess pancreatic guidewire passage, and found it to be a powerful independent predictor of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, et al. Can pancreatic duct stenting prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients who undergo pancreatic duct guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation? A prospective trial. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1183–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito K, Fujita N, Kanno A, Matsubayashi H, Okaniwa S, Nakahara K, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high risk patients who have undergone prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting: a multicenter retrospective study. Japan Intern Med. 2011;50(24):2927–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coté GA, Kumar N, Ansstas M, et al. Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis with placement of self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:748–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tse F, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P, et al. Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:605–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee TH, Park DH, Park JY, et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:444–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kobayashi G, Fujita N, Imaizumi K, Irisawa A, Suzuki M, Murakami A, et al. Wire-guided biliary cannulation technique does not reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: multicenter randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc. 2013;25(3):295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Halttunen J, Meisner S, Aabakken L, Arnelo U, Grönroos J, Hauge T, et al. Difficult cannulation as defined by a prospective study of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SADE) in 907 ERCPs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(6):752–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kogure H, Sasaki T, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in wire-guided cannulation for therapeutic biliary ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):119–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sasahira N, Kawakami H, Isayama H, Uchino R, Nakai Y, et al. Early use of double-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation: the multicenter randomized controlled EDUCATION trial. Endoscopy. 2015;47:421–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sundaralingam P, Masson P, Bourke MJ. Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase risk during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with difficult biliary access: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1722–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mariani A, Di Leo M, Giardullo N, Giussani A, Marini M. A randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016 Mar 18. [Epub ahead of print].

  17. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cha SW, Leung WD, Lehman GA, Watkins JL, McHenry L, et al. Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-associated pancreatitis? A randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arain MA, Freeman ML. Pharmacologic prophylaxis alone is not adequate to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:910–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H, et al. Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:343–55. The most up-to-date meta-analysis of pancreatic stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, demonstrating that stent placement reduces risk of mild, moderate, and severe PEP and in mixed-risk as well as high-risk cases.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Das A, Singh P, Sivak Jr MV, et al. Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:960–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Freeman ML, Overby CS, Qi DF. Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure, and results of a modified technique to maximize success. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:8–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choksi NS, Fogel EL, Cote GA, et al. The risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and the protective effect of rectal indomethacin in cases of attempted but unsuccessful prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:150–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arain MA, Freeman ML. Pancreatic stent placement remains a cornerstone for prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis, but requires specialized techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:156–8. This editorial summarizes the literature on various approaches to prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and the importance of technical success in effectiveness of pancreatic stenting.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kubiliun NM, Adams MA, Akshintala VS, Conte ML, Cote GA, Cotton PB, et al. Evaluation of pharmacologic prevention of pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;S1542–3565(15):00008–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sotoudehmanesh R, Khatibian M, Kolahdoozan S, et al. Indomethacin may reduce the incidence and severity of acute pancreatitis after ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:978–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Montano Loza A, Rodriguez Lomeli X, Garcia Correa JE, et al. Effect of the rectal administration of indomethacin on amylase serum levels after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and its impact on the development of secondary pancreatitis episodes. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2007;99:330–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murray B, Carter R, Imrie C, et al. Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1786–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khoshbaten M, Khorram H, Madad L, Ehsani Ardakani MJ, Farzin H, Zali MR. Role of diclofenac in reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:e11–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Otsuka T, Kawazoe S, Nakashita S, et al. Low-dose rectal diclofenac for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:912–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1414–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ding X, Chen M, Huang S, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:1152–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yaghoobi M, Rolland S, Waschke KA, et al. Meta-analysis: rectal indomethacin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:995–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun HL, Han B, Zhai HP, et al. Rectal NSAIDs for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgeon. 2014;12:141–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yuhara H, Ogawa M, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Pharmacologic prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: protease inhibitors and NSAIDs in a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:388–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sethi S, Sethi N, Wadhwa V, et al. A meta-analysis on the role of rectal diclofenac and indomethacin in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2014;43:190–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Levenick JM, Gordon SR, Fadden LL, et al. Rectal indomethacin does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in consecutive patients, a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:911–7. A recently published study demonstrating that rectal indomethacin had not even a trend towards efficacy in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in consecutive unselected ERCP, 30 % of whom were considered at high risk.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, Pauls Q, Fogel E, Tarnasky P, et al. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:2101–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Akbar A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Baron TH, Wang Z, Altayar O, Murad MH. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are superior to pancreatic duct stents in preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:778–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li GD, Jia XY, Dong HY, Pang QP, Zhai HL, et al. Pancreatic stent or rectal indomethacin-which better prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis?: a propensity score matching analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Elmunzer BJ, Serrano J, Chak A, Edmundowicz SA, Papachristou GI. Rectal indomethacin alone versus indomethacin and prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for preventing pancreatitis after ERCP: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:1251–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, MMC 36, 406 Harvard Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    Martin L. Freeman M.D., FACG, FASGE

Authors
  1. Martin L. Freeman M.D., FACG, FASGE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin L. Freeman M.D., FACG, FASGE.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Martin L. Freeman has received personal fees from Boston Scientific Corporation and XLumena Corporation.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pancreas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freeman, M.L. Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Update 2016. Curr Treat Options Gastro 14, 340–347 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-016-0097-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-016-0097-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation