Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recent Updates in the Role of Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

  • Arrhythmia (R Kabra, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) or LifeVest may protect against sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients awaiting insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The purpose of this communication is to review the rationale behind WCD therapy and to critically analyze recent data regarding its clinical efficacy. We seek to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the potential role of the WCD in certain populations.

Recent findings

The only randomized controlled trial that evaluated WCD therapy did not demonstrate a reduced rate of arrhythmic death in patients prescribed the WCD during the first 90-day post-myocardial infarction (MI). However, when considering trial results alongside previous retrospective data, patient noncompliance with WCD therapy—rather than ineffectiveness of WCD therapy—remains an important theme.

Summary

The uncertainty of data regarding the use of WCD therapy in patients during ICD waiting periods should be considered as part of the shared decision processes between healthcare providers and patients. Higher rates of adherence are needed to ensure efficiency. Well-designed future studies with appropriate cost-effectiveness analyses are indicated to define the clinical efficacy of WCD therapy on arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic morbidity and mortality in patients who are not yet candidates for ICDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 2018;138(13):e272–391. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000549.Current AHA/ACC guidelines supporting use of WCDs in post MI patients.

  2. Weinstock J. Use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator as a bridge to implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics. 2018;10(1):11–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccep.2017.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elayi CS, Charnigo RJ, Heron PM, Lee BK, Olgin JE. Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death early post-myocardial infarction: root cause analysis for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator failure and currently available options. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2017;10(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005194.

  4. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Hampton JR, Hatala R, et al. Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(24):2481–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Seidl K, Brachmann J, Hoffmann E, Wojciechowski D, et al. Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1427–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0901889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bigger JT. Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Patch Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1569–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Solomon SD, Zelenkofske S, McMurray JJ, Finn PV, Velazquez E, Ertl G, et al. Sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(25):2581–8 Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 18;353(7):744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brewster J, Sexton T, Dhaliwal G, Charnigo R, Morales G, Parrott K, et al. Acute effects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks on biomarkers of myocardial injury, apoptosis, heart failure, and systemic inflammation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(4):344–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikolski VP, Efimov IR. Electroporation of the heart. Europace. 2005;7(Suppl 2):146–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(10):1009–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa071098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks GC, Lee BK, Rao R, Lin F, Morin DP, Zweibel SL, et al. Predicting persistent left ventricular dysfunction following myocardial infarction: the PREDICTS Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(10):1186–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.042.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Swat SA, Cohen D, Shah SJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, Baldridge AS, Freed BH, et al. Baseline longitudinal strain predicts recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction in hospitalized patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(20):e09841. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009841.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chieng D, Paul V, Denman R. Current device therapies for sudden cardiac death prevention - the ICD, subcutaneous ICD and wearable ICD. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2019;28(1):65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.09.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piccini JP Sr, Allen LA, Kudenchuk PJ, Page RL, Patel MR, Turakhia MP, et al. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(17):1715–27. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaspar G, Sanam K, Gholkar G, Bianco NR, Szymkiewicz S, Shah D. Long-term use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with explanted ICD. Int J Cardiol. 2018;272:179–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Owen HJ, Bos JM, Ackerman MJ. Wearable cardioverter defibrillators for patients with long QT syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2018;268:132–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berger CJ, Murabito JM, Evans JC, Anderson KM, Levy D. Prognosis after first myocardial infarction. Comparison of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1992;268(12):1545–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper LT, Mather PJ, Alexis JD, Pauly DF, Torre-Amione G, Wittstein IS, et al. Myocardial recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy: prospective comparison with recent onset cardiomyopathy in men and nonperipartum women. J Card Fail. 2012;18(1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung MK, Szymkiewicz SJ, Shao M, Zishiri E, Niebauer MJ, Lindsay BD, et al. Aggregate national experience with the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: event rates, compliance, and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(3):194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(22):1576–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(3):225–37 Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2005 May 19;352(20):2146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kutyifa V, Moss AJ, Klein H, Biton Y, McNitt S, MacKecknie B, et al. Use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in high-risk cardiac patients: data from the Prospective Registry of Patients Using the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WEARIT-II Registry). Circulation. 2015;132(17):1613–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Feldman AM, Klein H, Tchou P, Murali S, Hall WJ, Mancini D, et al. Use of a wearable defibrillator in terminating tachyarrhythmias in patients at high risk for sudden death: results of the WEARIT/BIROAD. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(1):4–9 Erratum in: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 May;27(5):following table of contents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Niwano S, Sekiguchi Y, Ishii Y, Iwasaki Y, Kato R, Okamura H, et al. Clinical usefulness of wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) and current understanding of its clinical indication in Japan. Circ J. 2018;82(6):1481–6. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang JJ, Bianco NR, Muser D, Enriquez A, Santangeli P, D’Souza BA. Outcomes after asystole events occurring during wearable defibrillator-cardioverter use. World J Cardiol. 2018;10(4):21–5. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v10.i4.21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mirro MJ, Keltner EE, Roebuck AE, Sears SF. Playing it close to the VEST and the clinical guidelines: clinical guideline compliance in HFrEF patients-role of WCD. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41(10):1314–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Olgin JE, Pletcher MJ, Vittinghoff E, Wranicz J, Malik R, Morin DP, et al. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(13):1205–15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800781.VEST trial reference, the main study that evaluated efficacy of WCD.

  28. Masri A, Altibi AM, Erqou S, Zmaili MA, Saleh A, Al-Adham R, et al. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2019;5(2):152–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.11.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Agarwal M, Narcisse D, Khouzam N, Khouzam RN. Wearable cardioverter defibrillator “The LifeVest”: device design, limitations, and areas of improvement. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2018;43(2):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2017.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yehoshua C. Levine MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Arrhythmia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirolos, I., Jones, D., Hesterberg, K. et al. Recent Updates in the Role of Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 21, 49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-019-0746-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-019-0746-z

Keywords

Navigation