Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Diagnosis and Management
- 349 Downloads
Purpose of review
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a non-iatrogenic and non-traumatic separation of the coronary arterial wall. While SCAD represents an important cause of myocardial infarction, optimal diagnostic and therapeutic options remain challenging. We sought to review recent studies and provide an update on diagnosis and management of SCAD.
Coronary angiography is the first-line diagnostic modality for SCAD, with three angiographic features commonly observed in SCAD: type 1 (pathognomonic angiographic appearance with contrast staining of the arterial wall), type 2 (long coronary stenosis), and type 3 (focal tubular stenosis). In addition, adjunctive intracoronary imaging can aid in identifying coronary dissections. Conservative management with beta-blockers and aspirin remains the mainstay of therapy. However, patients with high-risk features and recurrent symptoms may require revascularization. Several techniques have been reported, such as long stents to seal the entire length of the dissection, stepwise stenting starting at the distal edge followed by proximal edge stenting, use of bioabsorbable stents, and cutting balloon angioplasty. Furthermore, cardiac rehabilitation appears to be safe and offers significant benefits for patients with SCAD.
Coronary angiographic classification contributed to the increased recognition of SCAD in recent years. Selecting the most suitable and appropriate therapy based on accurate diagnosis is the cornerstone of management in SCAD. Further studies are needed to establish optimal treatment of SCAD depending on anatomical and/or clinical features.
KeywordsSpontaneous coronary artery dissection Acute coronary syndrome Coronary artery disease Coronary angiography Intracoronary imaging
We thank Amy Zhong, MA for her medical illustration of this article.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Ilhwan Yeo and Luke K. Kim each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Dmitriy N. Feldman is a section editor for Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Elkayam U, Jalnapurkar S, Barakkat MN, Khatri N, Kealey AJ, Mehra A, et al. Pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction: a review of contemporary experience in 150 cases between 2006 and 2011. Circulation. 2014;129(16):1695–702. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.002054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Saw J, Ricci D, Starovoytov A, Fox R, Buller CE. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: prevalence of predisposing conditions including fibromuscular dysplasia in a tertiary center cohort. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(1):44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(5):645–55. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.114.001760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Prasad M, Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Leng S, Liang JJ, Eleid MF, et al. Prevalence of extracoronary vascular abnormalities and fibromuscular dysplasia in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(12):1672–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJ, Lennon RJ, Lerman A, Rihal CS, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(6):777–86. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.114.001659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.• Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Codsi E, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection associated with pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(4):426–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.055. This prospective observational study provides important information about the unique clinical presentation of pregnancy-associated SCAD.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Havakuk O, Goland S, Mehra A, Elkayam U. Pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: an analysis of 120 contemporary cases. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(3). doi: 10.1161/circinterventions.117.004941.Google Scholar
- 12.Eleid MF, Guddeti RR, Tweet MS, Lerman A, Singh M, Best PJ, et al. Coronary artery tortuosity in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic characteristics and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(5):656–62. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.114.001676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.•• Saw J, Humphries K, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Prakash R, Starovoytov A, et al. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Clinical Outcomes and Risk of Recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(9):1148–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053. This study of the prospectively followed largest cohort with SCAD provides insights on long-term clinical outcomes of SCAD. This series confirms the appropriateness of conservative medical management for clinically stable patients. Also, the finding of beta-blocker associated with reduced risk of recurrent SCAD is novel and directs future research.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Saw J, Mancini GB, Humphries K, Fung A, Boone R, Starovoytov A, et al. Angiographic appearance of spontaneous coronary artery dissection with intramural hematoma proven on intracoronary imaging. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(2):E54–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Poon K, Bell B, Raffel OC, Walters DL, Jang IK. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: utility of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(2):e5–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.110.959593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Eleid MF, Tweet MS, Young PM, Williamson E, Hayes SN, Gulati R. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: challenges of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017:2048872616687098. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872616687098.
- 27.Roura G, Ariza-Sole A, Rodriguez-Caballero IF, Gomez-Lara J, Ferreiro JL, Romaguera R, et al. Noninvasive follow-up of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection with CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(7):896–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, Bersin RM, Carr VF, Casey DE Jr, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(2):279–315. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181dd869b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Roberts R, Rogers WJ, Mueller HS, Lambrew CT, Diver DJ, Smith HC, et al. Immediate versus deferred beta-blockade following thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II-B study. Circulation. 1991;83(2):422–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130(25):2354–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Rogowski S, Maeder MT, Weilenmann D, Haager PK, Ammann P, Rohner F, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic follow-up and long-term clinical outcome in a predominantly medically treated population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(1):59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362–425. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Diez-Delhoyo F, Sanz-Ruiz R, Sarnago-Cebada F, Gutierrez-Ibanes E, Rivera-Juarez A, Elizaga J, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: failure of the conservative strategy due to predominance of the false lumen. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(15):e139–e40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Lempereur M, Fung A, Saw J. Stent mal-apposition with resorption of intramural hematoma with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2015;5(4):323–9. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2015.04.05.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 42.Watt J, Egred M, Khurana A, Bagnall AJ, Zaman AG. 1-year follow-up optical frequency domain imaging of multiple bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(4):389–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Serruys PW, Chevalier B, Sotomi Y, Cequier A, Carrie D, Piek JJ, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet (London, England). 2016;388(10059):2479–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32050-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Abbott. Absorb GT1 bioresorbable vascular scaffold. Abbott. https://www.vascular.abbott/us/products/coronary-intervention/absorb-bioresorbable-scaffold-dissolving-stent.html. Accessed November 15 2017.
- 48.Haude M, Ince H, Kische S, Abizaid A, Tolg R, Alves Lemos P, et al. Sustained safety and clinical performance of a drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold up to 24 months: pooled outcomes of BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III. EuroInterv: J EuroPCR Collab Working Group Interv Cardiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2017;13(4):432–9. https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-17-00254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Motreff P, Barber-Chamoux N, Combaret N, Souteyrand G. Coronary artery fenestration guided by optical coherence tomograhy before stenting: new interventional option in rescue management of compressive spontaneous intramural hematoma. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(4):e002266. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.114.002266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Ito T, Shintani Y, Ichihashi T, Fujita H, Ohte N. Non-atherosclerotic spontaneous coronary artery dissection revascularized by intravascular ultrasonography-guided fenestration with cutting balloon angioplasty. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32(3):241–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-016-0397-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Chou AY, Prakash R, Rajala J, Birnie T, Isserow S, Taylor CM, et al. The first dedicated cardiac rehabilitation program for patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection: description and initial results. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(4):554–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar