Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Purpose of review
The goal of this review is to describe the benefits and limitations of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the most important and recent clinical data, and the future applications as robotic technology continues to develop.
Robotic-assisted PCI can reduce occupational hazards of ionizing radiation exposure and orthopedic injury to the interventional cardiologist while offering increased precision and fine control that may confer benefit to the patient. Recent studies have suggested the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted PCI, yet widespread use of the technology has not been fully adopted due to limitations of the current technology and high costs.
Robotic-assisted PCI has potential to benefit both the operator and the patient. Despite some limitations of robotic-assisted PCI, it can safely and effectively be used in many patients with coronary artery disease requiring PCI. The value proposition for robotic-assisted PCI will depend on the evolution of robotic systems and its applicability to more complex coronary lesions, peripheral arterial interventions, and telemedicine.
KeywordsRobotic Percutaneous coronary intervention Occupational hazard Telemedicine
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.•• Mahmud E, Naghi J, Ang L, et al. Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2017;10:1320–7. Important study evaluating the safety, feasibility, clinical success, and technical success of CorPath 200 in an all-comer population at a single center.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Karatasakis A, Brilakis HS, Danek BA, et al. Radiation-associated lens changes in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: results from the IC-CATARACT (CATaracts Attributed to Radiation in the CaTh lab) study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27173.
- 13.Smilowitz NR, Balter S, Weisz G. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiology. CRM. 2013;14:223–8.Google Scholar
- 19.•• Weisz G, Metzger C, Caputo RP, et al. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1596–600. First pivotal trial assessing the safety, technical success, and clinical success of CorPath 200 in simple coronary lesions.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Khalil TM, Rosomoff HL. Ergonomics. Back pain: a guide to prevention and rehabilitation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993.Google Scholar
- 26.•• Campbell PT, Kruse KR, Kroll CR, et al. The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: ramifications for stent savings. CRM. 2015;16:348–50. Study that compared robotic-assisted PCI measurement of lesion length and stent length selection to visual estimation, and the implications on stent savings.Google Scholar
- 31.Swaminathan RV, Rao SV. Robotic-assisted transradial diagnostic coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27480.
- 32.• Mahmud E, Schmid F, Kalmer P, et al. Feasibility and safety of robotic peripheral vascular interventions: results of the RAPID trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9:2058–64. Small study of 20 patients demonstrating the safety and feasibility of CorPath 200 in femoropopliteal diesease.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Brodmann M. Robotic-assisted peripheral intervention for peripheral arterial disease II (RAPID II). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02742077. Last updated: December 16, 2016.
- 36.•• Madder RD, VanOosterhout SM, Jacoby ME, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study). Eurointervention. 2017;12:1569–76. Thought-provoking trial introducing the concept of robotic-assisted PCI for telestenting.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Mahmud, E. Precision GRX Registry. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03278301. Last updated: September 11, 2017.