Skip to main content
Log in

VT ablation: New Developments and Approaches

  • Arrhythmia (D Spragg, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion Statement

Over the past decade, catheter ablation has emerged as an important therapeutic option for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in both patients with and without structural heart disease. In patients without structural heart disease, catheter ablation serves as sole therapy for the treatment of VT. For those with structural heart disease, VT ablation has generally been reserved for patients who experience ICD therapies, and particularly those who fail antiarrhythmic agents. With the growing number of patients with implantable devices as well as improvements in heart failure therapy resulting in improved survival among ICD patients, the overall number of patients needing therapy for VT continues to increase. The past years have witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the arrhythmic substrate in various cardiomyopathies, resulting in substrate-based approaches for targeted VT ablation. Further, the growth in better technologies and techniques for VT ablation, such as the use of percutaneous epicardial ablation, the innovation of multielectrode catheters for rapid mapping, the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for mapping unusual sites, and activation and entrainment mapping of previously unmappable VTs assisted by mechanical circulatory support devices, has overcome the limitations and greatly improved the success rates of catheter ablation. This review summarizes recent advances and novel approaches in both technology and techniques for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. John RM, Tedrow UB, Koplan BA, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Lancet. 2012;380:1520–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006;114:e385–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Knackstedt C, Arndt M, Mischke K, et al. Depression, psychological distress, and quality of life in patients with cardioverter defibrillator with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Vessels. 2013.

  4. Borne RT, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: epidemiology, outcomes, and therapeutic approaches. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:859–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Czosek RJ, Bonney WJ, Cassedy A, et al. Impact of cardiac devices on the quality of life in pediatric patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:1064–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS, et al. Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Investigators: Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295:165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Das MK, Zipes DP. Antiarrhythmic and nonantiarrhythmic drugs for sudden cardiac death prevention. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2010;55:438–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aliot EM, Stevenson WG, Almendral-Garrote JM, et al. EHRA/HRS expert consensus on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:886–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, et al. VTACH study group: Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): A multicenter randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:31–40. First multicenter randomized clinical trial suggests that ablation be considered early, in selected patients who are receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for stable ventricular tachycardia.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Natale A, Raviele A, Al-Ahmad A, et al. Venice Chart International Consensus document on ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:339–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frankel DS, Mountantonakis SE, Robinson MR, et al. Ventricular tachycardia ablation remains treatment of last resort in structural heart disease: argument for earlier intervention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:1123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Izquierdo M, Ruiz-Granell R, Ferrero A, et al. Ablation or conservative management of electrical storm due to monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: differences in outcome. Europace. 2012;14:1734–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Burkhardt DJ, et al. Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:132–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Delacrétaz E, Brenner R, Schaumann A, et al. VTACH Study Group. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): an on-treatment analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:525–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pauriah M, Cismaru G, Magnin-Poull I, et al. A stepwise approach to the management of postinfarct ventricular tachycardia using catheter ablation as the first-line treatment: a single-center experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:351–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tung R, Boyle NE, Shivkumar K. Catheter ablation of Ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2010;122:e389–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson MR, Hutchinson MD. Use of imaging techniques to guide catheter ablation procedures. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:374–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tung R, Shivkumar K. The value of image integration for epicardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:53–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernández-Armenta J, Berruezo A, Andreu D, et al. Three-dimensional architecture of scar and conducting channels based on high resolution ce-CMR: insights for ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:528–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ashikaga H, Arevalo H, Vadakkumpadan F, et al. Feasibility of image-based simulation to estimate ablation target in human ventricular arrhythmia. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tian J, Jeudy J, Smith MF, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced multidetector CT for anatomic, dynamic, and perfusion characterization of abnormal myocardium to guide ventricular tachycardia ablations. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:496–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Komatsu Y, Cochet H, Jadidi A, et al. Regional myocardial wall thinning at multidetector computed tomography correlates to arrhythmogenic substrate in postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: assessment of structural and electrical substrate. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:342–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tandri H, Calkins H. MR and CT imaging of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2011;3:269–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Y, Connelly KA, Zeidan-Shwiri T, et al. Multi-contrast late enhancement CMR determined gray zone and papillary muscle involvement predict appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:57.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tung R, Josephson ME, Reddy V, et al. SMASH-VT Investigators. Influence of clinical and procedural predictors on ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes: an analysis from the substrate mapping and ablation in sinus rhythm to halt ventricular tachycardia trial (SMASH-VT). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:799–803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, et al. Linear ablation lesions for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2000;101:1288–96. Important study of endocardial substrate mapping unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vergara P, Trevisi N, Ricco A, et al. Late potentials abolition as an additional technique for reduction of arrhythmia recurrence in scar related ventricular tachycardia ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23:621–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakahara S, Tung R, Ramirez RJ, et al. Distribution of late potentials within infarct scars assessed by ultra-high-density mapping. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:1817–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakahara S, Tung R, Ramirez RJ, et al. Characterization of the arrhythmogenic substrate in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy implications for catheter ablation of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2355–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaïs P, Maury P, Khairy P, et al. Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2012;125:2184–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tung R, Nakahara S, Maccabelli G, et al. Ultra high-density multipolar mapping with double ventricular access: a novel technique for ablation of ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Della Bella P, Bisceglia C, Tung R. Multielectrode contact mapping to assess scar modification in post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia patients. Europace. 2012;14 Suppl 2:ii7–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sacher F, Roberts-Thomson K, Maury P, et al. Epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation a multicenter safety study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2366–72. An important multicenter clinical trial that described the safety of epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Polin GM, Haqqani H, Tzou W, et al. Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping to identify epicardial substrate in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:76–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hutchinson MD, Gerstenfeld EP, Desjardins B, et al. Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping to detect epicardial ventricular tachycardia substrate in patients with nonischemic left ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:49–55. This study described the role of endocardial unipolar voltage mapping to predict an epicardial substrate in NICM patients.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Piers SR, van Huls van Taxis CF, Tao Q, et al. Epicardial substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a new algorithm to differentiate between scar and viable myocardium developed by simultaneous integration of computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:586–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Berruezo A, Fernández-Armenta J, Mont L, et al. Combined endocardial and epicardial catheter ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia incorporating scar dechanneling technique. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:111–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dukkipati SR, d'Avila A, Soejima K, et al. Long-term outcomes of combined epicardial and endocardial ablation of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia related to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:185–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Koruth JS, Aryana A, Dukkipati SR, et al. Unusual complications of percutaneous epicardial access and epicardial mapping and ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:882–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Della Bella P, Brugada J, Zeppenfeld K, et al. Epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia: a European multicenter study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:653–9. A European multicenter study described the epicardial percutaneous ablation in 6 European high-volume ventricular tachycardia ablation centers.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bai R, Di Biase L, Shivkumar K, et al. Ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: arrhythmia-free survival after endo-epicardial substrate based mapping and ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:478–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tung R, Michowitz Y, Yu R, et al. Epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia: an institutional experience of safety and efficacy. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:490–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Irie T, Kaneko Y, Nakahara T, et al. Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping-guided catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia originating in the left anterior papillary muscle. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:214–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Valdigem BP, Pereira FB, da Silva NJ, et al. Ablation of ventricular tachycardia in chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy with giant basal aneurysm: CartoSound, CT, and MRI merge. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:112–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ruisi CP, Brysiewicz N, et al. Use of intracardiac echocardiography during atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:781–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yamada T, Doppalapudi H, McElderry HT, et al. Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics in idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the papillary muscles in the left ventricle: relevance for catheter ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:324–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bunch TJ, Weiss JP, Crandall BG, et al. Image integration using intracardiac ultrasound and 3D reconstruction for scar mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:678–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bala R, Ren JF, Hutchinson MD, et al. Assessing epicardial substrate using intracardiac echocardiography during VT ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:667–743.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bunch TJ, Mahapatra S, Madhu Reddy Y, et al. The role of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during ventricular tachycardia ablation. Europace. 2012;14 Suppl 2:ii26–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Miller MA, Dukkipati SR, Mittnacht AJ, et al. Activation and entrainment mapping of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia using a percutaneous left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1363–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bunch TJ, Darby A, May HT, et al. Efficacy and safety of ventricular tachycardia ablation with mechanical circulatory support compared with substrate-based ablation techniques. Europace. 2012;14:709–14. This study described the role of intracardiac ultrasound in the substrate-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lü F, Eckman PM, Liao KK, et al. Catheter ablation of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia with mechanical circulatory support. Int J Cardiol. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.035.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tokuda M, Sobieszczyk P, Eisenhauer AC, et al. Transcoronary ethanol ablation for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after failed catheter ablation: an update. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:889–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tholakanahalli VN, Bertog S, Roukoz H, et al. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia using intracoronary wire mapping and coil embolization: description of a new technique. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:292–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Zhiyu Ling and Dr. Adithya Hari each declare no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Dr. Harikrishna Tandri received a grant from NIH.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harikrishna Tandri MD.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Arrhythmia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ling, Z., Hari, A. & Tandri, H. VT ablation: New Developments and Approaches. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 16, 297 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-014-0297-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-014-0297-2

Keywords

Navigation