Advertisement

The Role of Non-invasive Testing in Evaluation and Diagnosis of Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

  • Jason P. Van Batavia
  • Andrew J. Combs
Pediatric Urology (D Weiss, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Pediatric Urology

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) including urinary incontinence, frequency, and urgency are among the most common reasons children are referred to pediatric urologists. Despite this, the workup for LUTD is often time consuming and a source of frustration for patients, parents, and clinicians alike. In the current review, we summarize the important role non-invasive testing plays in the diagnosis and management of children with LUTD and to show how use of these tests can help avoid the need for more invasive testing in the majority of children.

Recent Findings

Non-invasive tests such urine studies, uroflowmetry ± simultaneous electromyography, assessment of post-void residual, renal/bladder ultrasound, and pelvic ultrasound when used appropriately can provide valuable information to facilitate decision making during the evaluation of children with LUTD. While these tests should be employed prior to more invasive testing such as urodynamic studies, they can often act as a surrogate for the more invasive tests.

Summary

Non-invasive tests can help us in our goal of improving diagnostic ability to better classify the child’s LUTD into an actual condition which allows targeted treatment in the hope of better outcomes and more satisfied patients and families.

Keywords

Non-invasive testing Voiding dysfunction Pediatrics Uroflowmetry with EMG EMG lag time 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported in part by the 2016–2017 Urology Care Foundation Research Scholar Award Program (JPV) and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number KL2TR001879 (JPV). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official vies of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Jason P. Van Batavia reports part of his salary supported by the Urology Care Foundation and grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001879). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Andrew J. Combs declares no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Sureshkumar P, Jones M, Cumming R, Craig J. A population based study of 2,856 school-age children with urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;181(2):808–15. discussion 15-6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vaz GT, Vasconcelos MM, Oliveira EA, Ferreira AL, Magalhaes PG, Silva FM, et al. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in school-age children. Pediatric Nephrol (Berlin, Germany). 2012;27(4):597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palmer LS. Evaluation and targeted therapy of voiding dysfunction in children. Urology. 2016;92:87–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Silay MS, Aslan AR, Erdem E, Tandogdu Z, Tekgul S. Evaluation of functional lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: are the physicians complying with the current guidelines? SciWorld J. 2013;2013:341606.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feldman AS, Bauer SB. Diagnosis and management of dysfunctional voiding. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(2):139–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farhat W, Bagli DJ, Capolicchio G, O'Reilly S, Merguerian PA, Khoury A, et al. The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol. 2000;164(3 Pt 2):1011–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bower WF, Sit FK, Bluyssen N, Wong EM, Yeung CK. PinQ: a valid, reliable and reproducible quality-of-life measure in children with bladder dysfunction. J Pediatr Urol. 2006;2(3):185–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W, Chase J, Franco I, Hoebeke P, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the Standardization Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol. 2014;191(6):1863–5.e13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neveus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P, Hjalmas K, Bauer S, Bower W, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children's Continence Society. J Urol. 2006;176(1):314–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dogan HS, Akpinar B, Gurocak S, Akata D, Bakkaloglu M, Tekgul S. Non-invasive evaluation of voiding function in asymptomatic primary school children. Pediatric Nephrol (Berlin, Germany). 2008;23(7):1115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ, Hyun G, Bayer A, Medina-Kreppein D, Schlussel RN, et al. Simplifying the diagnosis of 4 common voiding conditions using uroflow/electromyography, electromyography lag time and voiding history. J Urol. 2011;186(4 Suppl):1721–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benninga MA, Faure C, Hyman PE, St James Roberts I, Schechter NL, Nurko S. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: neonate/toddler. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1443–1455.e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bower WF, Yip SK, Yeung CK. Dysfunctional elimination symptoms in childhood and adulthood. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 2):1623–7. discussion 7-8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Combs AJ, Van Batavia JP, Chan J, Glassberg KI. Dysfunctional elimination syndromes—how closely linked are constipation and encopresis with specific lower urinary tract conditions? J Urol. 2013;190(3):1015–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koff SA, Wagner TT, Jayanthi VR. The relationship among dysfunctional elimination syndromes, primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections in children. J Urol. 1998;160(3 Pt 2):1019–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    • Maternik M, Chudzik I, Krzeminska K, Zurowska A. Evaluation of bladder capacity in children with lower urinary tract symptoms: comparison of 48-hour frequency/volume charts and uroflowmetry measurements. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):214.e1–5. The authors compare the accuracy of 48 hours frequency/volume charts with uroflowmetery with PVR measurements in children with nocturnal enuresis, overactive bladder and dysfuncitonal voiding. While F/V charts were reliable for children with nocturnal enuresis to estimate maximum bladder capacity, both F/V charts and uroflow/PVR data were neeed for children with OAB and DV to accurately evaluate bladder capacity. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akbal C, Genc Y, Burgu B, Ozden E, Tekgul S. Dysfunctional voiding and incontinence scoring system: quantitative evaluation of incontinence symptoms in pediatric population. J Urol. 2005;173(3):969–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    •• Altan M, Citamak B, Bozaci AC, Mammadov E, Dogan HS, Tekgul S. Is there any difference between questionnaires on pediatric lower urinary tract dysfunction? Urology. 2017;103:204–8. The authors compare the Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score [DVSS], the Dysfunctional Voiding and Incontinence Symptom Score [DVISS], and the Incontinence Symptom Index-Pediatric [ISI-P]) in a head-to-head-to-head fashion. While the DVISS had the highest accuracy in terms of diagnosis of children with LUTS versus controls, all 3 questionnaires showed good correlation with parents’ ratings in terms of response to treatment. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schast AP, Zderic SA, Richter M, Berry A, Carr MC. Quantifying demographic, urological and behavioral characteristics of children with lower urinary tract symptoms. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4(2):127–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ, Fast AM, Glassberg KI. Use of non-invasive uroflowmetry with simultaneous electromyography to monitor patient response to treatment for lower urinary tract conditions. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(3):532–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Batavia JP, Fast AM, Combs AJ, Glassberg KI. The bladder of willful infrequent voiders: underactive or underutilized? J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(3):517–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brubaker L, Nager CW, Richter HE, Visco A, Nygaard I, Barber MD, et al. Urinary bacteria in adult women with urgency urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(9):1179–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drake MJ, Morris N, Apostolidis A, Rahnama'i MS, Marchesi JR. The urinary microbiome and its contribution to lower urinary tract symptoms; ICI-RS 2015. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):850–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chang SJ, Yang SS. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement on interpretation of uroflowmetry curves of kindergarten children. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4(6):422–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wenske S, Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ, Glassberg KI. Analysis of uroflow patterns in children with dysfunctional voiding. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):250–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Franco I, Shei-Dei Yang S, Chang SJ, Nussenblatt B, Franco JA. A quantitative approach to the interpretation of uroflowmetry in children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(7):836–46. The authors describe the development and utility of a reproducible and reilable method to interprete uroflowmetry patterns called the flow index (FI). Based on data from 1,268 healthy children, FI was tested and shown to be statistically robust in predicting uroflow pattenrs – bell, plateau, and tower. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Franco I, Franco J, Lee YS, Choi EK, Han SW. Can a quantitative means be used to predict flow patterns: agreement between visual inspection vs. flow index derived flow patterns. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):218.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clothier JC, Wright AJ. Dysfunctional voiding: the importance of non-invasive urodynamics in diagnosis and treatment. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) 2017.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Combs AJ, Grafstein N, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI. Primary bladder neck dysfunction in children and adolescents I: pelvic floor electromyography lag time--a new noninvasive method to screen for and monitor therapeutic response. J Urol. 2005;173(1):207–10. discussion 10-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Combs AJ, Van Batavia JP, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI. Short pelvic floor electromyographic lag time: a novel noninvasive approach to document detrusor overactivity in children with lower urinary tract symptoms. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2282–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Glassberg KI, Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ. Can children with either overactive bladder or dysfunctional voiding transition from one into the other: are both part of a single entity? J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):217.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ, Glassberg KI. Short pelvic floor EMG lag time II: use in management and follow-up of children treated for detrusor overactivity. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):255–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI. Primary bladder neck dysfunction in children and adolescents III: results of long-term alpha-blocker therapy. J Urol. 2010;183(2):724–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chang SJ, Chiang IN, Hsieh CH, Lin CD, Yang SS. Age- and gender-specific nomograms for single and dual post-void residual urine in healthy children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(7):1014–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mostafavi SH, Hooman N, Hallaji F, Emami M, Aghelnezhad R, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. The correlation between bladder volume wall index and the pattern of uroflowmetry/external sphincter electromyography in children with lower urinary tract malfunction. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8(4):367–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    • Tangal S, Gokce MI, Ozayar A, Gulpinar B, Haliloglu AH, Burgu B, et al. Evaluation of a new ultrasound measurement tool for the diagnosis of dysfunctional voiding in pediatric population: full/empty bladder wall thickness ratio. Urology. 2014;83(6):1369–72. The authors compared a new ultrasound measurement, the ratio of full to empty bladder wall thickness (F/E BWT) in 198 healhty children and 126 children with dysfucntional voiding. F/E BWT ratios were higher in children with dysfunctional voiding compared with healthy children and thus the authors conclude that this ratio may serve as a non-invasive tool for evaluating lower urinary tract symptoms in children. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Godbole P, Raghavan A, Searles J, Roberts J, Walters SJ. Dynamic pelvic floor ultrasound for lower urinary tract symptoms in children—initial report on normative values. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(6 Pt A):950–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    de Jong TP, Klijn AJ, Vijverberg MA, de Kort LM, van Empelen R, Schoenmakers MA. Effect of biofeedback training on paradoxical pelvic floor movement in children with dysfunctional voiding. Urology. 2007;70(4):790–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Burgers R, de Jong TP, Benninga MA. Rectal examination in children: digital versus transabdominal ultrasound. J Urol. 2013;190(2):667–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Joensson IM, Siggaard C, Rittig S, Hagstroem S, Djurhuus JC. Transabdominal ultrasound of rectum as a diagnostic tool in childhood constipation. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1997–2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Klijn AJ, Asselman M, Vijverberg MA, Dik P, de Jong TP. The diameter of the rectum on ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for constipation in children with dysfunctional voiding. J Urol. 2004;172(5 Pt 1):1986–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Evaluation and treatment of constipation in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatric Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43(3):e1–13.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leech SC, McHugh K, Sullivan PB. Evaluation of a method of assessing faecal loading on plain abdominal radiographs in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29(4):255–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ferguson CC, Gray MP, Diaz M, Boyd KP. Reducing unnecessary imaging for patients with constipation in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2017;140(1):e20162290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    National Collaborating Centre for Ws, Children's H. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Constipation in children and young people: diagnosis and management of idiopathic childhood constipation in primary and secondary care. London: RCOG Press National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of UrologyChildren’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyNew York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Pediatric UrologyNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations