Abstract
Purpose of Review
The leading cause of voiding dysfunction in older men is benign prostatic obstruction. In the setting of a grossly enlarged prostate (>80cm3), an open simple prostatectomy has been the gold standard for surgical treatment. Here, we will discuss the minimally invasive robot-assisted approach and compare it to the classic open approach and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.
Recent Findings
Literature on robot-assisted simple prostatectomy, in concurrence with our institutional experience, has shown an overall lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and decreased indwelling catheter time, with equivalent functional outcomes compared to open simple prostatectomy. Similar operative times and hospital stays were found compared to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, although a steep learning curve and cost of new equipment hinder the wide spread use of this transurethral approach.
Summary
On review of current literature in addition to our institutional experience, we favor robot-assisted simple prostatectomy over open simple, based on associated increased morbidity/catheter time/hospital stay, and holium laser enucleation of the prostate, based on steep learning curve and cost of new equipment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LUTS:
-
Lower urinary tract symptoms
- BPO:
-
Benign prostatic obstruction
- BPH:
-
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
- OSP:
-
Open simple prostatectomy
- RASP:
-
Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy
- HoLEP:
-
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
- MISP:
-
Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy
- DVC:
-
Dorsal venous complex
- LOS:
-
Length of stay
References
Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1132–8.
Han M and Partin AW. Simple prostatectomy: open and robot-assisted laparoscopic approaches. Campbell-Walsh Urology, 106, 2535–2542. e1
Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, et al. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol. 2004;46:547–54.
McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, et al. Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2011;185:1793–803.
Freyer PJ. A new method of performing prostatectomy. Lancet. 1900;1:774.
Freyer PJ. One thousand cases of total enucleation of the prostate for radical cure of enlargement of that organ. Br Med J. 1912;2:868.
Meier DE, Tarpley JL, et al. The outcome of suprapubic prostatectomy: a contemporary series in the developing world. Urology. 1995;46(1):40–4.
Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50:854.
Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002;43(2):123–33.
Mariano MD, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV. Laparoscopic prostatectomy for vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2002;167(6):2528–9.
Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:513–5.
Gilling PJ, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser prostatectomy: a technique in evolution. Curr Opin Urol. 1998;8:11.
Tooher R, Sutherland P, Costello A, Gilling P, et al. A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2004;171(Issue 5):1773–81.
Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, et al. Holumium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70g; 24m follow up. Eur Urol 2006; 563–8
Salonia A, Suradi N, Naspro R, et al. Holumium laser enucleation versus open prostectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an inpatient cost analysis. Urology. 2006;68:302–6.
Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai S. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100grams: 5 year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008;53:160–6.
Kaplan SA. Update on the American Urological Association Guidelines for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2006;8(Suppl 4):S10–7.
Yezdani M, Katz B, Yu S, Lee A, Lee DI. A novel transversus abdominal plane block during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Philadelphia: AUA Annual Meeting Moderated Poster Presentation; 2015.
Sutherland DE, Perez DS, Weeks DC. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. 2011;25:641–4.
Banapour P, Patel N, Kane CJ, Cohen SA, Parsons JK. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and report of a single institution case series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014;17:1–5.
Leslie S, de Castro Abreu AL, Chopra S, et al. Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Urol. 2014;66:321–9.
Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, et al. Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int. 2012;109:426–33.
Umari P, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, et al. Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large volume prostates (>100ml): a comparative analysis from a high volume center. J Urol. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.114.
Matei DV, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int. 2012;110(11 Pt C):E972–9.
Vora A, Mittal S, Hwang J, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: multi-institutional outcomes for glands larger than 100grams. J Endourol. 2012;26:499–502.
Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: novel technique. J Endourol. 2013;27(3):328–32.
Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, et al. Robotic extraperiotenal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol. 2006;175(3):945–51.
Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, Hegde S, Mohile PD, Bansal MB. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol. 2007;177:1468–74.
Matei DV, Spinelli MG, Nordio A, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl. 2008;9:337.
Placer J, Gelabert-Mas A, Vallmanya F, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate: outcome and complications of self-taught learning curve. Urology. 2009;73:1042–8.
Robert G, Cornu JN, Fourmarier M, et al. Multicenter prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU. 2016;117:495–9.
Pokorny M, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre. Euro Urol. 2015;68(3):451–7.
Uffort EE, Jensen JC. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: an alternative minimal invasive approach for prostate adenoma. J Robotic Surg. 2010;4:7–10.
Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, Protogerou V, Deliveliotis C. Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients. Urology. 2004;64:306.
Adam C, Hofstetter A, Deubner J, Zaak D, Weitkunat R, Seitz M, et al. Retropubic transvesical prostatectomy for significant prostatic enlargement must remain a standard part of urology training. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38:472.
Tubaro A, Carter S, Hind A, Vicentini C, Miano L. A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2001;166:172.
Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European- American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68:86–94.
Humphreys MR, Miller NL, Handa SE, Terry C. Holium laser enucleation of the prostate—outcomes independent of prostate size? J Urol. 2008;180(6):2431–5.
El Tayeb MM, Jacob JM, Bhojani N, Bammerlin E, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients requiring anticoagulation. J Endourol. 2016;30(7):805–9.
Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2015;33:563–70.
Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M et al. Complications and early postoperative outcomes after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: Results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2007: 1419–1422
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Ross Cockrell and David I. Lee declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Endourology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cockrell, R., Lee, D.I. Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Expanding on an Established Operative Approach. Curr Urol Rep 18, 37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0681-z
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0681-z